FORM vs INTC Stock Comparison
FORM currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 38 vs 30. The clearest difference is risk resilience, while INTC has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between FORM and INTC?
FORM leads the current stock comparison as FormFactor, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
FormFactor, Inc. vs Intel Corp.
FORM leads
FORM leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 15 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support FORM, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
FormFactor, Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors FORM over INTC, 38 versus 30 as of Oct 21, 2026. FORM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while INTC holds the stronger momentum profile. FORM also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FORM today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. FORM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 15 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare FormFactor, Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare FORM and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience54 vs 29FORM +25
- Quality61 vs 39FORM +22
- Momentum10 vs 21INTC +11
- Value31 vs 30Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor FORM. FORM’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; INTC keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
New signals
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
FORM's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — FORM and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
FORM (FormFactor, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
FORMFORM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
FORMFORM on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
INTCINTC on the Momentum factor, by 11 points.
Lower downside
FORMFORM on Risk Resilience, by 25 points.
Analyst upside
FORMFORM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | FORM | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +36% | +18.2% | FORM has more room |
| Target dispersion | +55.7% | +122.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FORM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | FORM | 38 vs 30 |
| Fundamentals | FORMon balance | revenue growth 14.2% vs 18.8%; EPS growth 176.9% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 11% vs -10.8%; gross margin 45.6% vs 38.9% — FORM takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 31 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -6.7% vs -9.6%; vs 200-day -4.5% vs 7.8% |
| Risk Resilience | FORM | Risk Resilience 54 vs 29 |
| Analyst expectations | FORM | Target upside 36% vs 18.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of FORM and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on FORM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20FORM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 15 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- FORM +8
- 38 vs 30
- 7 sessions ago
- FORM +12
- 42 vs 30
- 30 sessions ago
- FORM +15
- 58 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- FORM +16
- 58 vs 42
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
FORM and INTC carry the same 5 signals, so the signals do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Keltner Channel Breakdown, RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce, MACD Bearish Crossover.
FORM leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.16%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.39%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to FORM's edge.
- 2INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3FORM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 8-point move would eliminate FORM's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
FORM leads on balance| Metric | FORM | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 14.2% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 176.9% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 45.6% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 16.9% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 11% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.03 | 0.58 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | FORM | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -15.9% | -10.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -14.5% | -26% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -5% | -10.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -23.5% | 38.4% |
| Year to date | 93.1% | 148.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 157.6% | 148.9% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | FORM | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 20.5 | 16.4 |
| ADX (14) | 23.5 | 23.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6.7% | -9.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -4.5% | 7.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 68.3% | 46.6% |
Risk
FORM is the more resilient| Metric | FORM | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.89 | 3.08 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.47 | 1.5 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.41 | 2.73 |
| Max drawdown | -47.8% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -32.7% | -34.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 86.4% | 77.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -7.8% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, FORM or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, FORM is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 38 against INTC's 30. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is FORM or INTC the better buy right now?
FORM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor FORM over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. FORM leads Risk Resilience by 25 points; FORM leads Quality by 22 points; INTC leads Momentum by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, FORM or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +36% upside for FORM and +18.2% for INTC, so the Street currently favors FORM. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, FORM or INTC?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, FORM or INTC?
FORM on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, FORM or INTC?
INTC on the Momentum factor, by 11 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, FORM or INTC?
FORM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. FORM on Risk Resilience, by 25 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is FORM more profitable than INTC?
FORM leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 45.6% vs 38.9%; operating margin 16.9% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 11% vs -10.8%.
Is FORM's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
FORM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 15 to 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the FORM vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to FORM's edge; INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; FORM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 8-point move would eliminate FORM's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about FORM and INTC?
FORM: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on FORM is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare FORM and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.