INTC vs MDB Stock Comparison
Compare INTC and MDB across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between INTC and MDB?
MDB leads the current stock comparison as MongoDB, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Intel Corp. vs MongoDB, Inc.
MDB leads
MDB leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 15 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support MDB, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Intel Corp.
MongoDB, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors MDB over INTC, 38 versus 35 as of Sep 9, 2026. MDB's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while INTC holds the stronger momentum profile. MDB also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MDB today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. MDB lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 15 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Intel Corp. and MongoDB, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare INTC and MDB against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality39 vs 62MDB +23
- Momentum40 vs 19INTC +21
- Risk Resilience29 vs 49MDB +20
- Value30 vs 25INTC +5
3 of 6 evidence groups favor MDB. MDB’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; INTC keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-07, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-06.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
MDB's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INTC and MDB both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
MDB (MongoDB, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, value, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
MDBMDB on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
MDBMDB on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
INTCINTC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points.
Momentum
INTCINTC on the Momentum factor, by 21 points.
Lower downside
MDBMDB on Risk Resilience, by 20 points.
Analyst upside
MDBMDB on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | INTC | MDB | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -1.5% | +28.4% | MDB has more room |
| Target dispersion | +136.1% | +53.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 27 | 16 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MDB. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 35 vs 38 |
| Fundamentals | MDBon balance | revenue growth 18.8% vs -1.1%; EPS growth -195.9% vs -70.9%; TTM ROE -10.8% vs 2%; gross margin 38.9% vs 72.7%; operating margin 0.1% vs -0.5% — MDB takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | INTC | Value 30 vs 25 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day 3.8% vs -4.7%; vs 200-day 29.2% vs 7.7% |
| Risk Resilience | MDB | Risk Resilience 29 vs 49 |
| Analyst expectations | MDB | Target upside -1.5% vs 28.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INTC and MDB and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on MDB.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 28 – Sep 7MDB lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 15 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- MDB +3
- 35 vs 38
- 7 sessions ago
- MDB +7
- 33 vs 40
- 30 sessions ago
- MDB +15
- 41 vs 56
- 90 sessions ago
- MDB +9
- 40 vs 49
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Jun 22 when INTC moved ahead of MDB.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (35.67%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.34%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
3 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (9.05%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
MDB leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +9.05%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.46%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to MDB's edge.
- 2INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3MDB's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 12 points over 30 sessions, and a further 3-point move would eliminate MDB's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
MDB leads on balance| Metric | INTC | MDB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.8% | -1.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -195.9% | -70.9% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% | 72.7% |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | -0.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.8% | 2% |
| Debt to equity | 0.58 | 0.01 |
Performance
INTC leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | INTC | MDB |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 7.1% | -17.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -5.8% | -7.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.4% | 5.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 120.6% | 36.3% |
| Year to date | 159.6% | -12.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 299.2% | 18.5% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | INTC | MDB |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 37.6 | 34.3 |
| ADX (14) | 14.2 | 22.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | 3.8% | -4.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 29.2% | 7.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 47.7% | 82.4% |
Risk
MDB is the more resilient| Metric | INTC | MDB |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.91 | 1.69 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.06 | 0.48 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.84 | 0.69 |
| Max drawdown | -41.9% | -48.7% |
| Current drawdown | -32% | -21.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 79.2% | 66.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -5.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INTC or MDB?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, MDB is the stronger of the two as of Sep 9, 2026, scoring 38 against INTC's 35. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INTC or MDB the better buy right now?
MDB carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 9, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor MDB over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. MDB leads Quality by 23 points; INTC leads Momentum by 21 points; MDB leads Risk Resilience by 20 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INTC or MDB?
Analyst price targets imply -1.5% upside for INTC and +28.4% for MDB, so the Street currently favors MDB. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INTC or MDB?
INTC is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. INTC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INTC or MDB?
MDB on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INTC or MDB?
INTC on the Momentum factor, by 21 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INTC or MDB?
MDB is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. MDB on Risk Resilience, by 20 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INTC more profitable than MDB?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 38.9% vs 72.7%; operating margin 0.1% vs -0.5%; ttm roe -10.8% vs 2%. INTC leads on one measure and MDB on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is MDB's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
MDB lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 15 to 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-28 and 2026-09-07. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-06-22, when INTC moved ahead of MDB.
What would change the INTC vs MDB verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to MDB's edge; INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; MDB's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 12 points over 30 sessions, and a further 3-point move would eliminate MDB's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about INTC and MDB?
INTC: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. MDB: 3 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on INTC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On MDB it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare INTC and MDB with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.