INSP vs INTC Stock Comparison
Compare INSP and INTC across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between INSP and INTC?
INSP leads the current stock comparison as Inspire Medical Systems, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. vs Intel Corp.
INSP leads
INSP leads by 22 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 26 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors INTC on target upside.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support INSP, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors INSP over INTC, 66 versus 44 as of Sep 11, 2026. INSP's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. INSP also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors INTC. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor INSP today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. INSP lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 26 to 22 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare INSP and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality77 vs 39INSP +38
- Risk Resilience58 vs 28INSP +30
- Value49 vs 30INSP +19
- Momentum78 vs 77Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor INSP. INSP’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -8
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
INSP's lead widened by 3 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INSP and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
INSP (Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on technicals, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 58.9% against 42.7%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
INSPINSP on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
INSPINSP on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
INSPINSP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
INSPINSP on Risk Resilience, by 30 points.
Analyst upside
INTCINTC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors INSP, analyst targets favor INTC. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | INSP | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -21.8% | -0.1% | INTC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +80.6% | +136.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor INSP. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | INSP | 66 vs 44 |
| Fundamentals | INSPon balance | revenue growth -2% vs 18.8%; EPS growth 102.8% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 17.6% vs -10.8%; gross margin 86.1% vs 38.9% — INSP takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | INSP | Value 49 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day 29.8% vs 4.2%; vs 200-day 0.2% vs 33.4% |
| Risk Resilience | INSP | Risk Resilience 58 vs 28 |
| Analyst expectations | INTC | Target upside -21.8% vs -0.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INSP and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 22 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on INSP.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10INSP lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 26 to 22 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- INSP +22
- 66 vs 44
- 7 sessions ago
- INSP +30
- 65 vs 35
- 30 sessions ago
- INSP +26
- 64 vs 38
- 90 sessions ago
- INSP +33
- 66 vs 33
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (17.21%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (31.44%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
INSP leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +7.16%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.61%, AIQ -2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to INSP's edge.
- 2INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3INSP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 22-point move would eliminate INSP's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
INSP leads on balance| Metric | INSP | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 102.8% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 86.1% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 6% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 17.6% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.04 | 0.58 |
Performance
INTC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | INSP | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 8% | 11.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 16.9% | -0.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 61.1% | -6.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 6.9% | 109.1% |
| Year to date | -26.1% | 171.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -21.1% | 309.8% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | INSP | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 69 | 61.3 |
| ADX (14) | 37.2 | 15.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 29.8% | 4.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.2% | 33.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 42.7% | 58.9% |
Risk
INSP is the more resilient| Metric | INSP | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.06 | 2.89 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.03 | 2.12 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.05 | 3.98 |
| Max drawdown | -72.2% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -52.7% | -28.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 70.9% | 79.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INSP or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, INSP is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 66 against INTC's 44. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INSP or INTC the better buy right now?
INSP carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor INSP over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. INSP leads Quality by 38 points; INSP leads Risk Resilience by 30 points; INSP leads Value by 19 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INSP or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply -21.8% upside for INSP and -0.1% for INTC, so the Street currently favors INTC. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors INSP. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INSP or INTC?
INSP is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. INSP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INSP or INTC?
INSP on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INSP or INTC?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INSP or INTC?
INSP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. INSP on Risk Resilience, by 30 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INSP more profitable than INTC?
INSP leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 86.1% vs 38.9%; operating margin 6% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 17.6% vs -10.8%.
Is INSP's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
INSP lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 26 to 22 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the INSP vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to INSP's edge; INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; INSP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 22-point move would eliminate INSP's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about INSP and INTC?
INSP: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on INSP is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare INSP and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.