BUR vs INTC Stock Comparison
BUR currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 38 vs 30. The clearest difference is value, while INTC has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between BUR and INTC?
BUR leads the current stock comparison as Burford Capital Limited, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Burford Capital Limited vs Intel Corp.
BUR leads
BUR leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 2 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors INTC on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support BUR, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Burford Capital Limited
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BUR over INTC, 38 versus 30 as of Nov 1, 2026. BUR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while INTC holds the stronger quality profile. BUR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors INTC. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BUR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. BUR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Burford Capital Limited and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BUR and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality0 vs 39INTC +39
- Value69 vs 30BUR +39
- Momentum39 vs 19BUR +20
- Risk Resilience47 vs 28BUR +19
3 of 6 evidence groups favor BUR. BUR’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; INTC keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-30, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-29.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -15
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
BUR's lead widened by 3 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BUR and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BUR (Burford Capital Limited): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 110.6% against 63.1%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BURBUR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BURBUR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BURBUR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 39 points.
Momentum
BURBUR on the Momentum factor, by 20 points.
Lower downside
BURBUR on Risk Resilience, by 19 points.
Analyst upside
INTCINTC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors BUR, analyst targets favor INTC. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BUR | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +47.1% | +76.7% | INTC has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +107.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 25 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BUR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | BUR | 38 vs 30 |
| Fundamentals | INTC | TTM ROE -77.3% vs -10.8%; gross margin -15.5% vs 38.9% |
| Valuation | BUR | Value 69 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -10.9% vs -35%; vs 200-day -36.8% vs 0% |
| Risk Resilience | BUR | Risk Resilience 47 vs 28 |
| Analyst expectations | INTC | Target upside 47.1% vs 76.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BUR and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BUR.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jul 1 – Oct 30BUR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- BUR +8
- 38 vs 30
- 7 sessions ago
- BUR +6
- 37 vs 31
- 30 sessions ago
- BUR +2
- 36 vs 34
- 90 sessions ago
- BUR +27
- 61 vs 34
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Oct 9 when BUR moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only BUR
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (41.00%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
3 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (16.39%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode.
BUR leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.58%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -28.58%, AIQ -3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Value gap — currently 39 points behind, the largest single contributor to BUR's edge.
- 2INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3BUR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
INTC leads on balance| Metric | BUR | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 0% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | -15.5% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 107.1% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -77.3% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 2.95 | 0.58 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | BUR | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.2% | -18.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -6.8% | -33.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -20% | -27.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -34.6% | 0.3% |
| Year to date | -61.9% | 78.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -66.2% | 95.4% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | BUR | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 47.1 | 22.8 |
| ADX (14) | 24.9 | 27.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -10.9% | -35% |
| Price vs 200-day | -36.8% | 0% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 63.1% | 110.6% |
Risk
BUR is the more resilient| Metric | BUR | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.12 | 3.36 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.1 | 0.97 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.08 | 1.43 |
| Max drawdown | -69.8% | -53.3% |
| Current drawdown | -65.8% | -53.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 69.7% | 83.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.5% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BUR or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BUR is the stronger of the two as of Nov 1, 2026, scoring 38 against INTC's 30. The edge comes from value and momentum. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BUR or INTC the better buy right now?
BUR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Nov 1, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BUR over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. INTC leads Quality by 39 points; BUR leads Value by 39 points; BUR leads Momentum by 20 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BUR or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +47.1% upside for BUR and +76.7% for INTC, so the Street currently favors INTC. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors BUR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BUR or INTC?
BUR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BUR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 39 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BUR or INTC?
BUR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BUR or INTC?
BUR on the Momentum factor, by 20 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BUR or INTC?
BUR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BUR on Risk Resilience, by 19 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BUR more profitable than INTC?
INTC leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin -15.5% vs 38.9%; operating margin 107.1% vs 0.1%; ttm roe -77.3% vs -10.8%.
Is BUR's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
BUR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-07-01 and 2026-10-30. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-09, when BUR moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the BUR vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Value gap — currently 39 points behind, the largest single contributor to BUR's edge; INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; BUR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BUR and INTC?
BUR: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 3 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BUR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare BUR and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.