VIG vs JEPI: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk
VIG and JEPI are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. VIG is Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF, while JEPI is JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF. VIG is broader by holdings count, with 336 positions versus 136 for JEPI. VIG is more concentrated at the top, based on top-10 holdings weight. Current AlgovestIQ evidence has JEPI ahead on AIQ Score, 67 versus 64.
What is the main difference between VIG and JEPI?
VIG and JEPI have little in common: 29% of their weight is in the same securities.
| Metric | VIG | JEPI |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.35% |
| Holdings | 336 | 136 |
| Top-10 concentration | 33.5% | 18.1% |
| Distribution yieldTrailing 12 months | 1.5% | 7.96% |
| Average volume | 1,070,068 | 4,434,583 |
| Performance | ||
| 1Y return | +13% | +1.5% |
| YTD return | +10.6% | +0.2% |
| 5Y annualized returnTotal return, distributions reinvested | +10.2% | +7.3% |
| Risk | ||
| Annualized volatility | 10% | 8.4% |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -8.3% | -7.7% |
| Max drawdown (5Y)Total return, distributions reinvested | -20.4% | -13.7% |
| Beta | 0.64 | 0.42 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.85 | -0.32 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.39 | -0.47 |
| AlgovestIQ | ||
| AIQ Score | 64/100 | 67/100 |
| AIQ Edge Score | 9/10 | 10/10 |
| Momentum | 81/100 | 79/100 |
| Risk Resilience | 83/100 | 74/100 |
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF vs JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
JEPI leads
JEPI leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Value.
Fragile: 1 of 4 evidence groups support JEPI, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors JEPI over VIG, 67 versus 64 as of Oct 21, 2026. JEPI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while VIG holds the stronger risk resilience profile. JEPI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 1 of 4 covered evidence groups favor JEPI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. JEPI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.
VIG vs JEPI: which fits what
Each row is settled by a single measure. Where the gap is too small to matter it reads Similar, and no row decides the comparison as a whole.
| If you want | VIG | JEPI | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower costExpense ratio | 0.04% | 0.35% | VIG |
| Broader diversificationNumber of holdings | 336 | 136 | VIG |
| Lower concentrationWeight of the 10 largest holdings | 33.5% | 18.1% | JEPI |
| Higher incomeTrailing 12-month distribution yield | 1.5% | 7.96% | JEPI |
| Smaller drawdownsMax drawdown, 5 years | -20.4% | -13.7% | JEPI |
| Lower volatilityAnnualized volatility, 1 year | 10% | 8.4% | JEPI |
Similar means the gap is within 0.01 percentage points of expense ratio, 25% more holdings, 3 points of top-10 weight, 0.2 points of yield, 2 points of drawdown or 1 point of volatility. Past drawdowns and volatility describe the funds’ history, not their future.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes for both ETFs.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare VIG and JEPI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value41 vs 51JEPI +10
- Risk Resilience83 vs 74VIG +9
- Quality65 vs 68Even
- Momentum81 vs 79Even
1 of 4 evidence groups favor JEPI. JEPI’s edge is concentrated in value; VIG keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Value +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +13
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
The lead changed hands: JEPI moved ahead of VIG in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — VIG and JEPI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
JEPI (JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF): the counter-case, on risk resilience, technicals.
Fund facts, side by side
Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.
| Measure | VIG | JEPI | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.35% | Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold. |
| Holdings | 336 | 136 | More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns. |
| Average volume | 1,070,068 | 4,434,583 | Liquidity — matters most if you trade size. |
| Annualized volatility | 10% | 8.4% | Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure. |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -8.3% | -7.7% | The worst peak-to-trough loss over the past year. |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.85 | -0.32 | Return per unit of risk. Higher is better. |
| Beta | 0.64 | 0.42 | Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio. |
Where the exposure actually sits
Sector exposure for each fund, ordered by the size of the difference.
How much of the same holdings they own
VIG and JEPI share 29.3% of their weighted exposure across 45 common holdings.
288 holdings are unique to VIG, and 85 holdings are unique to JEPI. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
VIG is the more concentrated of the two: its ten largest positions are 33.45% of the fund, against 18.06% for JEPI (336 holdings vs 136). Concentration cuts both ways — it is what drives outperformance when the top names work, and what makes the drawdown deeper when they do not.
Largest shared positions
| Holding | VIG | JEPI | Shared |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.34% | 1.94% | 1.94% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 4.46% | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2% | 1.78% | 1.78% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 2.67% | 1.78% | 1.78% |
| ABBVAbbVie Inc | 1.92% | 1.65% | 1.65% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.63% | 1.63% | 1.63% |
| VVisa Inc | 2.45% | 1.49% | 1.49% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.58% | 1.45% | 1.45% |
Shared weight is the lower of the two positions — the portion of capital both funds genuinely have in the same security.
What VIG adds that JEPI doesn’t
| Holding | VIG | JEPI |
|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.63% | 1.63% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 4.46% | 1.9% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.34% | 1.94% |
| JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co | 4.08% | Not held |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 3.93% | 0.94% |
| XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corp | 2.79% | 0.33% |
What JEPI adds that VIG doesn’t
| Holding | JEPI | VIG |
|---|---|---|
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC COMMON | 1.89% | Not held |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 1.86% | Not held |
| NVDANVIDIA CORP COMMON STOCK | 1.83% | Not held |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC-CL A - | 1.71% | Not held |
| NEENEXTERA ENERGY INC | 1.69% | 0.78% |
| TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC | 1.69% | Not held |
Each list is a fund’s largest positions by weight that the other fund does not hold, or holds at less than half the weight.
VIG vs JEPI: five-year payout growth
VIG grew its split-adjusted payout faster over 2020-2025 — 9.15% a year against JEPI's 7.88%. VIG never reduced its annual distribution in the window; JEPI did in 2 years. JEPI: The payout jumped 52.9% in 2022, a single step rather than steady compounding - often an index or mandate change.
| Dividend metric | VIG | JEPI |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y payout CAGR | 9.15% | 7.88% |
| 2020 annual payout | $2.297 | $3.230 |
| 2025 annual payout | $3.558 | $4.720 |
| Calendar-year declines | 0 | 2 |
| Peer rank | #7 of 33 | #1 of 3 |
Split-adjusted annual distributions, 2020–2025. Research as of Sep 19, 2026. Yield and expense ratio above are current values, not part of this window.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 4 covered evidence groups favor JEPI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 64 vs 67 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | JEPI | Value 41 vs 51 |
| Technicals | VIG | Price vs 50-day 1.4% vs 0.6%; vs 200-day 4.9% vs 0.3% |
| Risk Resilience | VIG | Risk Resilience 83 vs 74 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of VIG and JEPI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on JEPI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20JEPI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- JEPI +3
- 64 vs 67
- 7 sessions ago
- VIG +3
- 64 vs 61
- 30 sessions ago
- JEPI +2
- 54 vs 56
- 90 sessions ago
- VIG +2
- 61 vs 59
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Oct 20 when JEPI moved ahead of VIG.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
6 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only VIG
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.68%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (1.5%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only JEPI
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.29%)
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: ATR Contraction - Coiling, Keltner Channel Breakout, RSI Overbought, MACD Bullish Crossover.
JEPI leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.24%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.02%, AIQ +4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1VIG closes the Value gap — currently 10 points behind, the largest single contributor to JEPI's edge.
- 2VIG's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3JEPI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Performance
VIG leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | VIG | JEPI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.4% | 0.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.1% | 1.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 2.4% | 1.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 7.5% | -0.2% |
| Year to date | 10.6% | 0.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 13% | 1.5% |
Technicals
VIG has the stronger structure| Metric | VIG | JEPI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 84.8 | 74.6 |
| ADX (14) | 23.8 | 20.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | 1.4% | 0.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | 4.9% | 0.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 8.5% | 5.4% |
Risk
VIG is the more resilient| Metric | VIG | JEPI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.64 | 0.42 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.85 | -0.32 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.39 | -0.47 |
| Max drawdown | -8.3% | -7.7% |
| Current drawdown | -1.4% | -4.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 10% | 8.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -0.9% | -0.9% |
Straight answers
Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.
What is the difference between VIG and JEPI?
VIG and JEPI have little in common: 29% of their weight is in the same securities.
How much do VIG and JEPI overlap?
VIG and JEPI share 29.3% of their weighted exposure across 45 common holdings. 288 holdings are unique to VIG, and 85 holdings are unique to JEPI. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
Which ETF is more diversified, VIG or JEPI?
VIG holds more positions: 336 versus 136 for JEPI.
Which has the lower expense ratio?
VIG has the lower expense ratio, 0.04% a year against 0.35% for JEPI.
Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?
JEPI, with a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 7.96% against 1.5% for VIG.
Which ETF has been more volatile?
VIG has been more volatile over the past year, at 10% annualized against 8.4% for JEPI.
Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?
JEPI fell less from peak to trough over the past five years: -13.7% against -20.4% for VIG.
Compare VIG and JEPI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.