CAMT vs INTC Stock Comparison
CAMT currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 34 vs 30. The clearest difference is risk resilience, while INTC has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between CAMT and INTC?
CAMT leads the current stock comparison as Camtek Ltd., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Camtek Ltd. vs Intel Corp.
CAMT leads
CAMT leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality.
Competitive: 5 of 6 evidence groups support CAMT, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Camtek Ltd.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CAMT over INTC, 34 versus 30 as of Oct 21, 2026. CAMT's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while INTC holds the stronger momentum profile. CAMT also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CAMT today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. CAMT lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Camtek Ltd. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare CAMT and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience41 vs 29CAMT +12
- Quality48 vs 39CAMT +9
- Momentum15 vs 21INTC +6
- Value34 vs 30CAMT +4
5 of 6 evidence groups favor CAMT. CAMT’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; INTC keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
CAMT's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — CAMT and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
CAMT (Camtek Ltd.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CAMTCAMT on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
CAMTCAMT on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
CAMTCAMT on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
INTCINTC on the Momentum factor, by 6 points.
Lower downside
CAMTCAMT on Risk Resilience, by 12 points.
Analyst upside
CAMTCAMT on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | CAMT | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +31.8% | +18.2% | CAMT has more room |
| Target dispersion | +27.4% | +122.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CAMT. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | CAMT | 34 vs 30 |
| Fundamentals | CAMTon balance | revenue growth 9.5% vs 18.8%; EPS growth -26.5% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 5.8% vs -10.8%; gross margin 50.1% vs 38.9% — CAMT takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | CAMT | Value 34 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -9.5% vs -9.6%; vs 200-day -18.2% vs 7.8% |
| Risk Resilience | CAMT | Risk Resilience 41 vs 29 |
| Analyst expectations | CAMT | Target upside 31.8% vs 18.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CAMT and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CAMT.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20CAMT lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- CAMT +4
- 34 vs 30
- 7 sessions ago
- CAMT +7
- 37 vs 30
- 30 sessions ago
- CAMT +3
- 46 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- CAMT +9
- 51 vs 42
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Sep 29 when CAMT moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only CAMT
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (7.27%)
- Beta Spike Warning — bearish, risk, long horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (20.88%)
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Keltner Channel Breakdown, RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce, MACD Bearish Crossover.
CAMT leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.06%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.39%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 12 points behind, the largest single contributor to CAMT's edge.
- 2INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3CAMT's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 5 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
CAMT leads on balance| Metric | CAMT | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9.5% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -26.5% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 50.1% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 23.2% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 5.8% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.69 | 0.58 |
Performance
INTC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | CAMT | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -10.4% | -10.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -15.5% | -26% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -18.4% | -10.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -28.4% | 38.4% |
| Year to date | 20.3% | 148.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 4.6% | 148.9% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | CAMT | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 25 | 16.4 |
| ADX (14) | 15.9 | 23.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -9.5% | -9.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -18.2% | 7.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 52.6% | 46.6% |
Risk
CAMT is the more resilient| Metric | CAMT | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.73 | 3.08 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.38 | 1.5 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.57 | 2.73 |
| Max drawdown | -38.8% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -38.4% | -34.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 69.7% | 77.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -7.4% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CAMT or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CAMT is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 34 against INTC's 30. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CAMT or INTC the better buy right now?
CAMT carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CAMT over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. CAMT leads Risk Resilience by 12 points; CAMT leads Quality by 9 points; INTC leads Momentum by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, CAMT or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +31.8% upside for CAMT and +18.2% for INTC, so the Street currently favors CAMT. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CAMT or INTC?
CAMT is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. CAMT on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CAMT or INTC?
CAMT on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CAMT or INTC?
INTC on the Momentum factor, by 6 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CAMT or INTC?
CAMT is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. CAMT on Risk Resilience, by 12 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CAMT more profitable than INTC?
CAMT leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 50.1% vs 38.9%; operating margin 23.2% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 5.8% vs -10.8%.
Is CAMT's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
CAMT lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-29, when CAMT moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the CAMT vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 12 points behind, the largest single contributor to CAMT's edge; INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; CAMT's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 5 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about CAMT and INTC?
CAMT: 1 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on CAMT is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare CAMT and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.