BA vs CARR Stock Comparison
CARR currently leads BA in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 50 vs 46. The clearest difference is value, while BA has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between BA and CARR?
CARR leads the current stock comparison as Carrier Global Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
The Boeing Company vs Carrier Global Corporation
CARR leads
CARR leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Value. Wall Street currently favors BA on target upside.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support CARR, and its current signal state is conflicted.
The Boeing Company
Carrier Global Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CARR over BA, 50 versus 46 as of Oct 21, 2026. CARR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while BA holds the stronger quality profile. CARR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors BA. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CARR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. CARR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
Compare The Boeing Company and Carrier Global Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BA and CARR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value40 vs 59CARR +19
- Quality42 vs 36BA +6
- Risk Resilience56 vs 58Even
- Momentum51 vs 50Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor CARR. CARR’s edge is concentrated in value; BA keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +9
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
CARR's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BA and CARR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
CARR (Carrier Global Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
BA (The Boeing Company): the counter-case, on quality, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 32.9% against 18.6%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CARRCARR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
CARRCARR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
CARRCARR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
CARRCARR carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
BABA on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors CARR, analyst targets favor BA. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BA | CARR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +41.5% | +27.5% | BA has more room |
| Target dispersion | +29.4% | +26.4% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CARR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | CARR | 46 vs 50 |
| Fundamentals | CARRon balance | revenue growth 10.5% vs 18.9%; EPS growth -5.1% vs 106.9%; TTM ROE 104.8% vs 8.9%; gross margin 4.7% vs 24.3%; operating margin -5.4% vs 7.1% — CARR takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | CARR | Value 40 vs 59 |
| Technicals | CARR | Price vs 50-day -5.6% vs -1.6%; vs 200-day -13.1% vs -9% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 56 vs 58 |
| Analyst expectations | BA | Target upside 41.5% vs 27.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BA and CARR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CARR.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20CARR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- CARR +4
- 46 vs 50
- 7 sessions ago
- CARR +5
- 41 vs 46
- 30 sessions ago
- CARR +6
- 38 vs 44
- 90 sessions ago
- BA +2
- 48 vs 46
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Aug 20 when CARR moved ahead of BA.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only CARR
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, Downtrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
CARR leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.95%, AIQ +1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.53%, AIQ +3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BA closes the Value gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to CARR's edge.
- 2BA's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3CARR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
CARR leads on balance| Metric | BA | CARR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 10.5% | 18.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -5.1% | 106.9% |
| Gross margin | 4.7% | 24.3% |
| Operating margin | -5.4% | 7.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 104.8% | 8.9% |
| Debt to equity | 7.52 | 0.94 |
Performance
CARR leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | BA | CARR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.7% | 1.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -8.7% | -17.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -13.1% | -9% |
| Year to date | -12.3% | 6.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -10.1% | -1.7% |
Technicals
CARR has the stronger structure| Metric | BA | CARR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 57.5 | 59.5 |
| ADX (14) | 27.8 | 17.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.6% | -1.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -13.1% | -9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 32.9% | 18.6% |
Risk
Split| Metric | BA | CARR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.23 | 1.31 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.27 | 0.07 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.46 | 0.09 |
| Max drawdown | -26.9% | -29.1% |
| Current drawdown | -24.5% | -26.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 34.1% | 35.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.2% | -3.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BA or CARR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CARR is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 50 against BA's 46. The edge comes from value. BA is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BA or CARR the better buy right now?
CARR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CARR over BA?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. CARR leads Value by 19 points; BA leads Quality by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BA or CARR?
Analyst price targets imply +41.5% upside for BA and +27.5% for CARR, so the Street currently favors BA. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors CARR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BA or CARR?
CARR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. CARR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BA or CARR?
CARR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BA or CARR?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BA or CARR?
CARR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. CARR carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BA more profitable than CARR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 4.7% vs 24.3%; operating margin -5.4% vs 7.1%; ttm roe 104.8% vs 8.9%. BA leads on one measure and CARR on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is CARR's lead over BA getting stronger or weaker?
CARR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-20, when CARR moved ahead of BA.
What would change the BA vs CARR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BA closes the Value gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to CARR's edge; BA's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; CARR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BA and CARR?
BA: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. CARR: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BA is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On CARR it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare BA and CARR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.