AMRC vs INTC Stock Comparison
AMRC currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 31 vs 30. The clearest difference is value, while INTC has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between AMRC and INTC?
AMRC leads the current stock comparison as Ameresco, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Ameresco, Inc. vs Intel Corp.
AMRC leads
AMRC leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from INTC.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support AMRC, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Ameresco, Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors AMRC over INTC, 31 versus 30 as of Oct 22, 2026. AMRC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while INTC holds the stronger quality profile. AMRC also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AMRC today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. AMRC lead: Reversed — INTC led by 11 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AMRC now leads by 1.
Compare Ameresco, Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare AMRC and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality17 vs 39INTC +22
- Value50 vs 30AMRC +20
- Momentum29 vs 21AMRC +8
- Risk Resilience25 vs 29INTC +4
3 of 6 evidence groups favor AMRC. AMRC’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; INTC keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
AMRC's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AMRC and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
AMRC (Ameresco, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on quality, risk resilience, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
AMRCAMRC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AMRCAMRC on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
AMRCAMRC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points.
Momentum
AMRCAMRC on the Momentum factor, by 8 points.
Lower downside
INTCINTC on Risk Resilience, by 4 points.
Analyst upside
AMRCAMRC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AMRC | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +125.6% | +25.7% | AMRC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +58.1% | +115.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 23 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AMRC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 31 vs 30 |
| Fundamentals | AMRCon balance | revenue growth 28.4% vs 18.8%; EPS growth 151.4% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 2.5% vs -10.8%; gross margin 16.1% vs 38.9% — AMRC takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | AMRC | Value 50 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -12.2% vs -9.6%; vs 200-day -30.4% vs 7.8% |
| Risk Resilience | INTC | Risk Resilience 25 vs 29 |
| Analyst expectations | AMRC | Target upside 125.6% vs 25.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AMRC and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on AMRC.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20AMRC lead: Reversed — INTC led by 11 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AMRC now leads by 1.
- Today
- AMRC +1
- 31 vs 30
- 7 sessions ago
- AMRC +2
- 32 vs 30
- 30 sessions ago
- INTC +11
- 32 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 42 vs 42
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Aug 12 when AMRC moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only AMRC
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (19.25%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Beta Spike Warning — bearish, risk, long horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (20.88%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, MACD Bearish Crossover.
AMRC leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +5.81%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.39%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Value gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to AMRC's edge.
- 2INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3AMRC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 4 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
AMRC leads on balance| Metric | AMRC | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 28.4% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 151.4% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 16.1% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 7% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 2.5% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 1.5 | 0.58 |
Performance
INTC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | AMRC | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -10.2% | -10.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -22.6% | -26% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -19.8% | -10.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -29.9% | 38.4% |
| Year to date | -33.4% | 148.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -56% | 148.9% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | AMRC | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 35.4 | 16.4 |
| ADX (14) | 21.1 | 23.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -12.2% | -9.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -30.4% | 7.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 49.3% | 46.6% |
Risk
INTC is the more resilient| Metric | AMRC | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.04 | 3.08 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.83 | 1.5 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.35 | 2.73 |
| Max drawdown | -56.4% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -55.9% | -34.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 68.5% | 77.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.5% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AMRC or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, AMRC is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 31 against INTC's 30. The edge comes from value and momentum. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AMRC or INTC the better buy right now?
AMRC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor AMRC over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. INTC leads Quality by 22 points; AMRC leads Value by 20 points; AMRC leads Momentum by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AMRC or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +125.6% upside for AMRC and +25.7% for INTC, so the Street currently favors AMRC. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AMRC or INTC?
AMRC is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. AMRC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AMRC or INTC?
AMRC on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AMRC or INTC?
AMRC on the Momentum factor, by 8 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AMRC or INTC?
INTC is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. INTC on Risk Resilience, by 4 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AMRC more profitable than INTC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 16.1% vs 38.9%; operating margin 7% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 2.5% vs -10.8%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is AMRC's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
AMRC lead: Reversed — INTC led by 11 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AMRC now leads by 1. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-12, when AMRC moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the AMRC vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Value gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to AMRC's edge; INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; AMRC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 4 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AMRC and INTC?
AMRC: 1 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AMRC is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AMRC and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.