FENI vs VLO Stock Comparison
FENI currently leads VLO in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 58 vs 54. The clearest difference is risk resilience, while VLO has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between FENI and VLO?
FENI leads the current stock comparison as Fidelity Enhanced International ETF, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF vs Valero Energy Corporation
FENI leads
FENI leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality.
Competitive: 2 of 3 evidence groups support FENI, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
Valero Energy Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors FENI over VLO, 58 versus 54 as of Oct 24, 2026. FENI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while VLO holds the stronger momentum profile. FENI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 3 covered evidence groups favor FENI today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. FENI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Fidelity Enhanced International ETF and Valero Energy Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare FENI and VLO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience83 vs 49FENI +34
- Momentum31 vs 49VLO +18
- Quality68 vs 58FENI +10
2 of 3 evidence groups favor FENI. FENI’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; VLO keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-23, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-22.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -11
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
FENI's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — FENI and VLO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
FENI (Fidelity Enhanced International ETF): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
VLO (Valero Energy Corporation): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 39% against 10.5%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
FENIFENI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
VLOVLO on the Momentum factor, by 18 points.
Lower downside
FENIFENI on Risk Resilience, by 34 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | FENI | VLO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | -11.8% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +68.4% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | — | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | — | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 3 covered evidence groups favor FENI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | FENI | 58 vs 54 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | Not covered | Not covered |
| Technicals | VLO | Price vs 50-day -3.2% vs 6.8%; vs 200-day -0.5% vs 49.5% |
| Risk Resilience | FENI | Risk Resilience 83 vs 49 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of FENI and VLO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on FENI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 24 – Oct 23FENI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- FENI +4
- 58 vs 54
- 7 sessions ago
- VLO +4
- 60 vs 64
- 30 sessions ago
- FENI +2
- 61 vs 59
- 90 sessions ago
- FENI +6
- 66 vs 60
The lead changed hands 12 times in this window, most recently on Oct 20 when FENI moved ahead of VLO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral
Only FENI
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (1.04%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only VLO
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.02%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active.
VLO is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.48%, AIQ -1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.64%, AIQ -3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1VLO closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to FENI's edge.
- 2VLO generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3FENI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | FENI | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | 13.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | — | 199.1% |
| Gross margin | — | 11.3% |
| Operating margin | — | 7.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | — | 29.9% |
| Debt to equity | — | 0.45 |
Performance
VLO leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | FENI | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.1% | -5.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3% | 8.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -1.8% | 37.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 0.7% | 77.8% |
| Year to date | 7.4% | 157.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 10.8% | 165.9% |
Technicals
VLO has the stronger structure| Metric | FENI | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 37.7 | 50 |
| ADX (14) | 17.6 | 26.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -3.2% | 6.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -0.5% | 49.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 10.5% | 39% |
Risk
FENI is the more resilient| Metric | FENI | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.03 | -0.37 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.48 | 2.63 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.75 | 4.44 |
| Max drawdown | -12.1% | -12.7% |
| Current drawdown | -6.4% | -8.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 16.6% | 37.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.6% | -3.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, FENI or VLO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, FENI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 24, 2026, scoring 58 against VLO's 54. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. VLO is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is FENI or VLO the better buy right now?
FENI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 24, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 2 of 3 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor FENI over VLO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. FENI leads Risk Resilience by 34 points; VLO leads Momentum by 18 points; FENI leads Quality by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, FENI or VLO?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for FENI and -11.8% for VLO. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, FENI or VLO?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, FENI or VLO?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, FENI or VLO?
VLO on the Momentum factor, by 18 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, FENI or VLO?
FENI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. FENI on Risk Resilience, by 34 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is FENI more profitable than VLO?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is FENI's lead over VLO getting stronger or weaker?
FENI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-24 and 2026-10-23. The lead has changed hands 12 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-20, when FENI moved ahead of VLO.
What would change the FENI vs VLO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: VLO closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to FENI's edge; VLO generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover; FENI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about FENI and VLO?
FENI: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral. VLO: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on FENI is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On VLO it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.