SRLN vs VCSH: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk
SRLN and VCSH are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. SRLN is State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF, while VCSH is Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF. VCSH is broader by holdings count, with 3,030 positions versus 717 for SRLN. VCSH has the lower expense ratio. Current AlgovestIQ evidence has VCSH ahead on AIQ Score, 58 versus 45.
What is the main difference between SRLN and VCSH?
VCSH holds 3,030 positions to SRLN's 717.
| Metric | SRLN | VCSH |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.7% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | 717 | 3,030 |
| Distribution yieldTrailing 12 months | 7.37% | 4.56% |
| Average volume | 1,902,232 | 5,118,374 |
| Performance | ||
| 1Y return | -2.9% | -3.3% |
| YTD return | -3.3% | -2.9% |
| 5Y annualized returnTotal return, distributions reinvested | +4.7% | +2.4% |
| Risk | ||
| Annualized volatility | 3.5% | 2.4% |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -4.7% | -4% |
| Max drawdown (5Y)Total return, distributions reinvested | -7.9% | -9% |
| Beta | 0.14 | 0.07 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.99 | -3.00 |
| Sortino ratio | -2.32 | -3.54 |
| AlgovestIQ | ||
| AIQ Score | 45/100 | 58/100 |
| AIQ Edge Score | 3/10 | 7/10 |
| Momentum | 25/100 | 48/100 |
| Risk Resilience | 64/100 | 77/100 |
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF vs Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
VCSH leads
VCSH leads by 13 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the lead has widened from 4 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 3 of 4 evidence groups support VCSH, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors VCSH over SRLN, 58 versus 45 as of Oct 21, 2026. VCSH's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience. VCSH also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor VCSH today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. VCSH lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 13 points over 30 sessions. VCSH leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.
SRLN vs VCSH: which fits what
Each row is settled by a single measure. Where the gap is too small to matter it reads Similar, and no row decides the comparison as a whole.
| If you want | SRLN | VCSH | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower costExpense ratio | 0.7% | 0.03% | VCSH |
| Broader diversificationNumber of holdings | 717 | 3,030 | VCSH |
| Higher incomeTrailing 12-month distribution yield | 7.37% | 4.56% | SRLN |
| Smaller drawdownsMax drawdown, 5 years | -7.9% | -9% | Similar |
| Lower volatilityAnnualized volatility, 1 year | 3.5% | 2.4% | VCSH |
Similar means the gap is within 0.01 percentage points of expense ratio, 25% more holdings, 3 points of top-10 weight, 0.2 points of yield, 2 points of drawdown or 1 point of volatility. Past drawdowns and volatility describe the funds’ history, not their future.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes for both ETFs.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SRLN and VCSH against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum25 vs 48VCSH +23
- Risk Resilience64 vs 77VCSH +13
- Quality60 vs 70VCSH +10
- Value36 vs 45VCSH +9
3 of 4 evidence groups favor VCSH. VCSH’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
No factor moved materially.
New signals
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.00%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
VCSH's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SRLN and VCSH both carry a full feed there.
Fund facts, side by side
Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.
| Measure | SRLN | VCSH | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.7% | 0.03% | Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold. |
| Holdings | 717 | 3,030 | More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns. |
| Average volume | 1,902,232 | 5,118,374 | Liquidity — matters most if you trade size. |
| Annualized volatility | 3.5% | 2.4% | Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure. |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -4.7% | -4% | The worst peak-to-trough loss over the past year. |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.99 | -3.00 | Return per unit of risk. Higher is better. |
| Beta | 0.14 | 0.07 | Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio. |
Where the exposure actually sits
Sector exposure for each fund, ordered by the size of the difference.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor VCSH. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | VCSH | 45 vs 58 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | VCSH | Value 36 vs 45 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -1.3% vs -0.6%; vs 200-day -1.4% vs -1.9% |
| Risk Resilience | VCSH | Risk Resilience 64 vs 77 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SRLN and VCSH and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 13 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on VCSH.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20VCSH lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 13 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- VCSH +13
- 45 vs 58
- 7 sessions ago
- VCSH +12
- 45 vs 57
- 30 sessions ago
- VCSH +4
- 48 vs 52
- 90 sessions ago
- VCSH +1
- 55 vs 56
The lead changed hands 8 times in this window, most recently on Sep 24 when VCSH moved ahead of SRLN.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only SRLN
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only VCSH
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, ATR Contraction - Coiling, 52-Week Low Proximity, Downtrend Structure Active.
VCSH leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.05%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.01%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SRLN closes the Momentum gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to VCSH's edge.
- 2SRLN's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3VCSH's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | SRLN | VCSH |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.6% | 0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -2% | -0.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -1.1% | -1.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -1.4% | -2.5% |
| Year to date | -3.3% | -2.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -2.9% | -3.3% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | SRLN | VCSH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 25 | 57.3 |
| ADX (14) | 48.5 | 26.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.3% | -0.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -1.4% | -1.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 2.8% | 2.6% |
Risk
VCSH is the more resilient| Metric | SRLN | VCSH |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.14 | 0.07 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.99 | -3 |
| Sortino ratio | -2.32 | -3.54 |
| Max drawdown | -4.7% | -4% |
| Current drawdown | -3.9% | -3.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 3.5% | 2.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -0.4% | -0.3% |
Straight answers
Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.
What is the difference between SRLN and VCSH?
VCSH holds 3,030 positions to SRLN's 717.
Which ETF is more diversified, SRLN or VCSH?
VCSH holds more positions: 3,030 versus 717 for SRLN.
Which has the lower expense ratio?
VCSH has the lower expense ratio, 0.03% a year against 0.7% for SRLN.
Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?
SRLN, with a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 7.37% against 4.56% for VCSH.
Which ETF has been more volatile?
SRLN has been more volatile over the past year, at 3.5% annualized against 2.4% for VCSH.
Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?
Their worst peak-to-trough falls over the past five years are similar: -7.9% for SRLN and -9% for VCSH.
Compare SRLN and VCSH with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.