AZO vs INTC Stock Comparison
Compare AZO and INTC across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between AZO and INTC?
AZO leads the current stock comparison as AutoZone, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
AutoZone, Inc. vs Intel Corp.
AZO leads
AZO leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality, and the lead has widened from 4 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support AZO, and its lead is widening.
AutoZone, Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors AZO over INTC, 42 versus 35 as of Sep 6, 2026. AZO's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while INTC holds the stronger momentum profile. AZO also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AZO today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. AZO lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
Compare AutoZone, Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare AZO and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience15%44 vs 29AZO +15
- Quality30%53 vs 39AZO +14
- Momentum25%32 vs 40INTC +8
- Value30%37 vs 30AZO +7
4 of 6 evidence groups favor AZO. AZO’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; INTC keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-05, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-04.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
AZO's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AZO and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
AZO (AutoZone, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 47.7% against 21.7%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
AZOAZO on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
AZOAZO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
AZOAZO on the peer-relative Value factor, by 7 points.
Momentum
INTCINTC on the Momentum factor, by 8 points.
Lower downside
AZOAZO on Risk Resilience, by 15 points.
Analyst upside
AZOAZO on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AZO | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +24.4% | +7.4% | AZO has more room |
| Target dispersion | +22.2% | +136.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AZO. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | AZO | 42 vs 35 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 13.3% vs 18.8%; EPS growth 37.7% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE -80.4% vs -10.8%; gross margin 51.8% vs 38.9% |
| Valuation | AZO | Value 37 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -1.7% vs -4.8%; vs 200-day -11.8% vs 29.2% |
| Risk Resilience | AZO | Risk Resilience 44 vs 29 |
| Analyst expectations | AZO | Target upside 24.4% vs 7.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AZO and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on AZO.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 24 – Sep 5AZO lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- AZO +7
- 42 vs 35
- 7 sessions ago
- AZO +5
- 39 vs 34
- 30 sessions ago
- AZO +4
- 45 vs 41
- 90 sessions ago
- AZO +9
- 49 vs 40
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Jun 9 when AZO moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 4 bearish
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (11.37%)
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (1.1%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (35.67%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.34%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.51%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.51%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to AZO's edge.
- 2INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3AZO starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | AZO | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 13.3% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 37.7% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 51.8% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 18% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -80.4% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | -4.54 | 0.58 |
Performance
INTC leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | AZO | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.7% | 7.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -4.6% | -5.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -4.3% | -3.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -18.1% | 120.6% |
| Year to date | -12% | 159.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -28.8% | 299.2% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | AZO | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 46.4 | 37.6 |
| ADX (14) | 10 | 14.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.7% | -4.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -11.8% | 29.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 21.7% | 47.7% |
Risk
AZO is the more resilient| Metric | AZO | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.12 | 2.91 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.19 | 2.06 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.54 | 3.84 |
| Max drawdown | -32.9% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -31.5% | -32% |
| Annualized volatility | 29.2% | 79.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AZO or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, AZO is the stronger of the two as of Sep 6, 2026, scoring 42 against INTC's 35. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AZO or INTC the better buy right now?
AZO carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 6, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor AZO over INTC?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. AZO leads Risk Resilience by 15 points; AZO leads Quality by 14 points; INTC leads Momentum by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AZO or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +24.4% upside for AZO and +7.4% for INTC, so the Street currently favors AZO. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AZO or INTC?
AZO is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. AZO on the peer-relative Value factor, by 7 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AZO or INTC?
AZO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AZO or INTC?
INTC on the Momentum factor, by 8 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AZO or INTC?
AZO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AZO on Risk Resilience, by 15 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AZO more profitable than INTC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 51.8% vs 38.9%; operating margin 18% vs 0.1%; ttm roe -80.4% vs -10.8%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is AZO's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
AZO lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 7 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-24 and 2026-09-05. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-09, when AZO moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the AZO vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to AZO's edge; INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; AZO starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AZO and INTC?
AZO: 0 bullish / 4 bearish. INTC: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on AZO is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AZO and INTC with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.