VOO vs TSM Stock Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
VOO and TSM are effectively level
VOO and TSM are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate VOO and TSM as of Sep 5, 2026. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Compare Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare VOO and TSM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience15%89 vs 69VOO +20
- Quality30%78 vs 96TSM +18
- Momentum25%57 vs 42VOO +15
- Value30%37 vs 42TSM +5
Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-03, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-02.
Largest factor move: Momentum +12
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No new signals fired.
TSM's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — VOO and TSM both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
EvenNeither separates on the overall score.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
TSMTSM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points.
Momentum
VOOVOO on the Momentum factor, by 15 points.
Lower downside
VOOVOO on Risk Resilience, by 20 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | VOO | TSM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | +35.1% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +38% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | — | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | — | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 62 vs 62 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | TSM | Value 37 vs 42 |
| Technicals | TSM | Price vs 50-day 1.9% vs 2%; vs 200-day 8.6% vs 12.1% |
| Risk Resilience | VOO | Risk Resilience 89 vs 69 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 0 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 22 – Sep 3- Today
- Level
- 62 vs 62
- 7 sessions ago
- TSM +1
- 61 vs 62
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 68 vs 68
- 90 sessions ago
- TSM +6
- 62 vs 68
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Aug 21 when TSM moved ahead of VOO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (6.22%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.7%)
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (13.02%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 3 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.38%, AIQ +3 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.85%, AIQ +1 points).
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | VOO | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | 12% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | — | 22.1% |
| Gross margin | — | 64.2% |
| Operating margin | — | 56% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | — | 39.3% |
| Debt to equity | — | 0.15 |
Technicals
TSM has the stronger structure| Metric | VOO | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 46.9 | 43.6 |
| ADX (14) | 13.4 | 7.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | 1.9% | 2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 8.6% | 12.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 8.2% | 24.3% |
Risk
VOO is the more resilient| Metric | VOO | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1 | 2.18 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.19 | 1.57 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.69 | 2.52 |
| Max drawdown | -9.2% | -21.6% |
| Current drawdown | -0.6% | -12.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 12.8% | 40.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.4% | -4.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which has more analyst upside, VOO or TSM?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for VOO and +35.1% for TSM. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, VOO or TSM?
TSM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TSM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, VOO or TSM?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, VOO or TSM?
VOO on the Momentum factor, by 15 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, VOO or TSM?
VOO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. VOO on Risk Resilience, by 20 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is VOO more profitable than TSM?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
What do the current signals say about VOO and TSM?
VOO: 4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. TSM: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on VOO is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TSM it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.