DE vs INTC Stock Comparison
Compare DE and INTC across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between DE and INTC?
DE leads the current stock comparison as Deere & Company, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Deere & Company vs Intel Corp.
DE leads
DE leads by 17 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience. Wall Street currently favors INTC on target upside.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support DE.
Deere & Company
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DE over INTC, 52 versus 35 as of Sep 6, 2026. DE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while INTC holds the stronger quality profile. DE also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors INTC. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DE today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability.
Compare Deere & Company and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare DE and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum25%95 vs 40DE +55
- Risk Resilience15%44 vs 29DE +15
- Value30%38 vs 30DE +8
- Quality30%34 vs 39INTC +5
4 of 6 evidence groups favor DE. DE’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; INTC keeps a meaningful quality edge.
The central trade-off
DE (Deere & Company): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on quality, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 47.7% against 40.6%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DEDE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
DEDE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DEDE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points.
Momentum
DEDE on the Momentum factor, by 55 points.
Lower downside
DEDE on Risk Resilience, by 15 points.
Analyst upside
INTCINTC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors DE, analyst targets favor INTC. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | DE | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +3.3% | +7.4% | INTC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +33.9% | +136.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DE | 52 vs 35 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth -5.7% vs 18.8%; EPS growth -22.1% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 18.1% vs -10.8%; gross margin 35.7% vs 38.9% |
| Valuation | DE | Value 38 vs 30 |
| Technicals | DE | Price vs 50-day 12.1% vs -4.8%; vs 200-day 22.1% vs 29.2% |
| Risk Resilience | DE | Risk Resilience 44 vs 29 |
| Analyst expectations | INTC | Target upside 3.3% vs 7.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DE and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 17 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DE.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Momentum gap — currently 55 points behind, the largest single contributor to DE's edge.
- 2INTC generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3DE starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | DE | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -5.7% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -22.1% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 35.7% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 19% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 18.1% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 2.29 | 0.58 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | DE | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 10% | 7.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 11.7% | -5.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 18.9% | -3.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 17.6% | 120.6% |
| Year to date | 45% | 159.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 46.7% | 299.2% |
Technicals
DE has the stronger structure| Metric | DE | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 73.2 | 37.6 |
| ADX (14) | 24.4 | 14.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | 12.1% | -4.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 22.1% | 29.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 40.6% | 47.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DE or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DE is the stronger of the two as of Sep 6, 2026, scoring 52 against INTC's 35. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DE or INTC the better buy right now?
DE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 6, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DE over INTC?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. DE leads Momentum by 55 points; DE leads Risk Resilience by 15 points; DE leads Value by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DE or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +3.3% upside for DE and +7.4% for INTC, so the Street currently favors INTC. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors DE. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DE or INTC?
DE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DE or INTC?
DE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DE or INTC?
DE on the Momentum factor, by 55 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DE or INTC?
DE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DE on Risk Resilience, by 15 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DE more profitable than INTC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 35.7% vs 38.9%; operating margin 19% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 18.1% vs -10.8%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
What would change the DE vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Momentum gap — currently 55 points behind, the largest single contributor to DE's edge; INTC generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; DE starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
Compare DE and INTC with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.