AMD vs INTC Stock Comparison
Compare AMD and INTC across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between AMD and INTC?
AMD leads the current stock comparison as Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. vs Intel Corp.
AMD leads
AMD leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience.
Fragile: 5 of 6 evidence groups support AMD, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors AMD over INTC, 42 versus 35 as of Sep 9, 2026. AMD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while INTC holds the stronger value profile. AMD also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AMD today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. AMD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare AMD and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality63 vs 39AMD +24
- Risk Resilience42 vs 29AMD +13
- Value24 vs 30INTC +6
- Momentum40 vs 40Even
5 of 6 evidence groups favor AMD. AMD’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; INTC keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-07, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-06.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
AMD's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AMD and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
AMD (Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on value, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
AMDAMD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AMDAMD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
INTCINTC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
AMDAMD on Risk Resilience, by 13 points.
Analyst upside
AMDAMD on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AMD | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +10.2% | -1.5% | AMD has more room |
| Target dispersion | +177.7% | +136.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 27 | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AMD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | AMD | 42 vs 35 |
| Fundamentals | AMDon balance | revenue growth 12.5% vs 18.8%; EPS growth 64.7% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 10.1% vs -10.8%; gross margin 53.2% vs 38.9% — AMD takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | INTC | Value 24 vs 30 |
| Technicals | AMD | Price vs 50-day 1.3% vs 3.8%; vs 200-day 40.1% vs 29.2% |
| Risk Resilience | AMD | Risk Resilience 42 vs 29 |
| Analyst expectations | AMD | Target upside 10.2% vs -1.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AMD and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on AMD.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 28 – Sep 7AMD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- AMD +7
- 42 vs 35
- 7 sessions ago
- AMD +9
- 42 vs 33
- 30 sessions ago
- AMD +8
- 49 vs 41
- 90 sessions ago
- AMD +5
- 45 vs 40
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (46.42%)
- Beta Spike Warning — bearish, risk, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.71%)
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (35.67%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.34%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
AMD leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +5.9%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +9.05%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to AMD's edge.
- 2INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3AMD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
AMD leads on balance| Metric | AMD | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 12.5% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 64.7% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 53.2% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 15.7% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.1% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.06 | 0.58 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | AMD | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.6% | 7.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.2% | -5.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 2.4% | -3.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 148.2% | 120.6% |
| Year to date | 123% | 159.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 194.6% | 299.2% |
Technicals
AMD has the stronger structure| Metric | AMD | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 40.1 | 37.6 |
| ADX (14) | 10.5 | 14.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | 1.3% | 3.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 40.1% | 29.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 46.4% | 47.7% |
Risk
AMD is the more resilient| Metric | AMD | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.15 | 2.91 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.81 | 2.06 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.17 | 3.84 |
| Max drawdown | -27.8% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -17.8% | -32% |
| Annualized volatility | 71.9% | 79.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.9% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AMD or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, AMD is the stronger of the two as of Sep 9, 2026, scoring 42 against INTC's 35. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AMD or INTC the better buy right now?
AMD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 9, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor AMD over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. AMD leads Quality by 24 points; AMD leads Risk Resilience by 13 points; INTC leads Value by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AMD or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +10.2% upside for AMD and -1.5% for INTC, so the Street currently favors AMD. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AMD or INTC?
INTC is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. INTC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AMD or INTC?
AMD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AMD or INTC?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AMD or INTC?
AMD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AMD on Risk Resilience, by 13 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AMD more profitable than INTC?
AMD leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 53.2% vs 38.9%; operating margin 15.7% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 10.1% vs -10.8%.
Is AMD's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
AMD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-28 and 2026-09-07. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the AMD vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to AMD's edge; INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; AMD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AMD and INTC?
AMD: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AMD is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AMD and INTC with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.