AEO vs INTC Stock Comparison
Compare AEO and INTC across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between AEO and INTC?
AEO leads the current stock comparison as American Eagle Outfitters, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. vs Intel Corp.
AEO leads
AEO leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 12 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support AEO, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors AEO over INTC, 48 versus 44 as of Sep 11, 2026. AEO's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while INTC holds the stronger momentum profile. AEO also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AEO today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. AEO lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 4 points over 30 sessions.
Compare American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare AEO and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum32 vs 77INTC +45
- Value68 vs 30AEO +38
- Risk Resilience37 vs 28AEO +9
- Quality46 vs 39AEO +7
4 of 6 evidence groups favor AEO. AEO’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; INTC keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -12
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -8
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
AEO's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AEO and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
AEO (American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
AEOAEO on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AEOAEO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
AEOAEO on the peer-relative Value factor, by 38 points.
Momentum
INTCINTC on the Momentum factor, by 45 points.
Lower downside
AEOAEO on Risk Resilience, by 9 points.
Analyst upside
AEOAEO on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AEO | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +26.5% | -0.1% | AEO has more room |
| Target dispersion | +31.6% | +136.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AEO. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | AEO | 48 vs 44 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth -32.1% vs 18.8%; EPS growth -73.1% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 17.2% vs -10.8%; gross margin 34.8% vs 38.9% |
| Valuation | AEO | Value 68 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -11.5% vs 4.2%; vs 200-day -22.6% vs 33.4% |
| Risk Resilience | AEO | Risk Resilience 37 vs 28 |
| Analyst expectations | AEO | Target upside 26.5% vs -0.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AEO and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on AEO.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10AEO lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 4 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- AEO +4
- 48 vs 44
- 7 sessions ago
- AEO +21
- 56 vs 35
- 30 sessions ago
- AEO +12
- 50 vs 38
- 90 sessions ago
- AEO +14
- 47 vs 33
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on May 5 when INTC moved ahead of AEO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (16.32%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (31.44%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
AEO leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 4 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +3.37%, AIQ -4 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.61%, AIQ -2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Value gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to AEO's edge.
- 2INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3AEO's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 4 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 4-point move would eliminate AEO's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | AEO | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -32.1% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -73.1% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 34.8% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 7.6% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 17.2% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 1.14 | 0.58 |
Performance
INTC leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | AEO | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -12.8% | 11.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -10.5% | -0.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -17.1% | -6.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -20% | 109.1% |
| Year to date | -41.7% | 171.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -14.8% | 309.8% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | AEO | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 39.4 | 61.3 |
| ADX (14) | 12.6 | 15.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -11.5% | 4.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | -22.6% | 33.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 63.4% | 58.9% |
Risk
AEO is the more resilient| Metric | AEO | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.35 | 2.89 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.2 | 2.12 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.28 | 3.98 |
| Max drawdown | -48.5% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -48.5% | -28.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 54% | 79.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.9% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AEO or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, AEO is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 48 against INTC's 44. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AEO or INTC the better buy right now?
AEO carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor AEO over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. INTC leads Momentum by 45 points; AEO leads Value by 38 points; AEO leads Risk Resilience by 9 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AEO or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +26.5% upside for AEO and -0.1% for INTC, so the Street currently favors AEO. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AEO or INTC?
AEO is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. AEO on the peer-relative Value factor, by 38 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AEO or INTC?
AEO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AEO or INTC?
INTC on the Momentum factor, by 45 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AEO or INTC?
AEO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AEO on Risk Resilience, by 9 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AEO more profitable than INTC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 34.8% vs 38.9%; operating margin 7.6% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 17.2% vs -10.8%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is AEO's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
AEO lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 4 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-05-05, when INTC moved ahead of AEO.
What would change the AEO vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Value gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to AEO's edge; INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; AEO's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 4 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 4-point move would eliminate AEO's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about AEO and INTC?
AEO: 1 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AEO is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AEO and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.