GLXY vs MSTR Stock Comparison
Compare GLXY and MSTR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between GLXY and MSTR?
MSTR leads the current stock comparison as Strategy Inc, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Galaxy Digital vs Strategy Inc
MSTR leads
MSTR leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 13 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support MSTR, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Galaxy Digital
Strategy Inc
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors MSTR over GLXY, 49 versus 39 as of Sep 11, 2026. MSTR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while GLXY holds the stronger value profile. MSTR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MSTR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. MSTR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Galaxy Digital and Strategy Inc across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare GLXY and MSTR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality4 vs 58MSTR +54
- Value65 vs 34GLXY +31
- Risk Resilience26 vs 37MSTR +11
- Momentum57 vs 64MSTR +7
4 of 6 evidence groups favor MSTR. MSTR’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; GLXY keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -14
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -8
No new signals fired.
MSTR's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — GLXY and MSTR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
MSTR (Strategy Inc): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
GLXY (Galaxy Digital): the counter-case, on value, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
MSTRMSTR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
GLXYGLXY on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
GLXYGLXY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 31 points.
Momentum
MSTRMSTR on the Momentum factor, by 7 points.
Lower downside
MSTRMSTR on Risk Resilience, by 11 points.
Analyst upside
MSTRMSTR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | GLXY | MSTR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +53.2% | +63.3% | MSTR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +48.2% | +105.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 10 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MSTR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | MSTR | 39 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth -14.7% vs -1.6%; EPS growth 81% vs 37.1%; TTM ROE -5.4% vs -60.8%; gross margin 2.1% vs 67.6% |
| Valuation | GLXY | Value 65 vs 34 |
| Technicals | MSTR | Price vs 50-day 5.5% vs 23.3%; vs 200-day -3.8% vs -7% |
| Risk Resilience | MSTR | Risk Resilience 26 vs 37 |
| Analyst expectations | MSTR | Target upside 53.2% vs 63.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of GLXY and MSTR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on MSTR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10MSTR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- MSTR +10
- 39 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- MSTR +12
- 43 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- MSTR +13
- 36 vs 49
- 90 sessions ago
- MSTR +10
- 30 vs 40
The lead changed hands 8 times in this window, most recently on Jun 29 when MSTR moved ahead of GLXY.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (8.42%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (7.44%)
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (30.13%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.56%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
MSTR leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 3 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.12%, AIQ -3 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.87%, AIQ -2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1GLXY closes the Quality gap — currently 54 points behind, the largest single contributor to MSTR's edge.
- 2GLXY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3MSTR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 10-point move would eliminate MSTR's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | GLXY | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -14.7% | -1.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 81% | 37.1% |
| Gross margin | 2.1% | 67.6% |
| Operating margin | 0.8% | -16.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -5.4% | -60.8% |
| Debt to equity | 1.79 | 0.15 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | GLXY | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.3% | 4.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 14.5% | 35.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -20% | 11.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 12.4% | -7.1% |
| Year to date | 7.9% | -15.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -0.4% | -61% |
Technicals
MSTR has the stronger structure| Metric | GLXY | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 52.2 | 58.5 |
| ADX (14) | 19.5 | 39.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | 5.5% | 23.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -3.8% | -7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 85.3% | 108.9% |
Risk
MSTR is the more resilient| Metric | GLXY | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.84 | 3.06 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.31 | -0.84 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.52 | -1.62 |
| Max drawdown | -60.7% | -77.1% |
| Current drawdown | -43.7% | -64.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 92.7% | 79.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -8.3% | -7.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, GLXY or MSTR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, MSTR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 49 against GLXY's 39. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. GLXY is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is GLXY or MSTR the better buy right now?
MSTR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor MSTR over GLXY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. MSTR leads Quality by 54 points; GLXY leads Value by 31 points; MSTR leads Risk Resilience by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, GLXY or MSTR?
Analyst price targets imply +53.2% upside for GLXY and +63.3% for MSTR, so the Street currently favors MSTR. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, GLXY or MSTR?
GLXY is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. GLXY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 31 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, GLXY or MSTR?
GLXY on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, GLXY or MSTR?
MSTR on the Momentum factor, by 7 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, GLXY or MSTR?
MSTR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. MSTR on Risk Resilience, by 11 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is GLXY more profitable than MSTR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 2.1% vs 67.6%; operating margin 0.8% vs -16.8%; ttm roe -5.4% vs -60.8%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is MSTR's lead over GLXY getting stronger or weaker?
MSTR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 10 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 8 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-29, when MSTR moved ahead of GLXY.
What would change the GLXY vs MSTR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: GLXY closes the Quality gap — currently 54 points behind, the largest single contributor to MSTR's edge; GLXY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; MSTR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 10-point move would eliminate MSTR's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about GLXY and MSTR?
GLXY: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. MSTR: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on GLXY is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On MSTR it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare GLXY and MSTR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.