QQQ vs SWX Stock Comparison
SWX currently leads QQQ in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 58 vs 57. The clearest difference is momentum, while QQQ has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between QQQ and SWX?
SWX leads the current stock comparison as Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
SWX leads
SWX leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value.
Fragile: 2 of 4 evidence groups support SWX.
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SWX over QQQ, 58 versus 57 as of Oct 31, 2026. SWX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value, while QQQ holds the stronger quality profile. SWX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SWX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points.
Compare Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 and Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare QQQ and SWX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum46 vs 80SWX +34
- Quality81 vs 56QQQ +25
- Risk Resilience69 vs 59QQQ +10
- Value35 vs 42SWX +7
2 of 4 evidence groups favor SWX. SWX’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value; QQQ keeps a meaningful quality edge.
The central trade-off
SWX (Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1): the counter-case, on quality, risk resilience.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SWXSWX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
SWXSWX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 7 points.
Momentum
SWXSWX on the Momentum factor, by 34 points.
Lower downside
QQQQQQ on Risk Resilience, by 10 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | QQQ | SWX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | +8.7% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +10.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | — | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | — | 5 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SWX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 57 vs 58 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | SWX | Value 35 vs 42 |
| Technicals | SWX | Price vs 50-day -4.8% vs 7.2%; vs 200-day 6.9% vs 4.9% |
| Risk Resilience | QQQ | Risk Resilience 69 vs 59 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of QQQ and SWX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SWX.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1QQQ closes the Momentum gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to SWX's edge.
- 2QQQ generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3SWX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | QQQ | SWX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | -38.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | — | -69.6% |
| Gross margin | — | 56.6% |
| Operating margin | — | 28.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | — | 12.9% |
| Debt to equity | — | 0.85 |
Performance
QQQ leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | QQQ | SWX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.1% | 4.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.9% | 12% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 6.2% | 2.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 9.7% | 0.6% |
| Year to date | 18.1% | 15.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 17.6% | 12.8% |
Technicals
SWX has the stronger structure| Metric | QQQ | SWX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 39.4 | 80 |
| ADX (14) | 25.5 | 34 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.8% | 7.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 6.9% | 4.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 19.5% | 18.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, QQQ or SWX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SWX is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 58 against QQQ's 57. The edge comes from momentum and value. QQQ is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is QQQ or SWX the better buy right now?
SWX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SWX over QQQ?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SWX leads Momentum by 34 points; QQQ leads Quality by 25 points; QQQ leads Risk Resilience by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, QQQ or SWX?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for QQQ and +8.7% for SWX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, QQQ or SWX?
SWX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SWX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 7 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, QQQ or SWX?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, QQQ or SWX?
SWX on the Momentum factor, by 34 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SWX?
QQQ is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. QQQ on Risk Resilience, by 10 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is QQQ more profitable than SWX?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
What would change the QQQ vs SWX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: QQQ closes the Momentum gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to SWX's edge; QQQ generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; SWX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.