CBOE vs INTC Stock Comparison
Compare CBOE and INTC across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between CBOE and INTC?
CBOE leads the current stock comparison as Cboe Global Markets, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Cboe Global Markets, Inc. vs Intel Corp.
CBOE leads
CBOE leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support CBOE.
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CBOE over INTC, 50 versus 44 as of Sep 11, 2026. CBOE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while INTC holds the stronger momentum profile. CBOE also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CBOE today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability.
Compare Cboe Global Markets, Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare CBOE and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality75 vs 39CBOE +36
- Momentum50 vs 77INTC +27
- Risk Resilience49 vs 28CBOE +21
- Value26 vs 30INTC +4
4 of 6 evidence groups favor CBOE. CBOE’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; INTC keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
The central trade-off
CBOE (Cboe Global Markets, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, value, valuation — but at materially higher volatility, 58.9% against 35.7%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CBOECBOE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
CBOECBOE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
INTCINTC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
INTCINTC on the Momentum factor, by 27 points.
Lower downside
CBOECBOE on Risk Resilience, by 21 points.
Analyst upside
CBOECBOE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | CBOE | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +16.4% | -0.1% | CBOE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +41.9% | +136.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CBOE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | CBOE | 50 vs 44 |
| Fundamentals | CBOEon balance | revenue growth 13.4% vs 18.8%; EPS growth -8.4% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 25.7% vs -10.8%; gross margin 52.3% vs 38.9% — CBOE takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | INTC | Value 26 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -2.2% vs 4.2%; vs 200-day 0.6% vs 33.4% |
| Risk Resilience | CBOE | Risk Resilience 49 vs 28 |
| Analyst expectations | CBOE | Target upside 16.4% vs -0.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CBOE and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CBOE.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to CBOE's edge.
- 2INTC generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3CBOE starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
CBOE leads on balance| Metric | CBOE | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 13.4% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -8.4% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 52.3% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 35.2% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 25.7% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.28 | 0.58 |
Performance
INTC leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | CBOE | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.3% | 11.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.2% | -0.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -4.5% | -6.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 1.2% | 109.1% |
| Year to date | 14.5% | 171.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 22.7% | 309.8% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | CBOE | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 45.3 | 61.3 |
| ADX (14) | 15.2 | 15.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -2.2% | 4.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.6% | 33.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 35.7% | 58.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CBOE or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CBOE is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 50 against INTC's 44. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CBOE or INTC the better buy right now?
CBOE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CBOE over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. CBOE leads Quality by 36 points; INTC leads Momentum by 27 points; CBOE leads Risk Resilience by 21 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, CBOE or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +16.4% upside for CBOE and -0.1% for INTC, so the Street currently favors CBOE. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CBOE or INTC?
INTC is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. INTC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CBOE or INTC?
CBOE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CBOE or INTC?
INTC on the Momentum factor, by 27 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CBOE or INTC?
CBOE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. CBOE on Risk Resilience, by 21 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CBOE more profitable than INTC?
CBOE leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 52.3% vs 38.9%; operating margin 35.2% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 25.7% vs -10.8%.
What would change the CBOE vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to CBOE's edge; INTC generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; CBOE starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
Compare CBOE and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.