HLIO vs INTC Stock Comparison
HLIO currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 46 vs 31. The clearest difference is value.
What is the main difference between HLIO and INTC?
HLIO leads the current stock comparison as Helios Technologies, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Helios Technologies, Inc. vs Intel Corp.
HLIO leads
HLIO leads by 15 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 23 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors INTC on target upside.
Competitive: 5 of 6 evidence groups support HLIO, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Helios Technologies, Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HLIO over INTC, 46 versus 31 as of Nov 7, 2026. HLIO's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience. HLIO also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors INTC. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HLIO today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. HLIO lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 23 to 15 points over 30 sessions. HLIO leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Helios Technologies, Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare HLIO and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value56 vs 34HLIO +22
- Risk Resilience54 vs 33HLIO +21
- Quality52 vs 42HLIO +10
- Momentum20 vs 15HLIO +5
5 of 6 evidence groups favor HLIO. HLIO’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-11-06, compared against the prior scored session 2026-11-05.
Largest factor move: Momentum -5
New signals
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
HLIO's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — HLIO and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
HLIO (Helios Technologies, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 121.5% against 60.4%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HLIOHLIO on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
HLIOHLIO on the peer-relative Value factor, by 22 points.
Momentum
HLIOHLIO on the Momentum factor, by 5 points.
Lower downside
HLIOHLIO on Risk Resilience, by 21 points.
Analyst upside
INTCINTC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors HLIO, analyst targets favor INTC. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | HLIO | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +73.2% | +102% | INTC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +71.8% | +114.4% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 28 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HLIO. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | HLIO | 46 vs 31 |
| Fundamentals | HLIOon balance | TTM ROE 7.6% vs -11.2%; gross margin 32.7% vs 40.2%; operating margin 10% vs 3.2% — HLIO takes 2 of 3 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | HLIO | Value 56 vs 34 |
| Technicals | HLIO | Price vs 50-day -30.5% vs -42.5%; vs 200-day -17.3% vs -35.1% |
| Risk Resilience | HLIO | Risk Resilience 54 vs 33 |
| Analyst expectations | INTC | Target upside 73.2% vs 102% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of HLIO and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 15 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HLIO.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jul 8 – Nov 6HLIO lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 23 to 15 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- HLIO +15
- 46 vs 31
- 7 sessions ago
- HLIO +19
- 51 vs 32
- 30 sessions ago
- HLIO +23
- 53 vs 30
- 90 sessions ago
- HLIO +15
- 50 vs 35
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only HLIO
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (7.38%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (12.53%)
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Keltner Channel Breakdown, RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce, MACD Bearish Crossover.
HLIO leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -21.05%, AIQ -2 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +7.71%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Value gap — currently 22 points behind, the largest single contributor to HLIO's edge.
- 2INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3HLIO's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 4 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 15-point move would eliminate HLIO's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
HLIO leads on balance| Metric | HLIO | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 1.5% | — |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 10% | — |
| Gross margin | 32.7% | 40.2% |
| Operating margin | 10% | 3.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 7.6% | -11.2% |
| Debt to equity | 0.02 | 0.44 |
Performance
HLIO leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | HLIO | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -11.4% | -14.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -16.3% | -46.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -26.3% | -41.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -7% | -49.1% |
| Year to date | -8.6% | 52.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -2.2% | 46.6% |
Technicals
HLIO has the stronger structure| Metric | HLIO | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 18.9 | 23.6 |
| ADX (14) | 24.5 | 37.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | -30.5% | -42.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -17.3% | -35.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 60.4% | 121.5% |
Risk
HLIO is the more resilient| Metric | HLIO | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.47 | 3.19 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.23 | 0.87 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.29 | 1.28 |
| Max drawdown | -48.9% | -62.9% |
| Current drawdown | -48.9% | -60.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 44.6% | 84.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.6% | -6.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, HLIO or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HLIO is the stronger of the two as of Nov 7, 2026, scoring 46 against INTC's 31. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is HLIO or INTC the better buy right now?
HLIO carries the stronger systematic profile as of Nov 7, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HLIO over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HLIO leads Value by 22 points; HLIO leads Risk Resilience by 21 points; HLIO leads Quality by 10 points. HLIO leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by INTC simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, HLIO or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +73.2% upside for HLIO and +102% for INTC, so the Street currently favors INTC. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors HLIO. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, HLIO or INTC?
HLIO is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HLIO on the peer-relative Value factor, by 22 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, HLIO or INTC?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, HLIO or INTC?
HLIO on the Momentum factor, by 5 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, HLIO or INTC?
HLIO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. HLIO on Risk Resilience, by 21 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is HLIO more profitable than INTC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 32.7% vs 40.2%; operating margin 10% vs 3.2%; ttm roe 7.6% vs -11.2%. HLIO leads on two measures and INTC on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is HLIO's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
HLIO lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 23 to 15 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-07-08 and 2026-11-06. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the HLIO vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Value gap — currently 22 points behind, the largest single contributor to HLIO's edge; INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; HLIO's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 4 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 15-point move would eliminate HLIO's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about HLIO and INTC?
HLIO: 2 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on HLIO is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare HLIO and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.