INTC vs OMCL Stock Comparison
Compare INTC and OMCL across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between INTC and OMCL?
OMCL leads the current stock comparison as Omnicell, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Intel Corp. vs Omnicell, Inc.
OMCL leads
OMCL leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 13 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 5 of 6 evidence groups support OMCL, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Intel Corp.
Omnicell, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OMCL over INTC, 49 versus 44 as of Sep 11, 2026. OMCL's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while INTC holds the stronger momentum profile. OMCL also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OMCL today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. OMCL lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Intel Corp. and Omnicell, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare INTC and OMCL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum77 vs 26INTC +51
- Value30 vs 62OMCL +32
- Risk Resilience28 vs 58OMCL +30
- Quality39 vs 51OMCL +12
5 of 6 evidence groups favor OMCL. OMCL’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; INTC keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -8
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No new signals fired.
OMCL's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INTC and OMCL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OMCL (Omnicell, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 58.9% against 37%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OMCLOMCL on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
OMCLOMCL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
OMCLOMCL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points.
Momentum
INTCINTC on the Momentum factor, by 51 points.
Lower downside
OMCLOMCL on Risk Resilience, by 30 points.
Analyst upside
OMCLOMCL on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | INTC | OMCL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -0.1% | +83% | OMCL has more room |
| Target dispersion | +136.1% | +33.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 27 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OMCL. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OMCL | 44 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | OMCL | EPS growth -195.9% vs 112%; TTM ROE -10.8% vs 3.1%; gross margin 38.9% vs 44.8% |
| Valuation | OMCL | Value 30 vs 62 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day 4.2% vs -15.6%; vs 200-day 33.4% vs -18.8% |
| Risk Resilience | OMCL | Risk Resilience 28 vs 58 |
| Analyst expectations | OMCL | Target upside -0.1% vs 83% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INTC and OMCL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OMCL.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10OMCL lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- OMCL +5
- 44 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- OMCL +16
- 35 vs 51
- 30 sessions ago
- OMCL +13
- 38 vs 51
- 90 sessions ago
- OMCL +29
- 33 vs 62
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (31.44%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (4.79%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
OMCL leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.61%, AIQ -2 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.67%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Value gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to OMCL's edge.
- 2INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3OMCL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate OMCL's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
OMCL leads on balance| Metric | INTC | OMCL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.8% | 0.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -195.9% | 112% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% | 44.8% |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | 4.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.8% | 3.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.58 | 0.15 |
Performance
INTC leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | INTC | OMCL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 11.4% | -7.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.6% | -13.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -6.3% | -15.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 109.1% | -14% |
| Year to date | 171.9% | -27% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 309.8% | -0.2% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | INTC | OMCL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 61.3 | 31.2 |
| ADX (14) | 15.5 | 29.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 4.2% | -15.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | 33.4% | -18.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 58.9% | 37% |
Risk
OMCL is the more resilient| Metric | INTC | OMCL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.89 | 0.98 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.12 | 0.14 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.98 | 0.22 |
| Max drawdown | -41.9% | -37.2% |
| Current drawdown | -28.8% | -37.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 79.9% | 51% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -4.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INTC or OMCL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OMCL is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 49 against INTC's 44. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INTC or OMCL the better buy right now?
OMCL carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OMCL over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. INTC leads Momentum by 51 points; OMCL leads Value by 32 points; OMCL leads Risk Resilience by 30 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INTC or OMCL?
Analyst price targets imply -0.1% upside for INTC and +83% for OMCL, so the Street currently favors OMCL. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INTC or OMCL?
OMCL is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. OMCL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INTC or OMCL?
OMCL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INTC or OMCL?
INTC on the Momentum factor, by 51 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INTC or OMCL?
OMCL is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. OMCL on Risk Resilience, by 30 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INTC more profitable than OMCL?
OMCL leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 38.9% vs 44.8%; operating margin 0.1% vs 4.7%; ttm roe -10.8% vs 3.1%.
Is OMCL's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
OMCL lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the INTC vs OMCL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Value gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to OMCL's edge; INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; OMCL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate OMCL's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about INTC and OMCL?
INTC: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. OMCL: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on INTC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On OMCL it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare INTC and OMCL with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.