FSK vs INTC Stock Comparison
FSK currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 45 vs 31. The clearest difference is risk resilience.
What is the main difference between FSK and INTC?
FSK leads the current stock comparison as FS KKR Capital Corp., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
FS KKR Capital Corp. vs Intel Corp.
FSK leads
FSK leads by 14 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Value, having only recently taken the lead back from INTC. Wall Street currently favors INTC on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support FSK, and the lead recently changed hands.
FS KKR Capital Corp.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors FSK over INTC, 45 versus 31 as of Oct 24, 2026. FSK's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and value. FSK also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors INTC. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FSK today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. FSK lead: Reversed — INTC led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; FSK now leads by 14.
Compare FS KKR Capital Corp. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare FSK and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience57 vs 28FSK +29
- Value57 vs 30FSK +27
- Momentum31 vs 23FSK +8
- Quality39 vs 39Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor FSK. FSK’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-23, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-22.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
New signals
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.01%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
FSK's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — FSK and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
FSK (FS KKR Capital Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and value.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on technicals, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 50.4% against 26.4%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
FSKFSK on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
FSKFSK on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
FSKFSK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points.
Momentum
FSKFSK on the Momentum factor, by 8 points.
Lower downside
FSKFSK on Risk Resilience, by 29 points.
Analyst upside
INTCINTC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors FSK, analyst targets favor INTC. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | FSK | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +11.1% | +34.4% | INTC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +25.9% | +115.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 23 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FSK. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | FSK | 45 vs 31 |
| Fundamentals | FSK | revenue growth 176.2% vs 18.8%; EPS growth 91.7% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE -6.7% vs -10.8%; gross margin 60.5% vs 38.9%; operating margin -0.3% vs 0.1% |
| Valuation | FSK | Value 57 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -8.7% vs -14.8%; vs 200-day -8.7% vs 1.9% |
| Risk Resilience | FSK | Risk Resilience 57 vs 28 |
| Analyst expectations | INTC | Target upside 11.1% vs 34.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of FSK and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 14 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on FSK.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 24 – Oct 23FSK lead: Reversed — INTC led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; FSK now leads by 14.
- Today
- FSK +14
- 45 vs 31
- 7 sessions ago
- FSK +15
- 45 vs 30
- 30 sessions ago
- INTC +1
- 44 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- FSK +18
- 55 vs 37
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Sep 30 when INTC moved ahead of FSK.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral
Only FSK
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.01%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (18.99%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.46%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bearish Crossover.
INTC is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.85%, AIQ -1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.72%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to FSK's edge.
- 2INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3FSK starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
FSK leads on balance| Metric | FSK | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 176.2% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 91.7% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 60.5% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | -0.3% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -6.7% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 1.23 | 0.58 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | FSK | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.1% | -3.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -7.2% | -29.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.8% | -5.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -0.8% | 23.8% |
| Year to date | -29.5% | 135.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -30.9% | 128.1% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | FSK | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 37 | 16.2 |
| ADX (14) | 31.8 | 26.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -8.7% | -14.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -8.7% | 1.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 26.4% | 50.4% |
Risk
FSK is the more resilient| Metric | FSK | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.83 | 3.1 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.07 | 1.43 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.4 | 2.58 |
| Max drawdown | -38.6% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -35.3% | -38.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 33% | 78.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.9% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, FSK or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, FSK is the stronger of the two as of Oct 24, 2026, scoring 45 against INTC's 31. The edge comes from risk resilience and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is FSK or INTC the better buy right now?
FSK carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 24, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor FSK over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. FSK leads Risk Resilience by 29 points; FSK leads Value by 27 points; FSK leads Momentum by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, FSK or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +11.1% upside for FSK and +34.4% for INTC, so the Street currently favors INTC. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors FSK. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, FSK or INTC?
FSK is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. FSK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, FSK or INTC?
FSK on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, FSK or INTC?
FSK on the Momentum factor, by 8 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, FSK or INTC?
FSK is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. FSK on Risk Resilience, by 29 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is FSK more profitable than INTC?
FSK leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 60.5% vs 38.9%; operating margin -0.3% vs 0.1%; ttm roe -6.7% vs -10.8%.
Is FSK's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
FSK lead: Reversed — INTC led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; FSK now leads by 14. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-24 and 2026-10-23. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-30, when INTC moved ahead of FSK.
What would change the FSK vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to FSK's edge; INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; FSK starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about FSK and INTC?
FSK: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral. INTC: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on FSK is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare FSK and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.