COHR vs INTC Stock Comparison
COHR currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 34 vs 30. The clearest difference is quality, while INTC has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between COHR and INTC?
COHR leads the current stock comparison as Coherent, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Coherent, Inc. vs Intel Corp.
COHR leads
COHR leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from INTC.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support COHR, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Coherent, Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors COHR over INTC, 34 versus 30 as of Oct 21, 2026. COHR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while INTC holds the stronger momentum profile. COHR also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor COHR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. COHR lead: Reversed — INTC led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; COHR now leads by 4.
Compare Coherent, Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare COHR and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality50 vs 39COHR +11
- Momentum13 vs 21INTC +8
- Risk Resilience36 vs 29COHR +7
- Value33 vs 30Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor COHR. COHR’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; INTC keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
COHR's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — COHR and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
COHR (Coherent, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
COHRCOHR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
COHRCOHR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
INTCINTC on the Momentum factor, by 8 points.
Lower downside
COHRCOHR on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
COHRCOHR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | COHR | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +64.6% | +18.2% | COHR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +57.6% | +122.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor COHR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | COHR | 34 vs 30 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 13.3% vs 18.8%; EPS growth 21.8% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 8.4% vs -10.8%; gross margin 37.5% vs 38.9% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 33 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -19.5% vs -9.6%; vs 200-day -21.2% vs 7.8% |
| Risk Resilience | COHR | Risk Resilience 36 vs 29 |
| Analyst expectations | COHR | Target upside 64.6% vs 18.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of COHR and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on COHR.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20COHR lead: Reversed — INTC led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; COHR now leads by 4.
- Today
- COHR +4
- 34 vs 30
- 7 sessions ago
- COHR +4
- 34 vs 30
- 30 sessions ago
- INTC +1
- 42 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- COHR +9
- 51 vs 42
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Oct 1 when COHR moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Keltner Channel Breakdown, MACD Bearish Crossover.
COHR leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.47%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.39%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 11 points behind, the largest single contributor to COHR's edge.
- 2INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3COHR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | COHR | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 13.3% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 21.8% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 37.5% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 12% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 8.4% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.32 | 0.58 |
Performance
INTC leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | COHR | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -20.1% | -10.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -25.3% | -26% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -25.8% | -10.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -32.5% | 38.4% |
| Year to date | 25.6% | 148.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 105.7% | 148.9% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | COHR | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 35.1 | 16.4 |
| ADX (14) | 19 | 23.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -19.5% | -9.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -21.2% | 7.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 81.7% | 46.6% |
Risk
COHR is the more resilient| Metric | COHR | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.36 | 3.08 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.18 | 1.5 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.84 | 2.73 |
| Max drawdown | -48% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -45.7% | -34.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 87.7% | 77.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -9.6% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, COHR or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, COHR is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 34 against INTC's 30. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is COHR or INTC the better buy right now?
COHR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor COHR over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. COHR leads Quality by 11 points; INTC leads Momentum by 8 points; COHR leads Risk Resilience by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, COHR or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +64.6% upside for COHR and +18.2% for INTC, so the Street currently favors COHR. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, COHR or INTC?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, COHR or INTC?
COHR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, COHR or INTC?
INTC on the Momentum factor, by 8 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, COHR or INTC?
COHR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. COHR on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is COHR more profitable than INTC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 37.5% vs 38.9%; operating margin 12% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 8.4% vs -10.8%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is COHR's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
COHR lead: Reversed — INTC led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; COHR now leads by 4. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-01, when COHR moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the COHR vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 11 points behind, the largest single contributor to COHR's edge; INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; COHR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about COHR and INTC?
COHR: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on COHR is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare COHR and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.