EXK vs INTC Stock Comparison
EXK currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 36 vs 33. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between EXK and INTC?
EXK leads the current stock comparison as Endeavour Silver Corp., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Endeavour Silver Corp. vs Intel Corp.
EXK leads
EXK leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from INTC.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support EXK, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Endeavour Silver Corp.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors EXK over INTC, 36 versus 33 as of Oct 31, 2026. EXK's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. EXK also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor EXK today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. EXK lead: Reversed — INTC led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; EXK now leads by 3.
Compare Endeavour Silver Corp. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare EXK and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality48 vs 39EXK +9
- Risk Resilience32 vs 28EXK +4
- Value27 vs 30Even
- Momentum33 vs 34Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor EXK. EXK’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
EXK's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — EXK and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
EXK (Endeavour Silver Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
EXKEXK on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EXKEXK on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
EXKEXK on Risk Resilience, by 4 points.
Analyst upside
EXKEXK on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | EXK | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +135.8% | +76.7% | EXK has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +107.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 25 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor EXK. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 36 vs 33 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 2.1% vs 18.8%; EPS growth -4.3% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 10.5% vs -10.8%; gross margin 28.3% vs 38.9% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 27 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -23.8% vs -35.3%; vs 200-day -18.6% vs 10.4% |
| Risk Resilience | EXK | Risk Resilience 32 vs 28 |
| Analyst expectations | EXK | Target upside 135.8% vs 76.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of EXK and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on EXK.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28EXK lead: Reversed — INTC led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; EXK now leads by 3.
- Today
- EXK +3
- 36 vs 33
- 7 sessions ago
- EXK +3
- 34 vs 31
- 30 sessions ago
- INTC +6
- 34 vs 40
- 90 sessions ago
- EXK +14
- 46 vs 32
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Sep 9 when INTC moved ahead of EXK.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only EXK
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.47%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (17.44%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode.
EXK leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -7.09%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -28.58%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 9 points behind, the largest single contributor to EXK's edge.
- 2INTC's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3EXK's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | EXK | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.1% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -4.3% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 28.3% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 25.7% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.5% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.35 | 0.58 |
Performance
INTC leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | EXK | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.1% | 2.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -7.1% | -20.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 2.6% | 4.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -10.4% | 6.3% |
| Year to date | -15.2% | 158.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -1.5% | 149.6% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | EXK | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 39.8 | 36.1 |
| ADX (14) | 23.7 | 25.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -23.8% | -35.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -18.6% | 10.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 50.6% | 52.8% |
Risk
EXK is the more resilient| Metric | EXK | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.16 | 3.08 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.31 | 1.41 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.5 | 2.52 |
| Max drawdown | -47.5% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -43.6% | -32.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 76% | 77.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -7.4% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, EXK or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, EXK is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 36 against INTC's 33. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is EXK or INTC the better buy right now?
EXK carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor EXK over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. EXK leads Quality by 9 points; EXK leads Risk Resilience by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, EXK or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +135.8% upside for EXK and +76.7% for INTC, so the Street currently favors EXK. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, EXK or INTC?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, EXK or INTC?
EXK on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, EXK or INTC?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, EXK or INTC?
EXK is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. EXK on Risk Resilience, by 4 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is EXK more profitable than INTC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 28.3% vs 38.9%; operating margin 25.7% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 10.5% vs -10.8%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is EXK's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
EXK lead: Reversed — INTC led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; EXK now leads by 3. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-09, when INTC moved ahead of EXK.
What would change the EXK vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 9 points behind, the largest single contributor to EXK's edge; INTC's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; EXK's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about EXK and INTC?
EXK: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on EXK is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare EXK and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.