INCY vs INTC Stock Comparison
Compare INCY and INTC across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between INCY and INTC?
INCY leads the current stock comparison as Incyte Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Incyte Corporation vs Intel Corp.
INCY leads
INCY leads by 23 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 33 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support INCY, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Incyte Corporation
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors INCY over INTC, 67 versus 44 as of Sep 11, 2026. INCY's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while INTC holds the stronger momentum profile. INCY also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor INCY today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. INCY lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 33 to 23 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Incyte Corporation and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare INCY and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality90 vs 39INCY +51
- Risk Resilience73 vs 28INCY +45
- Momentum52 vs 77INTC +25
- Value52 vs 30INCY +22
4 of 6 evidence groups favor INCY. INCY’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; INTC keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -8
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
INCY's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INCY and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
INCY (Incyte Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 58.9% against 28%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
INCYINCY on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
INCYINCY on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
INCYINCY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 22 points.
Momentum
INTCINTC on the Momentum factor, by 25 points.
Lower downside
INCYINCY on Risk Resilience, by 45 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | INCY | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +0.3% | -0.1% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +53.4% | +136.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 14 | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor INCY. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | INCY | 67 vs 44 |
| Fundamentals | INCY | revenue growth 31.5% vs 18.8%; EPS growth 92.1% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 29.7% vs -10.8%; gross margin 92.6% vs 38.9% |
| Valuation | INCY | Value 52 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day 0% vs 4.2%; vs 200-day 17.3% vs 33.4% |
| Risk Resilience | INCY | Risk Resilience 73 vs 28 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 0.3% vs -0.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INCY and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 23 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on INCY.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10INCY lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 33 to 23 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- INCY +23
- 67 vs 44
- 7 sessions ago
- INCY +35
- 70 vs 35
- 30 sessions ago
- INCY +33
- 71 vs 38
- 90 sessions ago
- INCY +40
- 73 vs 33
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (15.60%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (31.44%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
INCY leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.47%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.61%, AIQ -2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 51 points behind, the largest single contributor to INCY's edge.
- 2INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3INCY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 10 points over 30 sessions, and a further 23-point move would eliminate INCY's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
INCY leads on balance| Metric | INCY | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 31.5% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 92.1% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 92.6% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 31.6% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 29.7% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.01 | 0.58 |
Performance
INTC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | INCY | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.3% | 11.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.1% | -0.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 17% | -6.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 30.2% | 109.1% |
| Year to date | 24.8% | 171.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 42.9% | 309.8% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | INCY | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41.6 | 61.3 |
| ADX (14) | 18.4 | 15.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0% | 4.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 17.3% | 33.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 28% | 58.9% |
Risk
INCY is the more resilient| Metric | INCY | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.47 | 2.89 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.15 | 2.12 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.9 | 3.98 |
| Max drawdown | -18.3% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -5.1% | -28.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 33.2% | 79.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.8% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INCY or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, INCY is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 67 against INTC's 44. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INCY or INTC the better buy right now?
INCY carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor INCY over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. INCY leads Quality by 51 points; INCY leads Risk Resilience by 45 points; INTC leads Momentum by 25 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INCY or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +0.3% upside for INCY and -0.1% for INTC. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INCY or INTC?
INCY is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. INCY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 22 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INCY or INTC?
INCY on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INCY or INTC?
INTC on the Momentum factor, by 25 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INCY or INTC?
INCY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. INCY on Risk Resilience, by 45 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INCY more profitable than INTC?
INCY leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 92.6% vs 38.9%; operating margin 31.6% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 29.7% vs -10.8%.
Is INCY's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
INCY lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 33 to 23 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the INCY vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 51 points behind, the largest single contributor to INCY's edge; INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; INCY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 10 points over 30 sessions, and a further 23-point move would eliminate INCY's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about INCY and INTC?
INCY: 3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. INTC: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on INCY is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare INCY and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.