ENPH vs INTC Stock Comparison
ENPH currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 43 vs 33. The clearest difference is quality, while INTC has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between ENPH and INTC?
ENPH leads the current stock comparison as Enphase Energy, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Enphase Energy, Inc. vs Intel Corp.
ENPH leads
ENPH leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, and the lead has widened from 6 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors INTC on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support ENPH, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Enphase Energy, Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ENPH over INTC, 43 versus 33 as of Oct 31, 2026. ENPH's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while INTC holds the stronger momentum profile. ENPH also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors INTC. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ENPH today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. ENPH lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Enphase Energy, Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare ENPH and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality56 vs 39ENPH +17
- Value46 vs 30ENPH +16
- Risk Resilience43 vs 28ENPH +15
- Momentum24 vs 34INTC +10
4 of 6 evidence groups favor ENPH. ENPH’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; INTC keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
ENPH's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ENPH and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ENPH (Enphase Energy, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ENPHENPH on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
ENPHENPH on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
ENPHENPH on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points.
Momentum
INTCINTC on the Momentum factor, by 10 points.
Lower downside
ENPHENPH on Risk Resilience, by 15 points.
Analyst upside
INTCINTC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors ENPH, analyst targets favor INTC. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | ENPH | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +71% | +76.7% | INTC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +139.1% | +107.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 14 | 25 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ENPH. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | ENPH | 43 vs 33 |
| Fundamentals | ENPHon balance | revenue growth 3.2% vs 18.8%; EPS growth 5.5% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 12.3% vs -10.8%; gross margin 46.9% vs 38.9% — ENPH takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | ENPH | Value 46 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -24.9% vs -35.3%; vs 200-day -28.7% vs 10.4% |
| Risk Resilience | ENPH | Risk Resilience 43 vs 28 |
| Analyst expectations | INTC | Target upside 71% vs 76.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ENPH and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ENPH.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28ENPH lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- ENPH +10
- 43 vs 33
- 7 sessions ago
- ENPH +15
- 46 vs 31
- 30 sessions ago
- ENPH +6
- 46 vs 40
- 90 sessions ago
- ENPH +13
- 45 vs 32
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only ENPH
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (20.15%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (17.44%)
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, MACD Bearish Crossover.
ENPH leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.81%, AIQ -1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -28.58%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to ENPH's edge.
- 2INTC's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3ENPH's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 5 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ENPH leads on balance| Metric | ENPH | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.2% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 5.5% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 46.9% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 8.3% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 12.3% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.52 | 0.58 |
Performance
INTC leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | ENPH | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -20.9% | 2.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -24.2% | -20.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -33.1% | 4.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -19.9% | 6.3% |
| Year to date | -15.1% | 158.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -24% | 149.6% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | ENPH | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 24.7 | 36.1 |
| ADX (14) | 31.9 | 25.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -24.9% | -35.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -28.7% | 10.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 73% | 52.8% |
Risk
ENPH is the more resilient| Metric | ENPH | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.52 | 3.08 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.1 | 1.41 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.18 | 2.52 |
| Max drawdown | -65.5% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -65.5% | -32.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 84.3% | 77.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.8% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ENPH or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ENPH is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 43 against INTC's 33. The edge comes from quality and value. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ENPH or INTC the better buy right now?
ENPH carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ENPH over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ENPH leads Quality by 17 points; ENPH leads Value by 16 points; ENPH leads Risk Resilience by 15 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ENPH or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +71% upside for ENPH and +76.7% for INTC, so the Street currently favors INTC. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors ENPH. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ENPH or INTC?
ENPH is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. ENPH on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ENPH or INTC?
ENPH on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ENPH or INTC?
INTC on the Momentum factor, by 10 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ENPH or INTC?
ENPH is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ENPH on Risk Resilience, by 15 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ENPH more profitable than INTC?
ENPH leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 46.9% vs 38.9%; operating margin 8.3% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 12.3% vs -10.8%.
Is ENPH's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
ENPH lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 10 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the ENPH vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to ENPH's edge; INTC's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; ENPH's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 5 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about ENPH and INTC?
ENPH: 2 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ENPH is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare ENPH and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.