INTC vs GE Stock Comparison
Intel Corp. vs GE Aerospace
GE leads
GE leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 17 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support GE, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Intel Corp.
GE Aerospace
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors GE over INTC, 43 versus 33 as of Sep 5, 2026. GE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while INTC holds the stronger momentum profile. GE also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor GE today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. GE lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Intel Corp. and GE Aerospace across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare INTC and GE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality30%39 vs 70GE +31
- Risk Resilience15%30 vs 55GE +25
- Momentum25%33 vs 22INTC +11
- Value30%30 vs 26INTC +4
3 of 6 evidence groups favor GE. GE’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; INTC keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-03, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-02.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No new signals fired.
GE's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INTC and GE both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
GE (GE Aerospace): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, value, valuation — but at materially higher volatility, 45.1% against 30.8%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
GEGE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
GEGE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
INTCINTC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
INTCINTC on the Momentum factor, by 11 points.
Lower downside
GEGE on Risk Resilience, by 25 points.
Analyst upside
GEGE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | INTC | GE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +7.6% | +21% | GE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +135.8% | +24.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 27 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor GE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | GE | 33 vs 43 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 18.8% vs 7.7%; EPS growth -195.9% vs 25.3%; TTM ROE -10.8% vs 49%; gross margin 38.9% vs 35.4% |
| Valuation | INTC | Value 30 vs 26 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -5.5% vs -5.8%; vs 200-day 24.1% vs 3.8% |
| Risk Resilience | GE | Risk Resilience 30 vs 55 |
| Analyst expectations | GE | Target upside 7.6% vs 21% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INTC and GE and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on GE.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 22 – Sep 3GE lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- GE +10
- 33 vs 43
- 7 sessions ago
- GE +10
- 34 vs 44
- 30 sessions ago
- GE +17
- 38 vs 55
- 90 sessions ago
- GE +13
- 45 vs 58
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on May 6 when GE moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (37.24%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.65%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (11.45%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
GE leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.51%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.09%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 31 points behind, the largest single contributor to GE's edge.
- 2INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3GE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 10-point move would eliminate GE's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | INTC | GE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.8% | 7.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -195.9% | 25.3% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% | 35.4% |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | 20.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.8% | 49% |
| Debt to equity | 0.58 | 1.09 |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | INTC | GE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 30.6 | 30.4 |
| ADX (14) | 15.1 | 22.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.5% | -5.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 24.1% | 3.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 45.1% | 30.8% |
Risk
GE is the more resilient| Metric | INTC | GE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.93 | 1.25 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.04 | 0.62 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.79 | 0.91 |
| Max drawdown | -41.9% | -21% |
| Current drawdown | -35% | -12.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 79.1% | 33% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -3.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INTC or GE?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, GE is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 43 against INTC's 33. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INTC or GE the better buy right now?
GE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor GE over INTC?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. GE leads Quality by 31 points; GE leads Risk Resilience by 25 points; INTC leads Momentum by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INTC or GE?
Analyst price targets imply +7.6% upside for INTC and +21% for GE, so the Street currently favors GE. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INTC or GE?
INTC is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. INTC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INTC or GE?
GE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INTC or GE?
INTC on the Momentum factor, by 11 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INTC or GE?
GE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. GE on Risk Resilience, by 25 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INTC more profitable than GE?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 38.9% vs 35.4%; operating margin 0.1% vs 20.8%; ttm roe -10.8% vs 49%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is GE's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
GE lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 10 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-22 and 2026-09-03. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-05-06, when GE moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the INTC vs GE verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 31 points behind, the largest single contributor to GE's edge; INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; GE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 10-point move would eliminate GE's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about INTC and GE?
INTC: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. GE: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on INTC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On GE it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare INTC and GE with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.