ALNY vs GOOGL Stock Comparison
GOOGL currently leads ALNY in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 55 vs 53. The clearest difference is risk resilience, while ALNY has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between ALNY and GOOGL?
GOOGL leads the current stock comparison as Alphabet Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Alphabet Inc.
GOOGL leads
GOOGL leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 23 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors ALNY on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support GOOGL, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Alphabet Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors GOOGL over ALNY, 55 versus 53 as of Oct 31, 2026. GOOGL's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and value, while ALNY holds the stronger momentum profile. GOOGL also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors ALNY. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor GOOGL today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. GOOGL lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 23 to 2 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Alphabet Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare ALNY and GOOGL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum50 vs 16ALNY +34
- Risk Resilience50 vs 74GOOGL +24
- Value25 vs 39GOOGL +14
- Quality86 vs 95GOOGL +9
3 of 6 evidence groups favor GOOGL. GOOGL’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and value; ALNY keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
GOOGL's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ALNY and GOOGL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
GOOGL (Alphabet Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and value.
ALNY (Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, fundamentals, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 40.9% against 22.1%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
GOOGLGOOGL on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
GOOGLGOOGL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
GOOGLGOOGL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 14 points.
Momentum
ALNYALNY on the Momentum factor, by 34 points.
Lower downside
GOOGLGOOGL on Risk Resilience, by 24 points.
Analyst upside
ALNYALNY on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors GOOGL, analyst targets favor ALNY. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | ALNY | GOOGL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +118.8% | +53.1% | ALNY has more room |
| Target dispersion | +70.6% | +31.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 13 | 15 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor GOOGL. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 53 vs 55 |
| Fundamentals | ALNYon balance | revenue growth 10.6% vs 9%; EPS growth -20.6% vs 78.5%; TTM ROE 93.6% vs 50.8%; gross margin 79.7% vs 60.9%; operating margin 20.8% vs 33.1% — ALNY takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | GOOGL | Value 25 vs 39 |
| Technicals | GOOGL | Price vs 50-day -31% vs -18.1%; vs 200-day -19.2% vs -4.8% |
| Risk Resilience | GOOGL | Risk Resilience 50 vs 74 |
| Analyst expectations | ALNY | Target upside 118.8% vs 53.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ALNY and GOOGL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on GOOGL.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28GOOGL lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 23 to 2 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- GOOGL +2
- 53 vs 55
- 7 sessions ago
- GOOGL +2
- 53 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- GOOGL +23
- 45 vs 68
- 90 sessions ago
- ALNY +3
- 58 vs 55
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Sep 10 when GOOGL moved ahead of ALNY.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only ALNY
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (20.20%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.73%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only GOOGL
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.09%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
GOOGL leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -5.17%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.4%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ALNY closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to GOOGL's edge.
- 2ALNY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3GOOGL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 21 points over 30 sessions, and a further 2-point move would eliminate GOOGL's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ALNY leads on balance| Metric | ALNY | GOOGL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 10.6% | 9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -20.6% | 78.5% |
| Gross margin | 79.7% | 60.9% |
| Operating margin | 20.8% | 33.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 93.6% | 50.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.94 | 0.18 |
Performance
GOOGL leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | ALNY | GOOGL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.2% | -2.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -5.8% | -5.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 4.9% | -2.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -22.8% | -7.2% |
| Year to date | -41.6% | 3.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -49.9% | 25.5% |
Technicals
GOOGL has the stronger structure| Metric | ALNY | GOOGL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 57.2 | 30.8 |
| ADX (14) | 10.4 | 20.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -31% | -18.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -19.2% | -4.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 40.9% | 22.1% |
Risk
GOOGL is the more resilient| Metric | ALNY | GOOGL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.43 | 1.37 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.31 | 0.65 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.39 | 1.09 |
| Max drawdown | -57.3% | -21.3% |
| Current drawdown | -51.7% | -19.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 48.2% | 31.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.6% | -2.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ALNY or GOOGL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, GOOGL is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 55 against ALNY's 53. The edge comes from risk resilience and value. ALNY is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ALNY or GOOGL the better buy right now?
GOOGL carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor GOOGL over ALNY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ALNY leads Momentum by 34 points; GOOGL leads Risk Resilience by 24 points; GOOGL leads Value by 14 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ALNY or GOOGL?
Analyst price targets imply +118.8% upside for ALNY and +53.1% for GOOGL, so the Street currently favors ALNY. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors GOOGL. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ALNY or GOOGL?
GOOGL is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. GOOGL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 14 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ALNY or GOOGL?
GOOGL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ALNY or GOOGL?
ALNY on the Momentum factor, by 34 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ALNY or GOOGL?
GOOGL is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. GOOGL on Risk Resilience, by 24 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ALNY more profitable than GOOGL?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 79.7% vs 60.9%; operating margin 20.8% vs 33.1%; ttm roe 93.6% vs 50.8%. ALNY leads on two measures and GOOGL on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is GOOGL's lead over ALNY getting stronger or weaker?
GOOGL lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 23 to 2 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-10, when GOOGL moved ahead of ALNY.
What would change the ALNY vs GOOGL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ALNY closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to GOOGL's edge; ALNY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; GOOGL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 21 points over 30 sessions, and a further 2-point move would eliminate GOOGL's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about ALNY and GOOGL?
ALNY: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. GOOGL: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ALNY is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On GOOGL it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare ALNY and GOOGL with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.