TSM vs TSM Stock Comparison
Compare TSM vs TSM on performance, valuation, growth, fundamentals, momentum and risk; the current AIQ evidence does not show a clear headline leader.
What is the main difference between TSM and TSM?
TSM and TSM are close on the current AIQ evidence, so the better fit depends more on objective, risk tolerance and valuation preference than on a single headline score.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
TSM and TSM are effectively level
TSM and TSM are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate TSM and TSM as of Oct 31, 2026. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Compare Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare TSM and TSM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality98 vs 98Even
- Value45 vs 45Even
- Momentum52 vs 52Even
- Risk Resilience65 vs 65Even
Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
EvenNeither separates on the overall score.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
EvenDownside measures are level or not covered.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | TSM | TSM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +45% | +45% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +34% | +34% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | TSM | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 15.29% | 15.29% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $1.360 | $1.360 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.769 | $2.769 |
| Years increased | 4 | 4 |
| No cut in window | No (1) | No (1) |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | not ranked |
TSM and TSM grew their split-adjusted regular dividends at the same rate over 2020–2025, 15.29% a year.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 66 vs 66 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 17.6% vs 17.6%; EPS growth 8% vs 8%; TTM ROE 41.2% vs 41.2%; gross margin 65.8% vs 65.8%; operating margin 57.9% vs 57.9% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 45 vs 45 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -6.6% vs -6.6%; vs 200-day 10.1% vs 10.1% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 65 vs 65 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 45% vs 45% |
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 0 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 0 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | TSM | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 17.6% | 17.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 8% | 8% |
| Gross margin | 65.8% | 65.8% |
| Operating margin | 57.9% | 57.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 41.2% | 41.2% |
| Debt to equity | 0.14 | 0.14 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | TSM | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.7% | -3.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 9% | 9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 11.6% | 11.6% |
| Year to date | 44.6% | 44.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 49% | 49% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | TSM | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41.8 | 41.8 |
| ADX (14) | 19.9 | 19.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6.6% | -6.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | 10.1% | 10.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 35.7% | 35.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which has more analyst upside, TSM or TSM?
Analyst price targets imply +45% upside for TSM and +45% for TSM. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, TSM or TSM?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, TSM or TSM?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, TSM or TSM?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, TSM or TSM?
The two are close on downside measures. Downside measures are level or not covered. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is TSM more profitable than TSM?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Compare TSM and TSM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.