CVE vs CVX Stock Comparison
Compare CVE and CVX across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between CVE and CVX?
CVE leads the current stock comparison as Cenovus Energy Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Cenovus Energy Inc. vs Chevron Corporation
CVE leads
CVE leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support CVE, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Cenovus Energy Inc.
Chevron Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CVE over CVX, 59 versus 56 as of Sep 11, 2026. CVE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while CVX holds the stronger risk resilience profile. CVE also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CVE today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. CVE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Cenovus Energy Inc. and Chevron Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare CVE and CVX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value57 vs 42CVE +15
- Risk Resilience56 vs 63CVX +7
- Momentum67 vs 73CVX +6
- Quality56 vs 52CVE +4
4 of 6 evidence groups favor CVE. CVE’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; CVX keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No new signals fired.
CVE's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — CVE and CVX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
CVE (Cenovus Energy Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
CVX (Chevron Corporation): the counter-case, on risk resilience, momentum.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CVECVE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
CVECVE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
CVECVE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points.
Momentum
CVXCVX on the Momentum factor, by 6 points.
Lower downside
CVXCVX on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
CVECVE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | CVE | CVX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +8.7% | +0.4% | CVE has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +32.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 12 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CVE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 59 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | CVEon balance | revenue growth 40.7% vs 41.3%; EPS growth 84.5% vs 4.5%; TTM ROE 21% vs 11%; gross margin 21.4% vs 31%; operating margin 19.4% vs 15.8% — CVE takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | CVE | Value 57 vs 42 |
| Technicals | CVE | Price vs 50-day 11.6% vs 10.5%; vs 200-day 34.3% vs 16.9% |
| Risk Resilience | CVX | Risk Resilience 56 vs 63 |
| Analyst expectations | CVE | Target upside 8.7% vs 0.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CVE and CVX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CVE.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10CVE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- CVE +3
- 59 vs 56
- 7 sessions ago
- CVE +2
- 58 vs 56
- 30 sessions ago
- CVE +3
- 58 vs 55
- 90 sessions ago
- CVE +3
- 48 vs 45
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (19.45%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
5 bullish / 0 bearish
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (6.46%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.69%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.61%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1CVX closes the Value gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to CVE's edge.
- 2CVX's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3CVE's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
CVE leads on balance| Metric | CVE | CVX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 40.7% | 41.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 84.5% | 4.5% |
| Gross margin | 21.4% | 31% |
| Operating margin | 19.4% | 15.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 21% | 11% |
| Debt to equity | 0.34 | 0.2 |
Performance
CVE leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | CVE | CVX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.6% | 0.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 10.5% | 8.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 17.5% | 12.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 40.7% | 10.9% |
| Year to date | 95.7% | 38.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 108.2% | 38.2% |
Technicals
CVE has the stronger structure| Metric | CVE | CVX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 56 | 62.4 |
| ADX (14) | 23.3 | 30.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | 11.6% | 10.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 34.3% | 16.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 30% | 17.7% |
Risk
CVX is the more resilient| Metric | CVE | CVX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.2 | -0.48 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.07 | 1.31 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.43 | 1.93 |
| Max drawdown | -23.4% | -21.5% |
| Current drawdown | -0.4% | -0.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 36.1% | 23.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.7% | -2.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CVE or CVX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CVE is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 59 against CVX's 56. The edge comes from value and quality. CVX is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CVE or CVX the better buy right now?
CVE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CVE over CVX?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. CVE leads Value by 15 points; CVX leads Risk Resilience by 7 points; CVX leads Momentum by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, CVE or CVX?
Analyst price targets imply +8.7% upside for CVE and +0.4% for CVX, so the Street currently favors CVE. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CVE or CVX?
CVE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. CVE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CVE or CVX?
CVE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CVE or CVX?
CVX on the Momentum factor, by 6 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CVE or CVX?
CVX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. CVX on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CVE more profitable than CVX?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 21.4% vs 31%; operating margin 19.4% vs 15.8%; ttm roe 21% vs 11%. CVE leads on two measures and CVX on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is CVE's lead over CVX getting stronger or weaker?
CVE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the CVE vs CVX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: CVX closes the Value gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to CVE's edge; CVX's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; CVE's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about CVE and CVX?
CVE: 5 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. CVX: 5 bullish / 0 bearish. The most decision-relevant rule on CVE is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On CVX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare CVE and CVX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.