TSM vs WBS Stock Comparison

Compare TSM vs WBS on performance, valuation, growth, fundamentals, momentum and risk; the current AIQ evidence does not show a clear headline leader.

Market data as of Oct 21, 2026 market close· AIQ score gap 0 points
TSM
Technology
vs
WBS
Financial Services
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
Price
$432
Day move
+1.6%
AIQ Score
58/100
Best edge
Quality
Sector
Technology
WBS
Webster Financial Corporation
Price
$77.57
Day move
-
AIQ Score
58/100
Best edge
Value
Sector
Financial Services

What is the main difference between TSM and WBS?

TSM and WBS are close on the current AIQ evidence, so the better fit depends more on objective, risk tolerance and valuation preference than on a single headline score.

AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited vs Webster Financial Corporation

Data as of Oct 21, 2026· market close· Cross-sector · Technology vs Financial Services· Coverage 64/66 fields· High confidence
AIQ VerdictFragileAIQ Comparison Conviction 1/10

TSM and WBS are effectively level

TSM and WBS are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.

Evidence agreement: 0 of 6Comparison trend: Weakening
TSM

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited

AIQ Score
58/100
AIQ Edge Score
7/10
WBS

Webster Financial Corporation

AIQ Score
58/100
AIQ Edge Score
7/10

The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate TSM and WBS as of Oct 21, 2026. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.

Compare Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited and Webster Financial Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.

Currently unavailable

Performance over time

Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.

TSM
+299.3%
WBS
+56.2%

Total return comparison

Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested

TSM $39,934 · WBS $15,618

Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.

Compare TSM and WBS against another ticker

Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.

Basic: 2 symbols·Explorer: 3 symbols·Pro and Premium: 5 symbols·Your limit: 2

AIQ Factor Divergence

Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.

TSM advantage
0
WBS advantage
  • Quality98 vs 62
    TSM +36
  • Value45 vs 49
    WBS +4
  • Risk Resilience67 vs 69
    Even

Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.

What changed since the last close

Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.

TSM+1 AIQ

Largest factor move: Momentum +3

No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.

WBS0 AIQ

No factor moved materially.

No signal started or stopped since the prior session.

WBS's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.

Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — TSM and WBS both carry a full feed there.

Which one fits your objective

The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.

Balanced

Even

Neither separates on the overall score.

Growth

TSM

TSM on combined revenue and EPS growth.

Value

WBS

WBS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.

Momentum

Even

The two are level on Momentum.

Lower downside

WBS

WBS carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.

Analyst upside

TSM

TSM on implied upside to the consensus price target.

AIQ vs Wall Street

Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.

MeasureTSMWBSNote
Implied upside to target+36.4%-2%TSM has more room
Target dispersion+34%0%Lower is tighter analyst agreement
ConsensusBuyHoldContext, not a primary driver
Analysts covering71Higher coverage generally improves confidence

Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.

Dividend growth

TSM vs WBS: regular dividend growth
Dividend metricTSMWBS
5Y dividend CAGR15.29%0.00%
2020 regular DPS$1.360$1.600
2025 regular DPS$2.769$1.600
Years increased40
No cut in windowNo (1)Yes
Cohort ranknot ranked#349

TSM grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 15.29% a year against WBS's 0.00%. WBS never reduced its regular dividend in the window; TSM did in 1 year.

Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.

Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.

AIQ Agreement Matrix

How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.

Evidence groupFavorsReading
AIQ ScoreEven58 vs 58
FundamentalsTSMrevenue growth 17.6% vs 12.7%; EPS growth 8% vs 4%; TTM ROE 41.2% vs 10.7%; gross margin 65.8% vs 62.5%; operating margin 57.9% vs 26.9%
ValuationWBSValue 45 vs 49
TechnicalsWBSPrice vs 50-day -0.6% vs 1.4%; vs 200-day 7.3% vs 11.4%
Risk ResilienceEvenRisk Resilience 67 vs 69
Analyst expectationsTSMTarget upside 36.4% vs -2%

AIQ Decision Stability

Fragile

The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.

  • The AIQ gap is narrow at 0 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
  • Only 0 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
  • The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
  • The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)

How the comparison changed

120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20

TSM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 0 points over 30 sessions.

Jun 21TSM leads above the line · WBS leads belowOct 20
Today
Level
58 vs 58
7 sessions ago
WBS +3
56 vs 59
30 sessions ago
TSM +13
72 vs 59
90 sessions ago
TSM +8
71 vs 63

The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Oct 14 when WBS moved ahead of TSM.

AIQ Signal Divergence

Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.

TSMConflicted

1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted

Only TSM

  • Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (9.68%)
  • MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
WBS

No active signals

No signal that the other name lacks.

Price vs model alignment

Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.

TSMConfirmed strength

Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.6%, AIQ +1 points).

The full evidence

Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.

Fundamentals

TSM leads on balance
MetricTSMWBS
Revenue growth (YoY)17.6%12.7%
EPS growth (YoY)8%4%
Gross margin65.8%62.5%
Operating margin57.9%26.9%
Return on equity (TTM)41.2%10.7%
Debt to equity0.140.46

Performance

Split across windows
MetricTSMWBS
1 week (5 sessions)-4.5%-1.9%
1 month (20 sessions)-6%1.2%
3 months (63 sessions)0.9%8.2%
6 months (126 sessions)15.5%7%
Year to date39.9%23.2%
1 year (252 sessions)41.8%34.9%

Technicals

WBS has the stronger structure
MetricTSMWBS
RSI (14)36.752.8
ADX (14)21.619.1
Price vs 50-day-0.6%1.4%
Price vs 200-day7.3%11.4%
Volatility (1M, annualized)28.8%14.3%

Risk

Split
MetricTSMWBS
Beta2.110.68
Sharpe ratio1.041.1
Sortino ratio1.661.56
Max drawdown-21.6%-13.2%
Current drawdown-12.5%-2%
Annualized volatility38.9%23.2%
Value at risk (95%)-3.8%-1.7%

Straight answers

Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.

Which has more analyst upside, TSM or WBS?

Analyst price targets imply +36.4% upside for TSM and -2% for WBS, so the Street currently favors TSM. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.

Which is better value, TSM or WBS?

WBS is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. WBS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.

Which has stronger growth, TSM or WBS?

TSM on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.

Which has stronger momentum, TSM or WBS?

The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.

Which is riskier, TSM or WBS?

WBS is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. WBS carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.

Is TSM more profitable than WBS?

TSM leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 65.8% vs 62.5%; operating margin 57.9% vs 26.9%; ttm roe 41.2% vs 10.7%.

What do the current signals say about TSM and WBS?

TSM: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. WBS: No active signals. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on TSM is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).

Compare TSM and WBS with others

Continue your research

This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.

How this comparison is scored

The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.

The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.

How to use side-by-side comparison →

This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.