QCOM vs SWKS Stock Comparison
QCOM currently leads SWKS in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 71 vs 65. The clearest difference is quality, while SWKS has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between QCOM and SWKS?
QCOM leads the current stock comparison as QUALCOMM Incorporated, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
QUALCOMM Incorporated vs Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
QCOM leads
QCOM leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 9 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support QCOM, its lead is narrowing, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors QCOM over SWKS, 71 versus 65 as of Oct 31, 2026. QCOM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while SWKS holds the stronger momentum profile. QCOM also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor QCOM today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. QCOM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare QUALCOMM Incorporated and Skyworks Solutions, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare QCOM and SWKS against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality83 vs 52QCOM +31
- Momentum70 vs 78SWKS +8
- Risk Resilience51 vs 58SWKS +7
- Value69 vs 72Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor QCOM. QCOM’s edge is concentrated in quality; SWKS keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
No factor moved materially.
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Compression — neutral, trend, medium horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +11
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
QCOM's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — QCOM and SWKS both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
QCOM (QUALCOMM Incorporated): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
SWKS (Skyworks Solutions, Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, risk resilience, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
QCOMQCOM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SWKSSWKS on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
SWKSSWKS on the Momentum factor, by 8 points.
Lower downside
SWKSSWKS on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
QCOMQCOM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | QCOM | SWKS | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +30.7% | -13.6% | QCOM has more room |
| Target dispersion | +111.9% | +72.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 18 | 11 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | QCOM | SWKS |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 6.49% | 8.45% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $2.570 | $1.880 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $3.520 | $2.820 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #203 | #133 |
SWKS grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 8.45% a year against QCOM's 6.49%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor QCOM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | QCOM | 71 vs 65 |
| Fundamentals | QCOMon balance | EPS growth -72.7% vs -8.3%; TTM ROE 37.3% vs 5%; gross margin 54.2% vs 40.7%; operating margin 23.2% vs 7.9% — QCOM takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 69 vs 72 |
| Technicals | SWKS | Price vs 50-day -7% vs 9.9%; vs 200-day 8% vs 29.5% |
| Risk Resilience | SWKS | Risk Resilience 51 vs 58 |
| Analyst expectations | QCOM | Target upside 30.7% vs -13.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of QCOM and SWKS and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on QCOM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28QCOM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- QCOM +6
- 71 vs 65
- 7 sessions ago
- QCOM +2
- 63 vs 61
- 30 sessions ago
- QCOM +9
- 64 vs 55
- 90 sessions ago
- QCOM +5
- 65 vs 60
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Aug 17 when QCOM moved ahead of SWKS.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only QCOM
- EMA Ribbon Compression — neutral, trend, medium horizon
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only SWKS
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.95%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, Uptrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -11.12%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 3 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.07%, AIQ +3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SWKS closes the Quality gap — currently 31 points behind, the largest single contributor to QCOM's edge.
- 2SWKS's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3QCOM's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate QCOM's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
QCOM leads on balance| Metric | QCOM | SWKS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -6.2% | -0.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -72.7% | -8.3% |
| Gross margin | 54.2% | 40.7% |
| Operating margin | 23.2% | 7.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 37.3% | 5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.55 | 0.12 |
Performance
SWKS leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | QCOM | SWKS |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.8% | 6.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.6% | 2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 20.7% | 39.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 17.3% | 39.2% |
| Year to date | 7% | 37.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 8.3% | 17.8% |
Technicals
SWKS has the stronger structure| Metric | QCOM | SWKS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 57.9 | 67.3 |
| ADX (14) | 10.4 | 16.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | -7% | 9.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 8% | 29.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 30.9% | 34.9% |
Risk
SWKS is the more resilient| Metric | QCOM | SWKS |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.06 | 1.32 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.21 | 0.34 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.31 | 0.5 |
| Max drawdown | -41.2% | -34.6% |
| Current drawdown | -27.1% | -4.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 53% | 50.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.8% | -5.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, QCOM or SWKS?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, QCOM is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 71 against SWKS's 65. The edge comes from quality. SWKS is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is QCOM or SWKS the better buy right now?
QCOM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor QCOM over SWKS?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. QCOM leads Quality by 31 points; SWKS leads Momentum by 8 points; SWKS leads Risk Resilience by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, QCOM or SWKS?
Analyst price targets imply +30.7% upside for QCOM and -13.6% for SWKS, so the Street currently favors QCOM. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, QCOM or SWKS?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, QCOM or SWKS?
SWKS on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, QCOM or SWKS?
SWKS on the Momentum factor, by 8 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, QCOM or SWKS?
SWKS is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SWKS on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is QCOM more profitable than SWKS?
QCOM leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 54.2% vs 40.7%; operating margin 23.2% vs 7.9%; ttm roe 37.3% vs 5%.
Is QCOM's lead over SWKS getting stronger or weaker?
QCOM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-17, when QCOM moved ahead of SWKS.
What would change the QCOM vs SWKS verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SWKS closes the Quality gap — currently 31 points behind, the largest single contributor to QCOM's edge; SWKS's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; QCOM's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate QCOM's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about QCOM and SWKS?
QCOM: 3 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. SWKS: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on QCOM is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SWKS it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare QCOM and SWKS with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.