Growth, filtered through the full composite
This list starts from AlgovestIQ's growth-leader universe — companies with expanding revenue and earnings trajectories — and ranks them by AIQ composite score rather than growth rate alone. The distinction is the whole point: raw growth-rate rankings systematically top-load unprofitable revenue buyers and post-blowup base effects. Requiring the composite means a growth name only ranks highly here when its momentum, quality, and risk profile support the growth story rather than merely accompanying it.
Durable growth investing has always been less about finding the fastest grower than about finding growth the market hasn't fully priced or doesn't fully trust. Score improvement on this list — visible in the Δ1d column and the risers panel — is often the trace of that trust arriving.
How to use this list
Two reading patterns pay off. First, persistence over position: a name holding the top 15 for weeks is a stronger signal than a name that spikes to #3 once. Second, watch the Risk column: growth leadership with deteriorating risk scores is the profile of a crowded trade late in its move, while growth with stable or improving Risk Resilience scores describes a different evidence mix. A change in the published list's median does not, by itself, establish crowding or predict how long leadership will persist.
FAQ
How does this differ from the momentum lists?
Overlap is real but incomplete: momentum measures trend behavior in the stock; growth membership reflects the business trajectory. Names appear here without top-tier price momentum when growth is strong but the stock is consolidating — frequently the more attractive entry profile of the two.
Is the growth universe fixed?
It refreshes with the underlying data pipeline. Companies age out as growth decelerates and enter as their trajectory establishes — the universe is a maintained classification, not a static index membership.