NVDA vs AVGO Stock Comparison
Compare NVDA and AVGO across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between NVDA and AVGO?
NVDA leads the current stock comparison as NVIDIA Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
NVIDIA Corporation vs Broadcom Inc.
NVDA leads
NVDA leads by 17 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, and the lead has widened from 11 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support NVDA, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
NVIDIA Corporation
Broadcom Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors NVDA over AVGO, 64 versus 47 as of Sep 9, 2026. NVDA's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality, while AVGO holds the stronger risk resilience profile. NVDA also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NVDA today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. NVDA lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 17 points over 30 sessions.
Compare NVIDIA Corporation and Broadcom Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare NVDA and AVGO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum68 vs 20NVDA +48
- Quality97 vs 85NVDA +12
- Risk Resilience47 vs 53AVGO +6
- Value35 vs 30NVDA +5
5 of 6 evidence groups favor NVDA. NVDA’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality; AVGO keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-07, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-06.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
NVDA's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — NVDA and AVGO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
AVGO (Broadcom Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
NVDANVDA on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AVGOAVGO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
NVDANVDA on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points.
Momentum
NVDANVDA on the Momentum factor, by 48 points.
Lower downside
AVGOAVGO on Risk Resilience, by 6 points.
Analyst upside
NVDANVDA on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | NVDA | AVGO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +45.9% | +36.9% | NVDA has more room |
| Target dispersion | +75.9% | +49.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 27 | 17 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NVDA. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | NVDA | 64 vs 47 |
| Fundamentals | NVDAon balance | revenue growth 17.9% vs 14.9%; EPS growth 2.9% vs 26.5%; TTM ROE 110.1% vs 36.4%; gross margin 74.7% vs 67%; operating margin 65.2% vs 43.7% — NVDA takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | NVDA | Value 35 vs 30 |
| Technicals | NVDA | Price vs 50-day 7.2% vs -3.9%; vs 200-day 17.1% vs -3.2% |
| Risk Resilience | AVGO | Risk Resilience 47 vs 53 |
| Analyst expectations | NVDA | Target upside 45.9% vs 36.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of NVDA and AVGO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 17 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on NVDA.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 28 – Sep 7NVDA lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 17 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- NVDA +17
- 64 vs 47
- 7 sessions ago
- NVDA +14
- 62 vs 48
- 30 sessions ago
- NVDA +11
- 69 vs 58
- 90 sessions ago
- NVDA +10
- 57 vs 47
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Jun 4 when NVDA moved ahead of AVGO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 0 bearish
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.06%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.8%)
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.74%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.64%)
AVGO is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.01%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.98%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AVGO closes the Momentum gap — currently 48 points behind, the largest single contributor to NVDA's edge.
- 2AVGO's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3NVDA's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
NVDA leads on balance| Metric | NVDA | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 17.9% | 14.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 2.9% | 26.5% |
| Gross margin | 74.7% | 67% |
| Operating margin | 65.2% | 43.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 110.1% | 36.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.17 | 0.74 |
Performance
NVDA leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | NVDA | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 5.9% | -3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.9% | -16.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 12.3% | -7.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 28.2% | 8.3% |
| Year to date | 23.5% | 3.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 35% | 18.4% |
Technicals
NVDA has the stronger structure| Metric | NVDA | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 53.7 | 29.2 |
| ADX (14) | 17.6 | 23.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | 7.2% | -3.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 17.1% | -3.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 45.5% | 35.2% |
Risk
AVGO is the more resilient| Metric | NVDA | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.96 | 2.15 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.86 | 0.48 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.46 | 0.73 |
| Max drawdown | -20.2% | -28.9% |
| Current drawdown | -2.3% | -25.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 38.6% | 48.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.9% | -4.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, NVDA or AVGO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, NVDA is the stronger of the two as of Sep 9, 2026, scoring 64 against AVGO's 47. The edge comes from momentum and quality. AVGO is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is NVDA or AVGO the better buy right now?
NVDA carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 9, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor NVDA over AVGO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. NVDA leads Momentum by 48 points; NVDA leads Quality by 12 points; AVGO leads Risk Resilience by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, NVDA or AVGO?
Analyst price targets imply +45.9% upside for NVDA and +36.9% for AVGO, so the Street currently favors NVDA. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, NVDA or AVGO?
NVDA is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. NVDA on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, NVDA or AVGO?
AVGO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, NVDA or AVGO?
NVDA on the Momentum factor, by 48 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, NVDA or AVGO?
AVGO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AVGO on Risk Resilience, by 6 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is NVDA more profitable than AVGO?
NVDA leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 74.7% vs 67%; operating margin 65.2% vs 43.7%; ttm roe 110.1% vs 36.4%.
Is NVDA's lead over AVGO getting stronger or weaker?
NVDA lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 17 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-28 and 2026-09-07. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-04, when NVDA moved ahead of AVGO.
What would change the NVDA vs AVGO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AVGO closes the Momentum gap — currently 48 points behind, the largest single contributor to NVDA's edge; AVGO's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; NVDA's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about NVDA and AVGO?
NVDA: 5 bullish / 0 bearish. AVGO: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on NVDA is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On AVGO it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare NVDA and AVGO with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.