FMC vs GE Stock Comparison
Compare FMC and GE across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between FMC and GE?
FMC leads the current stock comparison as FMC Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
FMC Corporation vs GE Aerospace
FMC leads
FMC leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from GE.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support FMC, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
FMC Corporation
GE Aerospace
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors FMC over GE, 49 versus 44 as of Sep 11, 2026. FMC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while GE holds the stronger quality profile. FMC also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FMC today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. FMC lead: Reversed — GE led by 8 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; FMC now leads by 5.
Compare FMC Corporation and GE Aerospace across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare FMC and GE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality16 vs 70GE +54
- Value75 vs 26FMC +49
- Momentum66 vs 29FMC +37
- Risk Resilience35 vs 54GE +19
3 of 6 evidence groups favor FMC. FMC’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; GE keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No new signals fired.
FMC's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — FMC and GE both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
FMC (FMC Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
GE (GE Aerospace): the counter-case, on quality, risk resilience.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
FMCFMC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
FMCFMC on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
FMCFMC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 49 points.
Momentum
FMCFMC on the Momentum factor, by 37 points.
Lower downside
GEGE on Risk Resilience, by 19 points.
Analyst upside
FMCFMC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | FMC | GE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +31.6% | +26% | FMC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +66.7% | +24.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FMC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | FMC | 49 vs 44 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 14.3% vs 7.7%; EPS growth 34.2% vs 25.3%; TTM ROE -118.6% vs 49%; gross margin 35.3% vs 35.4%; operating margin -71.6% vs 20.8% |
| Valuation | FMC | Value 75 vs 26 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day 2.2% vs -8.7%; vs 200-day -10.5% vs 0.7% |
| Risk Resilience | GE | Risk Resilience 35 vs 54 |
| Analyst expectations | FMC | Target upside 31.6% vs 26% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of FMC and GE and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on FMC.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10FMC lead: Reversed — GE led by 8 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; FMC now leads by 5.
- Today
- FMC +5
- 49 vs 44
- 7 sessions ago
- FMC +7
- 51 vs 44
- 30 sessions ago
- GE +8
- 40 vs 48
- 90 sessions ago
- GE +14
- 43 vs 57
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Aug 21 when FMC moved ahead of GE.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (21.01%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.20%)
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (10.18%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
FMC leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -5.63%, AIQ -1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.15%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1GE closes the Value gap — currently 49 points behind, the largest single contributor to FMC's edge.
- 2GE's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3FMC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | FMC | GE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 14.3% | 7.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 34.2% | 25.3% |
| Gross margin | 35.3% | 35.4% |
| Operating margin | -71.6% | 20.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -118.6% | 49% |
| Debt to equity | 2.62 | 1.09 |
Performance
GE leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | FMC | GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -9.4% | -1.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 18% | -11.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 11.9% | 1.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -15.2% | -0.3% |
| Year to date | -12.9% | 5.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -68.1% | 17.4% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | FMC | GE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 62.1 | 35 |
| ADX (14) | 27.1 | 23.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | 2.2% | -8.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | -10.5% | 0.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 61.3% | 32.1% |
Risk
GE is the more resilient| Metric | FMC | GE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.54 | 1.24 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.1 | 0.53 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.14 | 0.78 |
| Max drawdown | -73.9% | -21% |
| Current drawdown | -68.5% | -15% |
| Annualized volatility | 74.8% | 33% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6% | -3.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, FMC or GE?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, FMC is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 49 against GE's 44. The edge comes from value and momentum. GE is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is FMC or GE the better buy right now?
FMC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor FMC over GE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. GE leads Quality by 54 points; FMC leads Value by 49 points; FMC leads Momentum by 37 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, FMC or GE?
Analyst price targets imply +31.6% upside for FMC and +26% for GE, so the Street currently favors FMC. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, FMC or GE?
FMC is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. FMC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 49 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, FMC or GE?
FMC on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, FMC or GE?
FMC on the Momentum factor, by 37 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, FMC or GE?
GE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. GE on Risk Resilience, by 19 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is FMC more profitable than GE?
GE leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 35.3% vs 35.4%; operating margin -71.6% vs 20.8%; ttm roe -118.6% vs 49%.
Is FMC's lead over GE getting stronger or weaker?
FMC lead: Reversed — GE led by 8 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; FMC now leads by 5. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-21, when FMC moved ahead of GE.
What would change the FMC vs GE verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: GE closes the Value gap — currently 49 points behind, the largest single contributor to FMC's edge; GE's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; FMC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about FMC and GE?
FMC: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. GE: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on FMC is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On GE it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare FMC and GE with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.