AS vs INTC Stock Comparison
AS currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 54 vs 30. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between AS and INTC?
AS leads the current stock comparison as Amer Sports, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Amer Sports, Inc. vs Intel Corp.
AS leads
AS leads by 24 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, and the lead has widened from 1 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support AS, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Amer Sports, Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors AS over INTC, 54 versus 30 as of Oct 21, 2026. AS's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality. AS also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AS today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the lead has swung materially session to session. AS lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 24 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Amer Sports, Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare AS and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum73 vs 21AS +52
- Quality63 vs 39AS +24
- Risk Resilience49 vs 29AS +20
- Value30 vs 30Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor AS. AS’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
AS's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AS and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
AS (Amer Sports, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 46.6% against 28.7%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ASAS on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
ASAS on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
ASAS on the Momentum factor, by 52 points.
Lower downside
ASAS on Risk Resilience, by 20 points.
Analyst upside
ASAS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AS | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +54.5% | +18.2% | AS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +67.8% | +122.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AS. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | AS | 54 vs 30 |
| Fundamentals | ASon balance | revenue growth -16.1% vs 18.8%; EPS growth -37.9% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 8.7% vs -10.8%; gross margin 59.8% vs 38.9% — AS takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 30 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day 1% vs -9.6%; vs 200-day -11% vs 7.8% |
| Risk Resilience | AS | Risk Resilience 49 vs 29 |
| Analyst expectations | AS | Target upside 54.5% vs 18.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AS and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 24 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on AS.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20AS lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 24 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- AS +24
- 54 vs 30
- 7 sessions ago
- AS +23
- 53 vs 30
- 30 sessions ago
- AS +1
- 44 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- INTC +3
- 39 vs 42
The lead changed hands 8 times in this window, most recently on Oct 5 when AS moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only AS
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (16.33%)
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (20.88%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.29%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
AS leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.41%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.39%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Momentum gap — currently 52 points behind, the largest single contributor to AS's edge.
- 2INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3AS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
AS leads on balance| Metric | AS | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -16.1% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -37.9% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 59.8% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 12.4% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 8.7% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.16 | 0.58 |
Performance
INTC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | AS | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.8% | -10.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 9.6% | -26% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -11.8% | -10.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -16.2% | 38.4% |
| Year to date | -18.8% | 148.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -1.1% | 148.9% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | AS | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 77.7 | 16.4 |
| ADX (14) | 23.5 | 23.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | 1% | -9.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -11% | 7.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 28.7% | 46.6% |
Risk
AS is the more resilient| Metric | AS | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.49 | 3.08 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.05 | 1.5 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.1 | 2.73 |
| Max drawdown | -37.4% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -27.8% | -34.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 39.7% | 77.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.8% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AS or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, AS is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 54 against INTC's 30. The edge comes from momentum and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AS or INTC the better buy right now?
AS carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor AS over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. AS leads Momentum by 52 points; AS leads Quality by 24 points; AS leads Risk Resilience by 20 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AS or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +54.5% upside for AS and +18.2% for INTC, so the Street currently favors AS. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AS or INTC?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AS or INTC?
AS on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AS or INTC?
AS on the Momentum factor, by 52 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AS or INTC?
AS is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AS on Risk Resilience, by 20 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AS more profitable than INTC?
AS leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 59.8% vs 38.9%; operating margin 12.4% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 8.7% vs -10.8%.
Is AS's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
AS lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 24 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 8 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-05, when AS moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the AS vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Momentum gap — currently 52 points behind, the largest single contributor to AS's edge; INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; AS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AS and INTC?
AS: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AS is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AS and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.