AMZN vs INTC Stock Comparison
Amazon.com, Inc. vs Intel Corp.
AMZN leads
AMZN leads by 22 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support AMZN, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Amazon.com, Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors AMZN over INTC, 55 versus 33 as of Sep 5, 2026. AMZN's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. AMZN also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AMZN today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. AMZN lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 22 points over 30 sessions. AMZN leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Amazon.com, Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare AMZN and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality30%77 vs 39AMZN +38
- Risk Resilience15%54 vs 30AMZN +24
- Momentum25%54 vs 33AMZN +21
- Value30%35 vs 30AMZN +5
5 of 6 evidence groups favor AMZN. AMZN’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-03, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-02.
Largest factor move: Momentum +6
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
AMZN's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AMZN and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 45.1% against 26.9%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
AMZNAMZN on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
AMZNAMZN on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
AMZNAMZN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points.
Momentum
AMZNAMZN on the Momentum factor, by 21 points.
Lower downside
AMZNAMZN on Risk Resilience, by 24 points.
Analyst upside
AMZNAMZN on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AMZN | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +25.2% | +7.6% | AMZN has more room |
| Target dispersion | +35.5% | +135.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 30 | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AMZN. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | AMZN | 55 vs 33 |
| Fundamentals | AMZNon balance | revenue growth 10.5% vs 18.8%; EPS growth 106.4% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 30.5% vs -10.8%; gross margin 50.8% vs 38.9% — AMZN takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | AMZN | Value 35 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day 2% vs -5.5%; vs 200-day 8.3% vs 24.1% |
| Risk Resilience | AMZN | Risk Resilience 54 vs 30 |
| Analyst expectations | AMZN | Target upside 25.2% vs 7.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AMZN and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 22 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on AMZN.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 22 – Sep 3AMZN lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 22 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- AMZN +22
- 55 vs 33
- 7 sessions ago
- AMZN +17
- 51 vs 34
- 30 sessions ago
- AMZN +20
- 58 vs 38
- 90 sessions ago
- AMZN +4
- 49 vs 45
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Jun 23 when AMZN moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (5.99%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (37.24%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.65%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
AMZN leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.15%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.51%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to AMZN's edge.
- 2INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3AMZN's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
AMZN leads on balance| Metric | AMZN | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 10.5% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 106.4% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 50.8% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 12.1% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 30.5% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.4 | 0.58 |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | AMZN | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 46.4 | 30.6 |
| ADX (14) | 16.6 | 15.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | 2% | -5.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 8.3% | 24.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 26.9% | 45.1% |
Risk
AMZN is the more resilient| Metric | AMZN | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.44 | 2.93 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.45 | 2.04 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.84 | 3.79 |
| Max drawdown | -21.7% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -8.8% | -35% |
| Annualized volatility | 34.8% | 79.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.1% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AMZN or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, AMZN is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 55 against INTC's 33. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AMZN or INTC the better buy right now?
AMZN carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor AMZN over INTC?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. AMZN leads Quality by 38 points; AMZN leads Risk Resilience by 24 points; AMZN leads Momentum by 21 points. AMZN leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by INTC simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, AMZN or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +25.2% upside for AMZN and +7.6% for INTC, so the Street currently favors AMZN. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AMZN or INTC?
AMZN is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. AMZN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AMZN or INTC?
AMZN on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AMZN or INTC?
AMZN on the Momentum factor, by 21 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AMZN or INTC?
AMZN is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AMZN on Risk Resilience, by 24 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AMZN more profitable than INTC?
AMZN leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 50.8% vs 38.9%; operating margin 12.1% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 30.5% vs -10.8%.
Is AMZN's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
AMZN lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 22 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-22 and 2026-09-03. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-23, when AMZN moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the AMZN vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to AMZN's edge; INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; AMZN's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AMZN and INTC?
AMZN: 3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. INTC: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AMZN is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AMZN and INTC with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.