BA vs XLI Stock Comparison
XLI currently leads BA in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 54 vs 46. The clearest difference is quality, while BA has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between BA and XLI?
XLI leads the current stock comparison as State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
The Boeing Company vs State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF
XLI leads
XLI leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 14 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 3 of 4 evidence groups support XLI, its lead is narrowing, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
The Boeing Company
State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors XLI over BA, 54 versus 46 as of Oct 21, 2026. XLI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while BA holds the stronger momentum profile. XLI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor XLI today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. XLI lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 14 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare The Boeing Company and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BA and XLI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality42 vs 68XLI +26
- Risk Resilience56 vs 81XLI +25
- Momentum51 vs 41BA +10
- Value40 vs 36BA +4
3 of 4 evidence groups favor XLI. XLI’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; BA keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
XLI's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BA and XLI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
XLI (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
BA (The Boeing Company): the counter-case, on momentum, value, valuation — but at materially higher volatility, 32.9% against 13.2%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
XLIXLI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
BABA on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
BABA on the Momentum factor, by 10 points.
Lower downside
XLIXLI on Risk Resilience, by 25 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | BA | XLI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +41.5% | — | Level |
| Target dispersion | +29.4% | — | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | — | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | — | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor XLI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | XLI | 46 vs 54 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | BA | Value 40 vs 36 |
| Technicals | XLI | Price vs 50-day -5.6% vs -2.9%; vs 200-day -13.1% vs -3.6% |
| Risk Resilience | XLI | Risk Resilience 56 vs 81 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BA and XLI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on XLI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20XLI lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 14 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- XLI +8
- 46 vs 54
- 7 sessions ago
- XLI +11
- 41 vs 52
- 30 sessions ago
- XLI +14
- 38 vs 52
- 90 sessions ago
- XLI +13
- 48 vs 61
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only BA
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (7.62%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral
Only XLI
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.18%)
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (1.50%)
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bullish Crossover.
BA is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.95%, AIQ +1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.91%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BA closes the Quality gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to XLI's edge.
- 2BA's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3XLI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 8-point move would eliminate XLI's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | BA | XLI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 10.5% | — |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -5.1% | — |
| Gross margin | 4.7% | — |
| Operating margin | -5.4% | — |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 104.8% | — |
| Debt to equity | 7.52 | — |
Performance
XLI leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | BA | XLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.1% | -1.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.7% | -2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -8.7% | -6.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -13.1% | -2.7% |
| Year to date | -12.3% | 7.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -10.1% | 10% |
Technicals
XLI has the stronger structure| Metric | BA | XLI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 57.5 | 49.4 |
| ADX (14) | 27.8 | 28 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.6% | -2.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | -13.1% | -3.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 32.9% | 13.2% |
Risk
XLI is the more resilient| Metric | BA | XLI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.23 | 0.93 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.27 | 0.41 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.46 | 0.65 |
| Max drawdown | -26.9% | -12.5% |
| Current drawdown | -24.5% | -10.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 34.1% | 17.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.2% | -1.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BA or XLI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, XLI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 54 against BA's 46. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. BA is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BA or XLI the better buy right now?
XLI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor XLI over BA?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. XLI leads Quality by 26 points; XLI leads Risk Resilience by 25 points; BA leads Momentum by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BA or XLI?
Analyst price targets imply +41.5% upside for BA and not covered for XLI. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BA or XLI?
BA is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BA on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BA or XLI?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BA or XLI?
BA on the Momentum factor, by 10 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BA or XLI?
XLI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. XLI on Risk Resilience, by 25 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BA more profitable than XLI?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is XLI's lead over BA getting stronger or weaker?
XLI lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 14 to 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the BA vs XLI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BA closes the Quality gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to XLI's edge; BA's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; XLI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 8-point move would eliminate XLI's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about BA and XLI?
BA: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. XLI: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BA is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On XLI it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.