Current etf page

ETF Data

IWMI ETF Data

Fund Profile · Snapshot Metrics · Exposure · Technicals · Risk

Financial ServicesAsset Management - IncomeScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

IWMINEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF

Financial Services / Asset Management - Income

Low Priority

In Line With Peers

NeutralEdge 4/10
$48.40−$0.44 (−0.89%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    36
  • Value
    56
  • Quality
    44
  • Risk resilience
    82
  • Sentiment
    —
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

ETF Data Overview

ETF pages show fund-native profile, cost, size, liquidity, exposure, technical, and risk evidence.

ETF profile fields
9
ETF metrics
8
Technical indicators
12
Risk measures
6

ETF Snapshot Data

Updated Oct 21, 2026.

Fund profile
FieldValue
Fund nameNEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
IssuerNeos
Asset classEquity
Primary exposureHealthcare (20.99%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateJun 24, 2024
NAV currencyUSD
CUSIP—
ISINUS78433H6348
Current ETF snapshot
FieldValue
Price$48.40
Fund size$260.06M
Expense ratio0.76%
Holdings count4
NAV$48.14
Average volume423.42K
Distribution yield15.08%
AIQ Score51/100

ETF Holdings

Reported holdings from the latest ETF holder snapshot.

Concentration
SymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
VTWOVanguard Russell 2000 ETF98.67%$1.25B
Cash&OtherCash & Other0.97%$12.3M
RUT 261016C03005000RUT US 10/16/26 C30050.23%-$2.96M
RUT 261016C03050000RUT US 10/16/26 C30500.13%-$1.58M

ETF Exposure

Sector and country composition fields from ETF snapshots where available.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Cash & Others0.01%
Basic Materials4.48%
Consumer Defensive2.63%
Industrials13.27%
Energy6.45%
Financial Services18.09%
Utilities2.71%
Communication Services2.26%
Healthcare20.99%
Technology13.76%
Real Estate6.48%
Consumer Cyclical8.87%
Country exposure
FieldValue
United States99.68%
Other0.32%

Institutional Holder Snapshot

Latest downstream filing-reported holders and share-count changes for this ETF.

No downstream institutional holder rows are available for this ETF yet.

Current ETF Metrics

ETF-native fields sit beside technical and risk readings for deeper research.

ETF metrics
MetricValue
Expense Ratio0.76%
Fund Size$260.06M
NAV$48.14
Average Volume423,424
Beta0.95
52-week high$53.86
52-week low$45.64

As of Oct 21, 2026

Technical indicators
MetricValue
Close$48.40
Volume265,723
RSI (14)43.55
MACD-0.62
MACD signal-0.65
MACD histogram0.03
ADX (14)39.96
SMA (50)$50.68
SMA (200)$50.85
ATR (14)$0.58
Historical volatility (annualized)12.61%
Volume (20-day average)459,821

As of Oct 21, 2026

Risk measures
MetricValue
Resilience score82/100
Beta0.95
Annual volatility15.33%
Max Drawdown-10.55%
Sharpe Ratio-0.34
VaR (95%, 1-day)-1.67%

As of Oct 21, 2026

Additional ETF Metrics

Expanded ETF structure fields appear here when the entitlement and source coverage allow them.

No additional ETF structure metrics are available.

IWMI ETF Data FAQ

What data matters most for IWMI ETF?

IWMI ETF data should be read through fund-native fields such as expense ratio, fund size, NAV, holdings, exposure, distribution yield, liquidity, technicals, and risk measures.

Why does IWMI not show revenue or EPS?

IWMI is an ETF, not an operating company. It does not have company revenue, EPS, margins, or free cash flow; those belong to the underlying holdings, not the fund wrapper.

What does IWMI's expense ratio show?

IWMI's expense ratio is the annual fund cost when available. It should be compared with fund strategy, income profile, liquidity, and exposure.

How should investors read IWMI's holdings data?

IWMI's holdings data shows what the fund owns and how concentrated the portfolio is. Holdings weights and sector exposure explain much of the fund's risk and return behavior.

What does IWMI's distribution yield mean?

IWMI's distribution yield describes the income paid by the ETF over the measured period. It should be read with payout history, fund strategy, fees, and price risk.

Why can ETF profile fields be unavailable?

ETF profile fields can be unavailable when the provider snapshot, serving layer, or entitlement path has not published that field for IWMI. Missing ETF fields should remain blank rather than be inferred from stock fundamentals.