GOLD vs INTC Stock Comparison
GOLD currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 43 vs 30. The clearest difference is value, while INTC has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between GOLD and INTC?
GOLD leads the current stock comparison as Gold.com, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Gold.com, Inc. vs Intel Corp.
GOLD leads
GOLD leads by 13 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from INTC.
Fragile: 5 of 6 evidence groups support GOLD, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Gold.com, Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors GOLD over INTC, 43 versus 30 as of Oct 21, 2026. GOLD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while INTC holds the stronger quality profile. GOLD also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor GOLD today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. GOLD lead: Reversed — INTC led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; GOLD now leads by 13.
Compare Gold.com, Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare GOLD and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value68 vs 30GOLD +38
- Risk Resilience51 vs 29GOLD +22
- Quality29 vs 39INTC +10
- Momentum24 vs 21Even
5 of 6 evidence groups favor GOLD. GOLD’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; INTC keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
GOLD's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — GOLD and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
GOLD (Gold.com, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on quality, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 46.6% against 27.8%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
GOLDGOLD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
GOLDGOLD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
GOLDGOLD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 38 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
GOLDGOLD on Risk Resilience, by 22 points.
Analyst upside
GOLDGOLD on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | GOLD | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +55.6% | +18.2% | GOLD has more room |
| Target dispersion | +29.8% | +122.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor GOLD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | GOLD | 43 vs 30 |
| Fundamentals | GOLDon balance | revenue growth 59.8% vs 18.8%; EPS growth 3.9% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 11.5% vs -10.8%; operating margin -0.5% vs 0.1% — GOLD takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | GOLD | Value 68 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -11.3% vs -9.6%; vs 200-day -14.7% vs 7.8% |
| Risk Resilience | GOLD | Risk Resilience 51 vs 29 |
| Analyst expectations | GOLD | Target upside 55.6% vs 18.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of GOLD and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 13 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on GOLD.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20GOLD lead: Reversed — INTC led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; GOLD now leads by 13.
- Today
- GOLD +13
- 43 vs 30
- 7 sessions ago
- GOLD +13
- 43 vs 30
- 30 sessions ago
- INTC +2
- 41 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- GOLD +14
- 56 vs 42
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Sep 23 when INTC moved ahead of GOLD.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only GOLD
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.31%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (20.88%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce, MACD Bearish Crossover.
GOLD leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.65%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.39%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Value gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to GOLD's edge.
- 2INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3GOLD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
GOLD leads on balance| Metric | GOLD | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 59.8% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 3.9% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 0.7% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | -0.5% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 11.5% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.84 | 0.58 |
Performance
GOLD leads 3 of 5 windows| Metric | GOLD | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5% | -10.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -14.5% | -26% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -5% | -10.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -16.6% | 38.4% |
| Year to date | 12.2% | 148.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | — | 148.9% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | GOLD | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 27 | 16.4 |
| ADX (14) | 28.3 | 23.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -11.3% | -9.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -14.7% | 7.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 27.8% | 46.6% |
Risk
GOLD is the more resilient| Metric | GOLD | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.61 | 3.08 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.71 | 1.5 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.36 | 2.73 |
| Max drawdown | -41.4% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -40.5% | -34.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 54.7% | 77.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.5% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, GOLD or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, GOLD is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 43 against INTC's 30. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is GOLD or INTC the better buy right now?
GOLD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor GOLD over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. GOLD leads Value by 38 points; GOLD leads Risk Resilience by 22 points; INTC leads Quality by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, GOLD or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +55.6% upside for GOLD and +18.2% for INTC, so the Street currently favors GOLD. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, GOLD or INTC?
GOLD is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. GOLD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 38 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, GOLD or INTC?
GOLD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, GOLD or INTC?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, GOLD or INTC?
GOLD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. GOLD on Risk Resilience, by 22 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is GOLD more profitable than INTC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 0.7% vs 38.9%; operating margin -0.5% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 11.5% vs -10.8%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is GOLD's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
GOLD lead: Reversed — INTC led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; GOLD now leads by 13. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-09-23, when INTC moved ahead of GOLD.
What would change the GOLD vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Value gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to GOLD's edge; INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; GOLD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about GOLD and INTC?
GOLD: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on GOLD is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare GOLD and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.