CNX vs CVX Stock Comparison
Compare CNX and CVX across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between CNX and CVX?
CNX leads the current stock comparison as CNX Resources Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
CNX Resources Corporation vs Chevron Corporation
CNX leads
CNX leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 4 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support CNX, and its lead is narrowing.
CNX Resources Corporation
Chevron Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CNX over CVX, 57 versus 56 as of Sep 11, 2026. CNX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while CVX holds the stronger momentum profile. CNX also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CNX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. CNX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare CNX Resources Corporation and Chevron Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare CNX and CVX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum57 vs 73CVX +16
- Quality66 vs 52CNX +14
- Risk Resilience52 vs 63CVX +11
- Value52 vs 42CNX +10
3 of 6 evidence groups favor CNX. CNX’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; CVX keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -8
New signals
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No new signals fired.
CNX's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — CNX and CVX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
CNX (CNX Resources Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
CVX (Chevron Corporation): the counter-case, on momentum, risk resilience, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CNXCNX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
CVXCVX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
CNXCNX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
CVXCVX on the Momentum factor, by 16 points.
Lower downside
CVXCVX on Risk Resilience, by 11 points.
Analyst upside
CNXCNX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | CNX | CVX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +3% | +0.4% | CNX has more room |
| Target dispersion | +21.6% | +32.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 12 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CNX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 57 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | CNXon balance | revenue growth -21% vs 41.3%; EPS growth -46.7% vs 4.5%; TTM ROE 21.2% vs 11%; gross margin 49.9% vs 31%; operating margin 42.2% vs 15.8% — CNX takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | CNX | Value 52 vs 42 |
| Technicals | CVX | Price vs 50-day 2.5% vs 10.5%; vs 200-day -1% vs 16.9% |
| Risk Resilience | CVX | Risk Resilience 52 vs 63 |
| Analyst expectations | CNX | Target upside 3% vs 0.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CNX and CVX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CNX.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10CNX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- CNX +1
- 57 vs 56
- 7 sessions ago
- CNX +7
- 63 vs 56
- 30 sessions ago
- CNX +4
- 59 vs 55
- 90 sessions ago
- CNX +9
- 54 vs 45
The lead changed hands 8 times in this window, most recently on Jul 28 when CNX moved ahead of CVX.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (5.68%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
5 bullish / 0 bearish
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (6.46%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -2.07%, AIQ -2 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.61%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1CVX closes the Quality gap — currently 14 points behind, the largest single contributor to CNX's edge.
- 2CVX's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3CNX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate CNX's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
CNX leads on balance| Metric | CNX | CVX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -21% | 41.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -46.7% | 4.5% |
| Gross margin | 49.9% | 31% |
| Operating margin | 42.2% | 15.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 21.2% | 11% |
| Debt to equity | 0.49 | 0.2 |
Performance
CVX leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | CNX | CVX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.4% | 0.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.6% | 8.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 10.5% | 12.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -10% | 10.9% |
| Year to date | -0.3% | 38.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 26.4% | 38.2% |
Technicals
CVX has the stronger structure| Metric | CNX | CVX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 52.9 | 62.4 |
| ADX (14) | 22.6 | 30.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | 2.5% | 10.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -1% | 16.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 17.6% | 17.7% |
Risk
CVX is the more resilient| Metric | CNX | CVX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.08 | -0.48 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.81 | 1.31 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.36 | 1.93 |
| Max drawdown | -24.9% | -21.5% |
| Current drawdown | -13.9% | -0.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 28.8% | 23.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.9% | -2.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CNX or CVX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CNX is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 57 against CVX's 56. The edge comes from quality and value. CVX is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CNX or CVX the better buy right now?
CNX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CNX over CVX?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. CVX leads Momentum by 16 points; CNX leads Quality by 14 points; CVX leads Risk Resilience by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, CNX or CVX?
Analyst price targets imply +3% upside for CNX and +0.4% for CVX, so the Street currently favors CNX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CNX or CVX?
CNX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. CNX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CNX or CVX?
CVX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CNX or CVX?
CVX on the Momentum factor, by 16 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CNX or CVX?
CVX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. CVX on Risk Resilience, by 11 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CNX more profitable than CVX?
CNX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 49.9% vs 31%; operating margin 42.2% vs 15.8%; ttm roe 21.2% vs 11%.
Is CNX's lead over CVX getting stronger or weaker?
CNX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 8 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-28, when CNX moved ahead of CVX.
What would change the CNX vs CVX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: CVX closes the Quality gap — currently 14 points behind, the largest single contributor to CNX's edge; CVX's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; CNX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate CNX's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about CNX and CVX?
CNX: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral. CVX: 5 bullish / 0 bearish. The most decision-relevant rule on CNX is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On CVX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare CNX and CVX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.