BKR vs INTC Stock Comparison
BKR currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 43 vs 31. The clearest difference is risk resilience.
What is the main difference between BKR and INTC?
BKR leads the current stock comparison as Baker Hughes Company, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Baker Hughes Company vs Intel Corp.
BKR leads
BKR leads by 12 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from INTC. Wall Street currently favors INTC on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support BKR, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Baker Hughes Company
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BKR over INTC, 43 versus 31 as of Oct 24, 2026. BKR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and momentum. BKR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors INTC. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BKR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. BKR lead: Reversed — INTC led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; BKR now leads by 12. BKR leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Baker Hughes Company and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BKR and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience65 vs 28BKR +37
- Momentum37 vs 23BKR +14
- Quality45 vs 39BKR +6
- Value35 vs 30BKR +5
3 of 6 evidence groups favor BKR. BKR’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-23, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-22.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
BKR's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BKR and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BKR (Baker Hughes Company): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and momentum.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 50.4% against 32.4%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BKRBKR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BKRBKR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BKRBKR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points.
Momentum
BKRBKR on the Momentum factor, by 14 points.
Lower downside
BKRBKR on Risk Resilience, by 37 points.
Analyst upside
INTCINTC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors BKR, analyst targets favor INTC. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BKR | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +28.5% | +34.4% | INTC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +40.4% | +115.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 12 | 23 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BKR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | BKR | 43 vs 31 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 2.4% vs 18.8%; EPS growth -26.6% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 16.3% vs -10.8%; gross margin 23.6% vs 38.9% |
| Valuation | BKR | Value 35 vs 30 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -5.3% vs -14.8%; vs 200-day -7% vs 1.9% |
| Risk Resilience | BKR | Risk Resilience 65 vs 28 |
| Analyst expectations | INTC | Target upside 28.5% vs 34.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BKR and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 12 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BKR.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 24 – Oct 23BKR lead: Reversed — INTC led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; BKR now leads by 12.
- Today
- BKR +12
- 43 vs 31
- 7 sessions ago
- BKR +11
- 41 vs 30
- 30 sessions ago
- INTC +2
- 43 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- BKR +14
- 51 vs 37
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 5 when BKR moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only BKR
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (1.89%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (18.99%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.46%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
BKR leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +4.18%, AIQ +1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.72%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to BKR's edge.
- 2INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3BKR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | BKR | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.4% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -26.6% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 23.6% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 12.9% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 16.3% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.82 | 0.58 |
Performance
INTC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | BKR | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.3% | -3.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.4% | -29.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -7.8% | -5.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -13% | 23.8% |
| Year to date | 22.7% | 135.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 19.5% | 128.1% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | BKR | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 44 | 16.2 |
| ADX (14) | 20.1 | 26.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.3% | -14.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -7% | 1.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 32.4% | 50.4% |
Risk
BKR is the more resilient| Metric | BKR | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.67 | 3.1 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.55 | 1.43 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.84 | 2.58 |
| Max drawdown | -24.2% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -19.8% | -38.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 33.3% | 78.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.6% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BKR or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BKR is the stronger of the two as of Oct 24, 2026, scoring 43 against INTC's 31. The edge comes from risk resilience and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BKR or INTC the better buy right now?
BKR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 24, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BKR over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BKR leads Risk Resilience by 37 points; BKR leads Momentum by 14 points; BKR leads Quality by 6 points. BKR leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by INTC simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, BKR or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +28.5% upside for BKR and +34.4% for INTC, so the Street currently favors INTC. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors BKR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BKR or INTC?
BKR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BKR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BKR or INTC?
BKR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BKR or INTC?
BKR on the Momentum factor, by 14 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BKR or INTC?
BKR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BKR on Risk Resilience, by 37 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BKR more profitable than INTC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 23.6% vs 38.9%; operating margin 12.9% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 16.3% vs -10.8%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is BKR's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
BKR lead: Reversed — INTC led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; BKR now leads by 12. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-24 and 2026-10-23. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-05, when BKR moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the BKR vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to BKR's edge; INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; BKR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BKR and INTC?
BKR: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BKR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare BKR and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.