SPY vs TYL Stock Comparison
Compare SPY and TYL across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between SPY and TYL?
SPY leads the current stock comparison as State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF vs Tyler Technologies, Inc.
SPY leads
SPY leads by 13 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality.
Competitive: 3 of 4 evidence groups support SPY, and its current signal state is conflicted.
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SPY over TYL, 60 versus 47 as of Sep 11, 2026. SPY's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while TYL holds the stronger value profile. SPY also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SPY today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. SPY lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 13 points over 30 sessions.
Compare State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF and Tyler Technologies, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare SPY and TYL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience89 vs 50SPY +39
- Quality84 vs 53SPY +31
- Value39 vs 49TYL +10
- Momentum39 vs 36Even
3 of 4 evidence groups favor SPY. SPY’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; TYL keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -13
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -9
No new signals fired.
SPY's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SPY and TYL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
TYL (Tyler Technologies, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation — but at materially higher volatility, 41.9% against 8.5%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SPYSPY on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
TYLTYL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
SPYSPY on Risk Resilience, by 39 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SPY | TYL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | +21.6% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +28.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | — | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | — | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SPY. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SPY | 60 vs 47 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | TYL | Value 39 vs 49 |
| Technicals | SPY | Price vs 50-day 0.8% vs 2.6%; vs 200-day 6.2% vs -5.7% |
| Risk Resilience | SPY | Risk Resilience 89 vs 50 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SPY and TYL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 13 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SPY.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SPY lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 13 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SPY +13
- 60 vs 47
- 7 sessions ago
- SPY +3
- 64 vs 61
- 30 sessions ago
- SPY +11
- 69 vs 58
- 90 sessions ago
- TYL +3
- 59 vs 62
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Sep 1 when TYL moved ahead of SPY.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (6.24%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (2.5%)
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (8.37%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.19%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
SPY leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 3 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.85%, AIQ -3 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.35%, AIQ -2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TYL closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 39 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPY's edge.
- 2TYL's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SPY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | SPY | TYL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | 5.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | — | 18.4% |
| Gross margin | — | 46.6% |
| Operating margin | — | 15.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | — | 9.3% |
| Debt to equity | — | 0.48 |
Performance
SPY leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | SPY | TYL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1% | -10.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.9% | 5.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 4.5% | 10.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 12.1% | -3.7% |
| Year to date | 11.1% | -26.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 16.8% | -40.7% |
Technicals
SPY has the stronger structure| Metric | SPY | TYL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 45.1 | 43.7 |
| ADX (14) | 12.3 | 28.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.8% | 2.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | 6.2% | -5.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 8.5% | 41.9% |
Risk
SPY is the more resilient| Metric | SPY | TYL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1 | 0.09 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.95 | -1.13 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.38 | -1.46 |
| Max drawdown | -9.1% | -50.7% |
| Current drawdown | -2.6% | -39.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 12.9% | 41.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.4% | -4.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SPY or TYL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SPY is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 60 against TYL's 47. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. TYL is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SPY or TYL the better buy right now?
SPY carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SPY over TYL?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SPY leads Risk Resilience by 39 points; SPY leads Quality by 31 points; TYL leads Value by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SPY or TYL?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for SPY and +21.6% for TYL. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SPY or TYL?
TYL is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TYL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SPY or TYL?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SPY or TYL?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SPY or TYL?
SPY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SPY on Risk Resilience, by 39 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SPY more profitable than TYL?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is SPY's lead over TYL getting stronger or weaker?
SPY lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 13 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-01, when TYL moved ahead of SPY.
What would change the SPY vs TYL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TYL closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 39 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPY's edge; TYL's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SPY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about SPY and TYL?
SPY: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. TYL: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SPY is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TYL it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.