SPYD vs JEPQ: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk

SPYD and JEPQ are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. SPYD is SPYD ETF, while JEPQ is JEPQ ETF.

Market data as of the latest close market close
SPYD
ETF
vs
JEPQ
ETF
SPYD
SPYD ETF
JEPQ
JEPQ ETF

AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison

SPYD vs JEPQ

Data as of the latest close· market close· Coverage 0/1 fields· Low confidence
AIQ VerdictCompetitive

SPYD and JEPQ are effectively level

SPYD and JEPQ are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.

AIQ Score
—/100
AIQ Edge Score
—
AIQ Score
—/100
AIQ Edge Score
—

The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate SPYD and JEPQ as of the latest close. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.

Compare SPYD and JEPQ across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.

Currently unavailable

Performance over time

Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.

SPYD
+7.0%
JEPQ
+17.3%

Price return comparison

Growth of $10,000, price only

SPYD $10,697 · JEPQ $11,733

Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.

Compare SPYD and JEPQ against another ticker

Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.

Basic: 2 symbols·Explorer: 3 symbols·Pro and Premium: 5 symbols·Your limit: 2

SPYD vs JEPQ: five-year payout growth

SPYD grew its split-adjusted payout at 3.69% a year over 2020-2025. JEPQ began paying distributions in 2022, so it has no 2020-2025 growth rate to compare.

Dividend metricSPYDJEPQ
2025 annual payout$1.957$6.123
Peer rank#23 of 33not ranked

Split-adjusted annual distributions, 2020–2025. Research as of Sep 19, 2026. Yield and expense ratio above are current values, not part of this window.

AIQ Agreement Matrix

How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.

Evidence groupFavorsReading
AIQ ScoreNot coveredNot covered
FundamentalsNot coveredNot covered
ValuationNot coveredNot covered
TechnicalsNot coveredNot covered
Risk ResilienceNot coveredNot covered
Analyst expectationsNot coveredNot covered

AIQ Decision Stability

Competitive

The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.

The full evidence

Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.

Compare SPYD and JEPQ with others

Continue your research

This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.

How this comparison is scored

The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.

The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.

How to use side-by-side comparison →

This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.