INTC vs CVX Stock Comparison
Compare INTC and CVX across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between INTC and CVX?
CVX leads the current stock comparison as Chevron Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Intel Corp. vs Chevron Corporation
CVX leads
CVX leads by 12 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 17 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support CVX, its lead is narrowing, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Intel Corp.
Chevron Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CVX over INTC, 56 versus 44 as of Sep 11, 2026. CVX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while INTC holds the stronger momentum profile. CVX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CVX today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. CVX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 12 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Intel Corp. and Chevron Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare INTC and CVX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience28 vs 63CVX +35
- Quality39 vs 52CVX +13
- Value30 vs 42CVX +12
- Momentum77 vs 73INTC +4
4 of 6 evidence groups favor CVX. CVX’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; INTC keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -8
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No new signals fired.
CVX's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INTC and CVX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
CVX (Chevron Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 58.9% against 17.7%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CVXCVX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
CVXCVX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
CVXCVX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 12 points.
Momentum
INTCINTC on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
CVXCVX on Risk Resilience, by 35 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | INTC | CVX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -0.1% | +0.4% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +136.1% | +32.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 27 | 12 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CVX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | CVX | 44 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | CVXon balance | revenue growth 18.8% vs 41.3%; EPS growth -195.9% vs 4.5%; TTM ROE -10.8% vs 11%; gross margin 38.9% vs 31% — CVX takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | CVX | Value 30 vs 42 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day 4.2% vs 10.5%; vs 200-day 33.4% vs 16.9% |
| Risk Resilience | CVX | Risk Resilience 28 vs 63 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside -0.1% vs 0.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INTC and CVX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 12 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CVX.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10CVX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 12 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- CVX +12
- 44 vs 56
- 7 sessions ago
- CVX +21
- 35 vs 56
- 30 sessions ago
- CVX +17
- 38 vs 55
- 90 sessions ago
- CVX +12
- 33 vs 45
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on May 6 when INTC moved ahead of CVX.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (31.44%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
5 bullish / 0 bearish
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (6.46%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.61%, AIQ -2 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.61%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 35 points behind, the largest single contributor to CVX's edge.
- 2INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3CVX's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 5 points over 30 sessions, and a further 12-point move would eliminate CVX's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
CVX leads on balance| Metric | INTC | CVX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.8% | 41.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -195.9% | 4.5% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% | 31% |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | 15.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.8% | 11% |
| Debt to equity | 0.58 | 0.2 |
Performance
INTC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | INTC | CVX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 11.4% | 0.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.6% | 8.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -6.3% | 12.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 109.1% | 10.9% |
| Year to date | 171.9% | 38.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 309.8% | 38.2% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | INTC | CVX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 61.3 | 62.4 |
| ADX (14) | 15.5 | 30.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | 4.2% | 10.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 33.4% | 16.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 58.9% | 17.7% |
Risk
CVX is the more resilient| Metric | INTC | CVX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.89 | -0.48 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.12 | 1.31 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.98 | 1.93 |
| Max drawdown | -41.9% | -21.5% |
| Current drawdown | -28.8% | -0.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 79.9% | 23.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -2.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INTC or CVX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CVX is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 56 against INTC's 44. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INTC or CVX the better buy right now?
CVX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CVX over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. CVX leads Risk Resilience by 35 points; CVX leads Quality by 13 points; CVX leads Value by 12 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INTC or CVX?
Analyst price targets imply -0.1% upside for INTC and +0.4% for CVX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INTC or CVX?
CVX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. CVX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 12 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INTC or CVX?
CVX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INTC or CVX?
INTC on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INTC or CVX?
CVX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. CVX on Risk Resilience, by 35 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INTC more profitable than CVX?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 38.9% vs 31%; operating margin 0.1% vs 15.8%; ttm roe -10.8% vs 11%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is CVX's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
CVX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 12 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-05-06, when INTC moved ahead of CVX.
What would change the INTC vs CVX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 35 points behind, the largest single contributor to CVX's edge; INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; CVX's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 5 points over 30 sessions, and a further 12-point move would eliminate CVX's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about INTC and CVX?
INTC: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. CVX: 5 bullish / 0 bearish. The most decision-relevant rule on INTC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On CVX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare INTC and CVX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.