SPY vs WSM Stock Comparison
WSM currently leads SPY in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 59 vs 58. The clearest difference is momentum, while SPY has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between SPY and WSM?
WSM leads the current stock comparison as Williams-Sonoma, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF vs Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
WSM leads
WSM leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from SPY.
Fragile: 1 of 4 evidence groups support WSM, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors WSM over SPY, 59 versus 58 as of Oct 31, 2026. WSM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum, while SPY holds the stronger risk resilience profile. WSM also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 1 of 4 covered evidence groups favor WSM today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. WSM lead: Reversed — SPY led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; WSM now leads by 1.
Compare State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SPY and WSM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum32 vs 72WSM +40
- Risk Resilience85 vs 53SPY +32
- Value41 vs 30SPY +11
- Quality83 vs 81Even
1 of 4 evidence groups favor WSM. WSM’s edge is concentrated in momentum; SPY keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-30, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-29.
Largest factor move: Momentum -27
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience -2
New signals
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
The lead changed hands: WSM moved ahead of SPY in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SPY and WSM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum.
SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF): the counter-case, on risk resilience, value, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
WSMWSM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
SPYSPY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 11 points.
Momentum
WSMWSM on the Momentum factor, by 40 points.
Lower downside
SPYSPY on Risk Resilience, by 32 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SPY | WSM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | -5.7% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +42.4% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | — | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | — | 13 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 4 covered evidence groups favor WSM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 58 vs 59 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | SPY | Value 41 vs 30 |
| Technicals | WSM | Price vs 50-day -1.5% vs 6.9%; vs 200-day 4.3% vs 17.9% |
| Risk Resilience | SPY | Risk Resilience 85 vs 53 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SPY and WSM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on WSM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jul 1 – Oct 30WSM lead: Reversed — SPY led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; WSM now leads by 1.
- Today
- WSM +1
- 58 vs 59
- 7 sessions ago
- WSM +2
- 59 vs 61
- 30 sessions ago
- SPY +6
- 68 vs 62
- 90 sessions ago
- SPY +14
- 64 vs 50
The lead changed hands 8 times in this window, most recently on Oct 30 when WSM moved ahead of SPY.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only SPY
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (1.02%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
5 bullish / 0 bearish
Only WSM
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, 52-Week High Proximity.
SPY is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.77%, AIQ -7 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -2.75%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SPY closes the Momentum gap — currently 40 points behind, the largest single contributor to WSM's edge.
- 2SPY generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover or EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish.
- 3WSM's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | SPY | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | 8.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | — | 47.2% |
| Gross margin | — | 47.2% |
| Operating margin | — | 19.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | — | 57.8% |
| Debt to equity | — | 0.71 |
Performance
WSM leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | SPY | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.6% | 0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.8% | 8.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -0.3% | 5.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 4.9% | 38.4% |
| Year to date | 10.8% | 41.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 11.1% | 29.3% |
Technicals
WSM has the stronger structure| Metric | SPY | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 34.3 | 62.1 |
| ADX (14) | 15.3 | 21.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.5% | 6.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 4.3% | 17.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 11.6% | 31.2% |
Risk
SPY is the more resilient| Metric | SPY | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1 | 1.14 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.59 | 0.78 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.89 | 1.51 |
| Max drawdown | -9.1% | -23.6% |
| Current drawdown | -3% | -3.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 12.8% | 33.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.4% | -2.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SPY or WSM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, WSM is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 59 against SPY's 58. The edge comes from momentum. SPY is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SPY or WSM the better buy right now?
WSM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor WSM over SPY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. WSM leads Momentum by 40 points; SPY leads Risk Resilience by 32 points; SPY leads Value by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SPY or WSM?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for SPY and -5.7% for WSM. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SPY or WSM?
SPY is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SPY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 11 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SPY or WSM?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SPY or WSM?
WSM on the Momentum factor, by 40 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SPY or WSM?
SPY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SPY on Risk Resilience, by 32 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SPY more profitable than WSM?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is WSM's lead over SPY getting stronger or weaker?
WSM lead: Reversed — SPY led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; WSM now leads by 1. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-07-01 and 2026-10-30. The lead has changed hands 8 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-30, when WSM moved ahead of SPY.
What would change the SPY vs WSM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SPY closes the Momentum gap — currently 40 points behind, the largest single contributor to WSM's edge; SPY generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover or EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish; WSM's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about SPY and WSM?
SPY: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. WSM: 5 bullish / 0 bearish. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SPY is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On WSM it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.