CBRE vs INTC Stock Comparison
CBRE currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 49 vs 30. The clearest difference is value.
What is the main difference between CBRE and INTC?
CBRE leads the current stock comparison as CBRE Group, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
CBRE Group, Inc. vs Intel Corp.
CBRE leads
CBRE leads by 19 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 10 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors INTC on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support CBRE, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
CBRE Group, Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CBRE over INTC, 49 versus 30 as of Oct 31, 2026. CBRE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum. CBRE also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors INTC. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CBRE today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. CBRE lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 19 points over 30 sessions.
Compare CBRE Group, Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare CBRE and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value68 vs 30CBRE +38
- Momentum40 vs 19CBRE +21
- Risk Resilience49 vs 28CBRE +21
- Quality36 vs 39Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor CBRE. CBRE’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-30, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-29.
Largest factor move: Momentum +10
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -15
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
CBRE's lead widened by 6 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — CBRE and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
CBRE (CBRE Group, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 110.6% against 39.5%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CBRECBRE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
CBRECBRE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
CBRECBRE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 38 points.
Momentum
CBRECBRE on the Momentum factor, by 21 points.
Lower downside
CBRECBRE on Risk Resilience, by 21 points.
Analyst upside
INTCINTC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors CBRE, analyst targets favor INTC. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | CBRE | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +37.4% | +76.7% | INTC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +7.9% | +107.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 25 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CBRE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | CBRE | 49 vs 30 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 2.6% vs 18.8%; EPS growth 121.7% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 16% vs -10.8%; gross margin 17.5% vs 38.9% |
| Valuation | CBRE | Value 68 vs 30 |
| Technicals | CBRE | Price vs 50-day -5.5% vs -35%; vs 200-day -9.1% vs 0% |
| Risk Resilience | CBRE | Risk Resilience 49 vs 28 |
| Analyst expectations | INTC | Target upside 37.4% vs 76.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CBRE and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 19 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CBRE.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jul 1 – Oct 30CBRE lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 19 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- CBRE +19
- 49 vs 30
- 7 sessions ago
- CBRE +16
- 47 vs 31
- 30 sessions ago
- CBRE +10
- 44 vs 34
- 90 sessions ago
- CBRE +19
- 53 vs 34
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Oct 6 when CBRE moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only CBRE
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.89%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
3 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (16.39%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (9.68%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
CBRE leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.21%, AIQ +3 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -28.58%, AIQ -3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Value gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to CBRE's edge.
- 2INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3CBRE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | CBRE | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.6% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 121.7% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 17.5% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 3.7% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 16% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 1.21 | 0.58 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | CBRE | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 4.5% | -18.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.6% | -33.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -13.2% | -27.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -9.1% | 0.3% |
| Year to date | -19.9% | 78.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -15.6% | 95.4% |
Technicals
CBRE has the stronger structure| Metric | CBRE | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 47.5 | 22.8 |
| ADX (14) | 17.6 | 27.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.5% | -35% |
| Price vs 200-day | -9.1% | 0% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 39.5% | 110.6% |
Risk
CBRE is the more resilient| Metric | CBRE | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.91 | 3.36 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.45 | 0.97 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.6 | 1.43 |
| Max drawdown | -29.1% | -53.3% |
| Current drawdown | -24.9% | -53.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 34.1% | 83.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.2% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CBRE or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CBRE is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 49 against INTC's 30. The edge comes from value and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CBRE or INTC the better buy right now?
CBRE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CBRE over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. CBRE leads Value by 38 points; CBRE leads Momentum by 21 points; CBRE leads Risk Resilience by 21 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, CBRE or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +37.4% upside for CBRE and +76.7% for INTC, so the Street currently favors INTC. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors CBRE. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CBRE or INTC?
CBRE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. CBRE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 38 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CBRE or INTC?
CBRE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CBRE or INTC?
CBRE on the Momentum factor, by 21 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CBRE or INTC?
CBRE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. CBRE on Risk Resilience, by 21 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CBRE more profitable than INTC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 17.5% vs 38.9%; operating margin 3.7% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 16% vs -10.8%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is CBRE's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
CBRE lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 19 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-07-01 and 2026-10-30. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-06, when CBRE moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the CBRE vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Value gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to CBRE's edge; INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; CBRE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about CBRE and INTC?
CBRE: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. INTC: 3 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on CBRE is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare CBRE and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.