YMAG vs YMAX: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk

YMAG and YMAX are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. YMAG is YMAG ETF, while YMAX is YMAX ETF.

Market data as of the latest close market close
YMAG
ETF
vs
YMAX
ETF
YMAG
YMAG ETF
YMAX
YMAX ETF

AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison

YMAG vs YMAX

Data as of the latest close· market close· Options Income / Covered Call· Coverage 0/1 fields· Low confidence
AIQ VerdictCompetitive

YMAG and YMAX are effectively level

YMAG and YMAX are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.

AIQ Score
—/100
AIQ Edge Score
—
AIQ Score
—/100
AIQ Edge Score
—

The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate YMAG and YMAX as of the latest close. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.

Compare YMAG and YMAX across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.

Currently unavailable

Performance over time

Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.

YMAG
-43.7%
YMAX
-63.8%

Price return comparison

Growth of $10,000, price only

YMAG $5,630 · YMAX $3,624

Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.

Compare YMAG and YMAX against another ticker

Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.

Basic: 2 symbols·Explorer: 3 symbols·Pro and Premium: 5 symbols·Your limit: 2

YMAG vs YMAX: five-year payout growth

YMAG began paying distributions in 2024, so it has no 2020-2025 growth rate to compare. YMAX began paying distributions in 2024, so it has no 2020-2025 growth rate to compare.

Dividend metricYMAGYMAX
2025 annual payout$7.438$7.674
Peer ranknot rankednot ranked

Split-adjusted annual distributions, 2020–2025. Research as of Sep 19, 2026. Yield and expense ratio above are current values, not part of this window.

AIQ Agreement Matrix

How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.

Evidence groupFavorsReading
AIQ ScoreNot coveredNot covered
FundamentalsNot coveredNot covered
ValuationNot coveredNot covered
TechnicalsNot coveredNot covered
Risk ResilienceNot coveredNot covered
Analyst expectationsNot coveredNot covered

AIQ Decision Stability

Competitive

The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.

The full evidence

Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.

Compare YMAG and YMAX with others

Continue your research

This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.

How this comparison is scored

The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.

The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.

How to use side-by-side comparison →

This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.