GPIX vs JEPQ: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk

GPIX and JEPQ are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. GPIX is Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF, while JEPQ is JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF. GPIX is broader by holdings count, with 496 positions versus 110 for JEPQ. JEPQ is more concentrated at the top, based on top-10 holdings weight. Current AlgovestIQ evidence has GPIX ahead on AIQ Score, 62 versus 54.

Market data as of Oct 21, 2026 market close· Fund characteristics as of Oct 21, 2026
GPIX
Goldman
vs
JEPQ
J.P. Morgan
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
Issuer
Goldman
Inception
2023-10-24
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
Issuer
J.P. Morgan
Inception
2022-05-03

What is the main difference between GPIX and JEPQ?

GPIX holds 496 positions to JEPQ's 110, and 47% of their weight is in the same securities.

Expense ratio
GPIX
0.35%
JEPQ
0.35%
Lower annual fund cost
Holdings
GPIX
496
JEPQ
110
Broader reported basketGPIX
1Y return
GPIX
+8.5%
JEPQ
+4.1%
Trailing performanceGPIX
Annualized volatility
GPIX
11.2%
JEPQ
15.1%
Lower realized volatilityGPIX
MetricGPIXJEPQ
Fund
Expense ratio0.35%0.35%
Holdings496110
Top-10 concentration38.8%42.6%
Distribution yieldTrailing 12 months8.2%11.58%
Average volume1,096,7266,194,078
Performance
1Y return+8.5%+4.1%
YTD return+6%+2.3%
Risk
Annualized volatility11.2%15.1%
Max drawdown (1Y)-8.9%-10.3%
Beta0.861.04
Sharpe ratio0.390.04
Sortino ratio0.600.05
AlgovestIQ
AIQ Score62/10054/100
AIQ Edge Score8/105/10
Momentum50/10031/100
Risk Resilience84/10080/100

AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison

Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF vs JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF

Data as of Oct 21, 2026· market close· Options Income / Covered Call· Coverage 63/66 fields· High confidence
AIQ VerdictCompetitiveAIQ Comparison Conviction 7/10

GPIX leads

GPIX leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the lead has widened from 3 points over 30 sessions.

Competitive: 3 of 3 evidence groups support GPIX, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.

Evidence agreement: 3 of 3Comparison trend: Strengthening
GPIX

Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF

Leads
AIQ Score
62/100
AIQ Edge Score
8/10
JEPQ

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF

AIQ Score
54/100
AIQ Edge Score
5/10

The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors GPIX over JEPQ, 62 versus 54 as of Oct 21, 2026. GPIX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while JEPQ holds the stronger quality profile. GPIX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 3 covered evidence groups favor GPIX today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. GPIX lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 8 points over 30 sessions.

Compare Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.

GPIX vs JEPQ: which fits what

Each row is settled by a single measure. Where the gap is too small to matter it reads Similar, and no row decides the comparison as a whole.

If you wantGPIXJEPQFits
Lower costExpense ratio0.35%0.35%Similar
Broader diversificationNumber of holdings496110GPIX
Lower concentrationWeight of the 10 largest holdings38.8%42.6%GPIX
Higher incomeTrailing 12-month distribution yield8.2%11.58%JEPQ
Smaller drawdownsMax drawdown, 1 year-8.9%-10.3%Similar
Lower volatilityAnnualized volatility, 1 year11.2%15.1%GPIX

Similar means the gap is within 0.01 percentage points of expense ratio, 25% more holdings, 3 points of top-10 weight, 0.2 points of yield, 2 points of drawdown or 1 point of volatility. Past drawdowns and volatility describe the funds’ history, not their future.

Currently unavailable

Performance over time

Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes for both ETFs.

GPIX
+82.7%
JEPQ
+82.7%

Total return comparison

Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested

GPIX $18,274 · JEPQ $18,267

Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.

Compare GPIX and JEPQ against another ticker

Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.

Basic: 2 symbols·Explorer: 3 symbols·Pro and Premium: 5 symbols·Your limit: 2

AIQ Factor Divergence

Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.

GPIX advantage
0
JEPQ advantage
  • Momentum50 vs 31
    GPIX +19
  • Quality62 vs 69
    JEPQ +7
  • Risk Resilience84 vs 80
    GPIX +4

3 of 3 evidence groups favor GPIX. GPIX’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; JEPQ keeps a meaningful quality edge.

What changed since the last close

Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.

GPIX0 AIQ

Largest factor move: Momentum +3, not enough on its own to move the overall score.

No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.

JEPQ-1 AIQ

Largest factor move: Value -1

New signals

  • RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon

GPIX's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.

Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — GPIX and JEPQ both carry a full feed there.

The central trade-off

GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.

JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF): the counter-case, on quality.

Fund facts, side by side

Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.

MeasureGPIXJEPQWhy it matters
Expense ratio0.35%0.35%Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold.
Holdings496110More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns.
Average volume1,096,7266,194,078Liquidity — matters most if you trade size.
Annualized volatility11.2%15.1%Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure.
Max drawdown (1Y)-8.9%-10.3%The worst peak-to-trough loss over the past year.
Sharpe ratio0.390.04Return per unit of risk. Higher is better.
Beta0.861.04Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio.

Where the exposure actually sits

Sector exposure for each fund, ordered by the size of the difference.

Technology40.0% vs 61.0%
Financial Services15.1% vs 0.4%
Communication Services6.7% vs 12.6%
Healthcare9.1% vs 4.2%
Industrials7.3% vs 3.9%
Energy3.7% vs 0.3%
Consumer Cyclical8.7% vs 10.5%
Real Estate1.7% vs 0.2%
GPIXJEPQ

How much of the same holdings they own

GPIX and JEPQ share 46.5% of their weighted exposure across 80 common holdings.

410 holdings are unique to GPIX, and 26 holdings are unique to JEPQ. Owning both is a partial overlap: a majority of the capital is distinct, but the largest positions are shared.

JEPQ is the more concentrated of the two: its ten largest positions are 42.65% of the fund, against 38.76% for GPIX (110 holdings vs 496). Concentration cuts both ways — it is what drives outperformance when the top names work, and what makes the drawdown deeper when they do not.

Largest shared positions

HoldingGPIXJEPQShared
NVDANVIDIA CORPORATION8.1%7.22%7.22%
AAPLAPPLE INC.7.38%6.63%6.63%
MSFTMICROSOFT CORPORATION5.48%5.16%5.16%
AMZNAMAZON.COM INC COMMON3.82%3.94%3.82%
AVGOBROADCOM INC.2.51%2.05%2.05%
MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC1.69%4.67%1.69%
TSLATESLA INC COMMON STOCK1.56%2.08%1.56%
METAMETA PLATFORMS INC1.48%2.71%1.48%

Shared weight is the lower of the two positions — the portion of capital both funds genuinely have in the same security.

What GPIX adds that JEPQ doesn’t

HoldingGPIXJEPQ
XLCSTATE STREET COMMUNICATION SERVICES SELECT SECTOR3.52%Not held
GOOGLALPHABET INC.3.23%Not held
JPMJPMORGAN CHASE & CO1.46%Not held
BRK-BBERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.1.38%Not held
LLYELI LILLY & CO1.36%Not held
XOMEXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORPORATION1.08%Not held

What JEPQ adds that GPIX doesn’t

HoldingJEPQGPIX
GOOGALPHABET INC-CL C -4.77%1.13%
MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC4.67%1.69%
AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES3.4%1.27%
LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORP COMMON1.98%0.6%
WMTWALMART INC COMMON STOCK1.67%0.47%
STXSEAGATE TECHNOLOGY1.66%0.28%

Each list is a fund’s largest positions by weight that the other fund does not hold, or holds at less than half the weight.

AIQ Agreement Matrix

3 of 3 covered evidence groups favor GPIX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.

Evidence groupFavorsReading
AIQ ScoreGPIX62 vs 54
FundamentalsNot coveredNot covered
ValuationNot coveredNot covered
TechnicalsGPIXPrice vs 50-day 0.3% vs -0.4%; vs 200-day 3.3% vs 0.6%
Risk ResilienceGPIXRisk Resilience 84 vs 80
Analyst expectationsNot coveredNot covered

✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of GPIX and JEPQ and are excluded from the count.

AIQ Decision Stability

Competitive

The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.

  • The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
  • 3 of 3 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
  • The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
  • The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)

Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on GPIX.

How the comparison changed

45 daily snapshots · Sep 6 – Oct 20

GPIX lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 8 points over 30 sessions.

Sep 6GPIX leads above the line · JEPQ leads belowOct 20
Today
GPIX +8
62 vs 54
7 sessions ago
GPIX +10
65 vs 55
30 sessions ago
GPIX +3
68 vs 65
90 sessions ago
Not covered

The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Oct 2 when GPIX moved ahead of JEPQ.

AIQ Signal Divergence

Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.

GPIXConflicted

3 bullish / 1 bearish / 3 neutral, conflicted

Only GPIX

  • EMA Ribbon Compression — neutral, trend, medium horizon
  • EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
  • 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (1.1%)
JEPQConflicted

2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted

Only JEPQ

  • Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
  • RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon

Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Golden Cross Active, ATR Contraction - Coiling, MACD Bearish Crossover.

GPIX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.

Price vs model alignment

Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.

GPIXNo material change

Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.43%, AIQ 0 points).

JEPQDivergence

Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.86%, AIQ -1 points).

What would flip this result

A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.

  1. 1JEPQ closes the Momentum gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to GPIX's edge.
  2. 2JEPQ's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
  3. 3GPIX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
  4. 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.

The full evidence

Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.

Performance

GPIX leads 6 of 6 windows
MetricGPIXJEPQ
1 week (5 sessions)-0.8%-2.4%
1 month (20 sessions)-0.8%-2.8%
3 months (63 sessions)1.2%0%
6 months (126 sessions)5.2%1.4%
Year to date6%2.3%
1 year (252 sessions)8.5%4.1%

Technicals

GPIX has the stronger structure
MetricGPIXJEPQ
RSI (14)5229.6
ADX (14)12.521.8
Price vs 50-day0.3%-0.4%
Price vs 200-day3.3%0.6%
Volatility (1M, annualized)7.6%10.8%

Risk

GPIX is the more resilient
MetricGPIXJEPQ
Beta0.861.04
Sharpe ratio0.390.04
Sortino ratio0.60.05
Max drawdown-8.9%-10.3%
Current drawdown-1.3%-3.3%
Annualized volatility11.2%15.1%
Value at risk (95%)-1.3%-1.7%

Straight answers

Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.

What is the difference between GPIX and JEPQ?

GPIX holds 496 positions to JEPQ's 110, and 47% of their weight is in the same securities.

How much do GPIX and JEPQ overlap?

GPIX and JEPQ share 46.5% of their weighted exposure across 80 common holdings. 410 holdings are unique to GPIX, and 26 holdings are unique to JEPQ. Owning both is a partial overlap: a majority of the capital is distinct, but the largest positions are shared.

Which ETF is more diversified, GPIX or JEPQ?

GPIX holds more positions: 496 versus 110 for JEPQ.

Which has the lower expense ratio?

Neither: both charge 0.35% a year.

Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?

JEPQ, with a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 11.58% against 8.2% for GPIX.

Which ETF has been more volatile?

JEPQ has been more volatile over the past year, at 15.1% annualized against 11.2% for GPIX.

Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?

Their worst peak-to-trough falls over the past year are similar: -8.9% for GPIX and -10.3% for JEPQ.

Compare GPIX and JEPQ with others

Continue your research

This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.

How this comparison is scored

The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.

The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.

How to use side-by-side comparison →

This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.