SSO vs TSLL Stock Comparison
ProShares - Ultra S&P500 vs Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF
SSO leads
SSO leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 14 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 4 of 4 evidence groups support SSO, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
ProShares - Ultra S&P500
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SSO over TSLL, 51 versus 45 as of Sep 5, 2026. SSO's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and value, while TSLL holds the stronger momentum profile. SSO also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SSO today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. SSO lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 14 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare ProShares - Ultra S&P500 and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare SSO and TSLL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience15%45 vs 0SSO +45
- Value30%37 vs 25SSO +12
- Momentum25%57 vs 66TSLL +9
- Quality30%62 vs 70TSLL +8
4 of 4 evidence groups favor SSO. SSO’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and value; TSLL keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-03, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-02.
Largest factor move: Momentum +9
New signals
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (1.7%)
Largest factor move: Momentum +18
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
SSO's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SSO and TSLL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SSO (ProShares - Ultra S&P500): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and value.
TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF): the counter-case, on momentum, quality — but at materially higher volatility, 89.9% against 16.5%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SSOSSO on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
SSOSSO on the peer-relative Value factor, by 12 points.
Momentum
TSLLTSLL on the Momentum factor, by 9 points.
Lower downside
SSOSSO on Risk Resilience, by 45 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SSO. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SSO | 51 vs 45 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | SSO | Value 37 vs 25 |
| Technicals | SSO | Price vs 50-day 3% vs -8%; vs 200-day 15% vs -26.8% |
| Risk Resilience | SSO | Risk Resilience 45 vs 0 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SSO and TSLL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- 4 of 4 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SSO.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 22 – Sep 3SSO lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 14 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SSO +6
- 51 vs 45
- 7 sessions ago
- SSO +9
- 50 vs 41
- 30 sessions ago
- SSO +14
- 55 vs 41
- 90 sessions ago
- SSO +17
- 51 vs 34
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (10.74%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (42.51%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
SSO leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.8%, AIQ +2 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 5 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -11.85%, AIQ +5 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TSLL closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 45 points behind, the largest single contributor to SSO's edge.
- 2TSLL's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SSO's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate SSO's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Technicals
SSO has the stronger structure| Metric | SSO | TSLL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 45.5 | 62.2 |
| ADX (14) | 13 | 21.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 3% | -8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 15% | -26.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 16.5% | 89.9% |
Risk
SSO is the more resilient| Metric | SSO | TSLL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.99 | 4.54 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.19 | 0.26 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.7 | 0.4 |
| Max drawdown | -18.3% | -70.7% |
| Current drawdown | -1.6% | -54.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 25.6% | 94.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.8% | -9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SSO or TSLL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SSO is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 51 against TSLL's 45. The edge comes from risk resilience and value. TSLL is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SSO or TSLL the better buy right now?
SSO carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SSO over TSLL?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. SSO leads Risk Resilience by 45 points; SSO leads Value by 12 points; TSLL leads Momentum by 9 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which is better value, SSO or TSLL?
SSO is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SSO on the peer-relative Value factor, by 12 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SSO or TSLL?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SSO or TSLL?
TSLL on the Momentum factor, by 9 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SSO or TSLL?
SSO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SSO on Risk Resilience, by 45 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SSO more profitable than TSLL?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is SSO's lead over TSLL getting stronger or weaker?
SSO lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 14 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-22 and 2026-09-03. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the SSO vs TSLL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TSLL closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 45 points behind, the largest single contributor to SSO's edge; TSLL's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SSO's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate SSO's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about SSO and TSLL?
SSO: 4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. TSLL: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SSO is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TSLL it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.