HLIT vs INTC Stock Comparison
HLIT currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 54 vs 30. The clearest difference is value.
What is the main difference between HLIT and INTC?
HLIT leads the current stock comparison as Harmonic Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Harmonic Inc. vs Intel Corp.
HLIT leads
HLIT leads by 24 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 6 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support HLIT, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Harmonic Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HLIT over INTC, 54 versus 30 as of Oct 22, 2026. HLIT's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum. HLIT also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HLIT today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the lead has swung materially session to session. HLIT lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 24 points over 30 sessions. HLIT leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Harmonic Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare HLIT and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value65 vs 30HLIT +35
- Momentum49 vs 21HLIT +28
- Risk Resilience56 vs 29HLIT +27
- Quality47 vs 39HLIT +8
4 of 6 evidence groups favor HLIT. HLIT’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
HLIT's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — HLIT and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
HLIT (Harmonic Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HLITHLIT on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
HLITHLIT on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
HLITHLIT on the peer-relative Value factor, by 35 points.
Momentum
HLITHLIT on the Momentum factor, by 28 points.
Lower downside
HLITHLIT on Risk Resilience, by 27 points.
Analyst upside
HLITHLIT on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | HLIT | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +53.1% | +25.7% | HLIT has more room |
| Target dispersion | +24.3% | +115.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 23 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HLIT. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | HLIT | 54 vs 30 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 9.7% vs 18.8%; EPS growth -128.6% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE -12.2% vs -10.8%; gross margin 50.7% vs 38.9% |
| Valuation | HLIT | Value 65 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -6.9% vs -9.6%; vs 200-day -4.2% vs 7.8% |
| Risk Resilience | HLIT | Risk Resilience 56 vs 29 |
| Analyst expectations | HLIT | Target upside 53.1% vs 25.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of HLIT and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 24 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HLIT.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20HLIT lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 24 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- HLIT +24
- 54 vs 30
- 7 sessions ago
- HLIT +21
- 51 vs 30
- 30 sessions ago
- HLIT +6
- 49 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- HLIT +19
- 61 vs 42
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only HLIT
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.31%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (20.88%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode.
HLIT leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.16%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.39%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Value gap — currently 35 points behind, the largest single contributor to HLIT's edge.
- 2INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3HLIT's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | HLIT | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9.7% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -128.6% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 50.7% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 11.9% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -12.2% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.36 | 0.58 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | HLIT | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 5.2% | -10.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.9% | -26% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -7.7% | -10.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 2.4% | 38.4% |
| Year to date | 12% | 148.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 7.7% | 148.9% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | HLIT | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 58.3 | 16.4 |
| ADX (14) | 13.9 | 23.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6.9% | -9.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -4.2% | 7.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 42.1% | 46.6% |
Risk
HLIT is the more resilient| Metric | HLIT | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.93 | 3.08 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.34 | 1.5 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.52 | 2.73 |
| Max drawdown | -41.5% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -35.2% | -34.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 52.2% | 77.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.1% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, HLIT or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HLIT is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 54 against INTC's 30. The edge comes from value and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is HLIT or INTC the better buy right now?
HLIT carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HLIT over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HLIT leads Value by 35 points; HLIT leads Momentum by 28 points; HLIT leads Risk Resilience by 27 points. HLIT leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by INTC simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, HLIT or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +53.1% upside for HLIT and +25.7% for INTC, so the Street currently favors HLIT. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, HLIT or INTC?
HLIT is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HLIT on the peer-relative Value factor, by 35 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, HLIT or INTC?
HLIT on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, HLIT or INTC?
HLIT on the Momentum factor, by 28 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, HLIT or INTC?
HLIT is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. HLIT on Risk Resilience, by 27 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is HLIT more profitable than INTC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 50.7% vs 38.9%; operating margin 11.9% vs 0.1%; ttm roe -12.2% vs -10.8%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is HLIT's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
HLIT lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 24 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the HLIT vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Value gap — currently 35 points behind, the largest single contributor to HLIT's edge; INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; HLIT's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about HLIT and INTC?
HLIT: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on HLIT is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare HLIT and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.